Complete BS. I was never going to vote for anyone in 2008 who supported abortion rights and pulling out of Iraq.
Please. Novelty Negro only won by a mere 9,550,193 votes. Dayton can easily prove that those few votes were motivated by race.
Because it's a lie. And only a racist ass needs to explain his discomfort about a black man in the Oval Office by resorting to the lie. Go fuck yourself and then drink some draino.
Actually, some analysts at MIT crunched the exit poll data and concluded that if Obama had been white, McCain would have won the popular vote by a narrow margin.
Bullshit. No Republican had a snowball's chance in Hell coming behind a Bush administration. Hilary knew that too, which is why she sat out 2004 and the Dems ran Kerry the no-charisma wonder.
We didn't get a single-payer option even with a Democratic congress, because Obama didn't push hard enough. That alone is a huge failure. Then the GOP succeeded in obstructing everything else. I think a "great president" would be one to overcome tough circumstances. Obama, however, will be remembered as one weighed down by circumstances.
100 years from now in a social studies hologram: Barack Obama - 2009-2017. The first black president - a feat not yet accomplished by another. ...and that'll be pretty much if for that entry.
Undoutably, he had supporters that voted on his race. But he's far from the first black candidate to run for either party. Why didn't Jesse Jackson not get the nomination in '84? Why didn't Hermann Cain last time, despite Stephen Colbert trolling his viewers by campaigning with the guy when he spoke in South Carolins? Could it be people looked past Obama's skin and liked having an eloquent, clear speaker after a decade with a stuttering clusterfuck of a miserable failure, to steal Volpone's phrase?
So people voted for Obama because he could speak well? Voting for him because he was black would have been a better reason. At least that shows a sense of history
So did Reid & Biden pat Obama on the head and offer him a slice of watermelon while they complimented him while they were at it? Condescending enough or what?
No, I was serious. You, sir, are the product of a failed abortion and should not exist. You should be a non person. Since that didn't work, I'll paraphrase the late @Chardman by telling you to die in a fucking fire and remedy this unfortunate situation.
Yes, it is, but he doesn't have any good ideas to articulate, so he just babbles on and on about the arc of history, coming together, and meaningless red lines - which are always somebody else's fault. As Clint pointed out, he's an empty chair.
Look at the real time deaths this year: Abortion: 660,990 Heart Disease: 371,863 Cancer: 358,154 Tobacco: 211,854 Obesity: 185,826 Medical Errors: 152,205 Stroke: 80,567 Lower Respiratory Disease: 86,523 Accident (unintentional): 82,353 Hospital Associated Infection: 59,924 Alcohol: 60,530 Diabetes: 46,298 Alzheimer's Disease: 56,620 Influenza/Pneumonia: 33,429 Kidney Failure: 25,884 Blood Infection: 20,256 Suicide: 25,890 Drunk Driving: 20,464 Unintentional Poisoning: 19,223 All Drug Abuse: 15,135 Homicide: 10,168 Prescription Drug Overdose: 9,079 Murder by gun: 6,957 Texting while Driving: 3,625 Pedestrian: 3,026 Drowning: 2,370 Fire Related: 2,119 Malnutrition: 1,678 Domestic Violence: 884 Smoking in Bed: 472 Falling out of Bed: 362 Killed by Falling Tree: 90 Struck by Lightning: 50 Mass Shooting * Domestic: 19 Radical Islamic Terrorism: 49 Pokemon Go:2 Obama didn't do anything for the ones at the top of the list, and those last two at the bottom have really taken off under his watch.
never mind... according to these folks there have been 229 verifiable deaths in mass shootings (so far) this year.
I didn't mark it with an asterisk. That was part of the original list. What they did was divide mass shootings into two types, domestic terrorism and radical Islamic terrorism, with 19 and 49 dead, respectively. What's especially disturbing is the two deaths from Pokemon Go, which didn't get classified as: Accident (unintentional): 82,353 Homicide: 10,168 Texting while Driving: 3,625 Pedestrian: 3,026, Drowning: 2,370 Fire Related: 2,119 That indicates that there are Pokemon Go deaths that don't fit into any of the provided categories, and one category that's missing is animal attack. Can people be killed by a virtual Pokemon? It would seem so!
I still don't say 4 is a "mass" shooting and several of those were only 4, between being killed and wounded. I know, I know somebody is going to say well I'm sure if you were hurt it would be important, or something along those lines. I'm not saying they are unimportant, but to me that isn't a mass... And yes the term mass and its size are subject to interpretation as there is no true definition I can find for the number of "mass". (At least in a cursory look)
Well, from an outside PoV he hasn't done that much good. But much more importantly he hasn't done that much bad. Compared to the last guy he is angelic.