Derailment Bitchfest from the Green Room

I know your game and I'm not playing it. And you know I won't play it so you try to turn not playing it into some massive board issue as another way to accomplish your goals.

It isn't going to work. And your brand of shit is why our rules have it ultimately up to the common sense of the staff what constitutes a problem and how to handle it.

Forget it. And no, I don't care how much name calling, Nazi accusations you want to toss out there. I. don't. Care. You are here for one thing....your own lulz and all your protestations of giving two shits about WF are a pack of lies. This is not SD.net and you won't be controlling what goes on here.

So knock off the shit and go back to acting like your usual poster self or take a hike to another board where you can act the tit and pull their strings, because it won't be here while I am in charge.

This thread made me agree with faceman

As I said asked in the thread, just how "nasty" are our AVs? They are light hearted teasing. What is nasty about a Jabba the Hutt joke, "sexy beast" or no time for bad beer?

You would compare this to the manipulation of an image containing someone's kids? You really are out of touch with reality. You're like the kid who always runs to teacher in school because he doesn't get his own way, rather than just laughing with the other kids.

If Tamar's position as board leader is enough to make you an even more whiney shit then I think I may have to revise my views on her suitability for the role.

I guess I'll just have to call it "light hearted teasing" then.

So you won't be enforcing the rules fairly, then. All you had to say.

Since you acknowledge that the stuff in this thread is a clear attempt at causing trouble, and was started in the Green Room, he should be warned since it's a clear example of trying to spam up the place for a reaction/attention.

That is unless we are seeing the same bullshit as we saw with Dayton and moving the thread to the Red Room gets him off a warning.

There may not be enough evidence, as he edited the posts in question. It opens up a new loophole in the trolling/flaming rules. Next time, those of us who see it will have to take screen shots.

So, to recap: Two posters break the rules. I complain about two posters breaking the rules at my expense... and my complaints about the rule-breaking are labeled trolling.

You've already had your answer FOUR times on this issue. You already know that a fifth attempt won't work.

That is what makes this trolling.

Most of his posts were quoted in ours. There's enough evidence to show that he was trying to derail the picture thread - and the very fact that he edited them means that he knew full well he was trying to derail the thread and make it about him (his usual tactic).

I only need to get the right answer just the one time.

Hmm, let's see. What's the difference between posting photos of an (ostensible) adult member of WF and posting photos of underage children who are not members of WF?

Tell you what: Test it out in RL. Go outdoors (big step) and start taking photos of people's kids without their permission and see what happens to you.

What if I replace the kids in gul's photo with penguins? And by the way, it's a photo of gul and his kids, not a picture of just gul's kids. There are some lines I won't cross even to make a point.

So you do see the difference.

I yearn for the days of polarslam.

For a second, it looked like you posted, "I yearn for the days of potassium."

Why don't you remove gul's kids entirely from the picture and try it? You'll then see that gul won't have a fit and expose yourself even further as the pathetic individual we already know you are.

Seconded.

No, there have to be stand-ins. Either penguins, or maybe the zombie kid from the first episode of The Walking Dead and a decapitated chicken.

You're not that creative.

Besides, gul having a fit is the point. It wouldn't be "light hearted teasing" otherwise.

I just came up with that. So you're saying I'm not as creative as I am? Paradoxical.

What's the difference between what you just said and what El Chup said? Replace the kids with penguins. Do it.

I like my muscles functional, yes.

Well, it might be penguins. It might be something else. I might not replace anything at all. It has to bother him; that's the point. If it's open season on Green Room harvesting, I'm going to make the most of it.

So basically, you would like to do it to purposely try and get a reaction from someone? If he doesn't have a fit you have failed at your objective? A curious attitude from someone who whines so much.

It's perfectly okay according to the staff.

Why do you imagine a Photoshop of penguins would bother him?

Claiming they're his children just makes you look more stupid than usual.

Leaving any evidence of his actual children in the photo can get you in trouble.

Tell us again what you perceive to be your advantage here.