dude... that's ALL you ever do with people and what they say. although gods know, you also twist your own words after the fact to keep yourself in the role of being somehow put upon. "wanna be left alone"... yeah, right. ya fuckin' moocher.
You, like Diacanu, should at least try harder to be entertaining with your lies and denial of reality.
Why am I not surprised you responded to a question about context by posting a video utterly devoid of it?
The context is there, you just refuse to see it. It';s Morning Blow using the term bloodbath multiple times when talking about elections. You're being purposely obtuse.
You don't have to watch Morning Joe, just watch the video and you'll know exactly what he's talking about.
To be more pointed, unless you show proof otherwise, I’m going to assume all pundits saying it are doing so to mean “a party is losing a lot of seats” or “if this happens, it means a party is probably going to lose a lot of seats”, or “a lot of people are getting fired”. Do you think Trump means “If I lose, the Republican Party will lose a lot of seats”? And if so, how does that square with “controlled chaos”?
No, you can’t. The first clip is, presumably, reporting on Trump’s remarks. The rest is utterly devoid of context.
Insufficient (and obviously, you got this from someone who thinks the objection is to the word "Bloodbath" rather than the context). It's still impossible to tell what he was talking about in the context of the nomination, possibly a major loss of political capital for some party. Do you think a "bloodbath" in the context of the stock market is what Trump was talking about (thanks for the reminder that that's another thing pundits talk about in those terms)? Likewise at the convention. The "hashtag bloodbath" was in reference to anti-Trump Republicans losing seats. Not a problem. "If I lose, it's going to be a bloodbath". That's a threat of political violence. That's the problem. Not the word itself. The word in context, in how it's meant. So show me someone else saying the same thing and meaning something else, or stop sucking on Trump's apparently-delicious brown asshole you utter taint-gobbler.
No, moron, he wasn't threatening violence. My god you're so goddamned brainwashed by left wing propaganda. The context is that he was talking about the automobile industry. Maybe stop listening to the MSM and seek out independent news sources who don't cut out sound bites so they can lie to their audience. Here's the full context and if a three minute video is too long for you then don't ask for the fucking context, douche bag.
Objection withdrawn. Yep, that's pretty clearly referring to economics. EDIT: That said, I have no idea WTF you mean by "controlled chaos". It's clearly a metaphor for "massive job and/or economic losses".