Dogun it! Chick-fil-A's Gone All Woke On Us!

I tried Chik-Fil-A for the first time when I was in Las Vegas three weeks ago.

I stand by my earlier statement about Popeye's.

As fast food goes, Chik-Fil-A was nothing special at all and I have no desire to ever go back.

It's just chicken breast soaked in pickle brine. Our local Lee's Famous Recipe has a chicken sandwich that tastes better than that, and it costs less, too. Plus they give me potato wedges.

Leftists forgot this basic concept. If you don't like it, change the channel, don't eat it, don't attend the speech, don't shop there, etc.. They want to burn shit down and force feed us their philosophy instead. We went from, "we're here, we're queer, get used to it!" "we just want to be tolerated and left alone." To, "we're here, it's pride month and you need to award us a medal for being LGBTQ + and participate in celebrating us or you're a bigot!"

So you are saying they are not putting tranny semen in the lemonade? So why have I been giving my semen to the @Bill Carson lemonade company for the past 15 years? I thought he had a side job making lemonade for the christian chicken place.

Fuck you federal fetus! What have you been doing with my semen!?!

We do, and when enough of us do it that it hurts the bottom line, then you call it "cancelling".

I think the reason conservatives are stunned that our boycott power ruins their shit, is because they're mentally trained to think of people they don't like as "minorities".
That we're this little cult that can be told to "shut up, and go away".
No, muthafuckas, WE outnumber YOU.
The only reason Republicans have held on to ANY power is gerrymandering.

Yeah. I’ve been eating some of those healthy bowls for lunch that use cauliflower rice and can’t tell much a difference. Stuff is bland but that is what seasoning is for.

Well when it's an organized effort, I would call that a boycott. When it comes to a person like Ben Shapiro who had a scheduled speech cancelled because the students couldn't handle other perspectives, I'd call that cancelling.

Students... who organised...

FFS listen to yourself.

I am listening to myself and I didn't say students who organized.

Huh, the Chik-fil-A doesn't donate to anti-LGBTQ organizations anymore as of October 2020, if Wikipedia can be believed (although some of their execs might). Excellent, as one opened up around here a month or two ago.

Nah, they just donate to organizations who then give the money to the anti-LGBTQ groups.

That is some epic clue resistance right there. That is like stabbing out your eye so you don't flinch.

Where in that statement do you see, "students who organized?"

Theoretical Bill Carson: "LGBT+ people are weird. Wherever they are, you will find groomers. We all know that groomers try to molest children."

Anyone on Wordforge with a brain cell: "You're saying LGBT+ people are child molesters?"

Theoretical Bill Carson: "Where did I say that?! Show me where I said the exact words "LGBT+ people are child molesters."

People aren't stupid, @Bill Carson. That pseudo-sophist word game became tiresome 20 years ago.

It is cute how he thinks he fools us when he does that. Then later he will act so surprised we know what a scumbag he is. Toddlers are so stupid.

Link for that?

I haven’t said anything like that. I’m going to be very clear so this statement can be quoted later on. What I said was that some parents, some, not all, some, like to treat their kids like pets and groom them, by groom them I don’t mean in a sexual manner for the purpose of molesting them, but groom them as in prepare them for a particular purpose or activity, to be transsgender because it’s trendy and they can gain attention. How do I know? Because they post videos on Tik Tok doing it. Nowhere did I say that transgender people are the ones doing the grooming and nowhere did I say that it was the purpose of molesting kids.

Source: https://www.esquire.com/food-drink/...k-fil-a-owner-donations-against-equality-act/

Do you know what theoretical means?

Also, ew, that's just as bad, Bill. You remove the agency of these children to understand themselves and force upon them your idea of an archetypal patriarchal heteronormative cisgender structure** that may not fit them. You get upset with parents because you assume they're conditioning their own children while you, a total stranger, are attempting to coerce them because it makes you uncomfortable that they don't fit your idea of what constitutes their sexuality and gender identity. This is why LGBTQ+ people say to quit obsessing over kids genitals. You have no business doing it whatsoever.


**Coercing them to be straight or cisgender when they're not.

Why not let children be children? Children do not have concepts of gender and sexuality and just because a little boy wants to play with Barbie dolls or a little girl wants to play football. It seems it's these parents who are the ones obsessed with genitals.

If you think children do not have concepts of gender and sexuality, then you likely grew up heterosexual and cisgender and just never thought about it, just like the people who think LGBTQ+ people are grooming children are the ones who buy their kids shirts that say "Future Heartbreaker" and "Lock up your daughters" and don't think for two seconds that they're using their kids as ideological sexual outlets.

I knew I was different when I was still 8 years old. I had crushes on girls and boys while I was in elementary and middle school. I am sure many others can say the same, but that would be anecdotal, I guess. So here:

https://www.hopkinsallchildrens.org...DocNew/Understanding-Early-Sexual-Development

Yes, they do.

I had my first crush on a girl in second grade. I may not have known all the anatomical "ins and outs," pun on multiple levels absolutely intended, but I knew what girls were, and that I liked them.

By the way, it's ironic that cultural conservatives -- after years and years of being obsessed with gender conformity -- are now all of a sudden going "boys can play with dolls and girls can like football!" because doing so will aid them in shitting on trans people.

We can all see what you're doing, and we know damn well that if trans people could be erased from existence, conservatives would be right back to mandatory conformity.

Well, on the flip-side, suddenly, and in a selective way for idealogical reasons, progressives are all about conformity.

Neither of these points really move the conversation.

You’re right. My bad.

We HAVE QUOTED YOU. I quoted you. And you still deny everything you say despite it being right here in black and white! If you can’t say what you mean the first time, get a thesaurus.

Trendy? Have you ever heard of munchausen by proxy? This is not a new thing. Yes, some people have a mental illness that causes them to endanger their child to gain attention. Do you honestly think you are the first person to see this? Or trump was? Do you know that most non mentally ill parents of transgender children will punish a child for being different - which I suppose is also a mental illness on the opposite side of the spectrum.

If that’s what you are arguing, just say it. No one will deny it.

But, that’s not what you’re saying is it? You ARE saying all, or even most. That’s what you’ve been arguing for at least a year.

Because people like you think “leftists” brainwashed them.

Wow, so be yourself is now conforming to groupthink according to the drones.

OK boomer.