That's an essay by Ted Cruz which directly contradicts your claims. It makes no reference to your alleged source whatsoever.
Didn't plan for it to. I just happened across it. But it does have a fairly prominent U.S. official supporting the concept that treaties signed by the U.S. are NOT de facto U.S. law.
I am totally sure that going to war against a bunch of countries with a combined population of 155 million would have turned out absolutely perfectly and in no way escalated.
Ah, so if you would wait until Iraq and Afghanistan were sorted before moving on you'd be in exactly the same situation you are now anyway.
"One step" toward what? What's your endgame? It's funny seeing you start a thread about Americans' lack of moderation.
Complete difference in moderation in personal behavior and national behavior. The endgame is the utter destruction of any power that opposes the will of the United States.
Personal behavior results in national behavior. Fortunately your desire for world domination will never amount to anything but pontificating on a message board.
Did you bother to read it first? It is an essay offering a point of view on a matter that is obviously in some debate, and the point of view it offers is completely different than the one that you claimed that you found in a law book - being only that there are some limits on the ability of the executive to override domestic law by way of signing treaties. It remains that you have entirely fabricated or distorted the information presented in Post #27. I can tell this not because I'm an expert, but because I have a basic laymans understanding of the subject and of logic. So once again, please stop spouting your make-believe as it if were unarguable fact.
How dare you use your super powers of reading comprehension and logic to form a rationalized supported point. That is so not a @Dayton Kitchens thing.
A Dayton thread advocating wars, mass destruction and causally throwing around the figure of 160,000 dead people with not even a hint of regret (or respect). Not exactly untypical of the guy who is not a war monger!
It's like he's not even trying anymore. I liked him better when there was a degree of subtlety to his trolls. Now, he's like the J.J. Abrams version of Dayton
I'm not comparing you to J.J. Abrams. I'm comparing you to what J.J. Abrams does to other peoples' characters. He takes their most definable characteristics and amps them up to eleven. Your trolling used to be pretty subtle and would steadily build into jingoism. Lately, though, it feels like you're just blindly throwing bricks in the hopes that someone's window will break. I don't know if it's the pressure of the Feds investigating you or if it's your unemployment benefits running out or what, but you're losing your edge, old man.
No, “teacher”. "War is the continuation of politics by other means” is a quote from von Clausewitz. >EDIT< Damn! NotDaytoned!
That may have been the first time. At least the first time in a long time. In my defense I was just waking up. And like much of what NotDayton posts, it’s easy to mistake because the content is so close to the bullshit you post, failure. Also, you have no room to call anyone “idiot”, pendejo.
Again.....you purported to be a Federal Wildlife Officer, bragged about it in a public forum with your real name attached, got caught and ended up on the radar of a federal investigation. You have no room to call anyone else an idiot as you've won the Triple Crown of Stupidity.
Why are you so obsessed with my job history @shootER? It isn't like I brag about it and hold it up to be a positive.
As far as I know, you've never given a detailed, public version of your side of the story. So, until and unless you do so, I can only go with the information that is available. But, by all means, if you'd care to correct the record, feel free to do so. Otherwise, don't let the weight of that Triple Crown of Stupidity play havoc with your neck.