An open letter from Lou Pritchett to President Obama

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Muad Dib, Mar 29, 2010.

  1. mburtonk

    mburtonk mburtonkulous

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    Messages:
    10,508
    Location:
    Minnesnowta
    Ratings:
    +7,626
    Don't look at me, I don't work for any of them. You'd think the man would have sent his letter to a paper biased in his direction at that point--or is it that he just wanted to say he'd been rejected by the big bad New York Times?

    There's going to be bias, in everything. Whatever paper you're citing was wrong to publish something like this (but from the other side) for the same reason--if we're going to say that sound bites and half-truths are "good enough" we're never going to get anywhere.
  2. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    Okay, so are we to assume that Mr. Pritchett has learned nothing in the intervening 10+ months?
  3. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    Okay, so are we to assume that President Obama has learned nothing in the intervening 10+ months?
  4. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    Has he sent an open letter to Pritchett?
  5. Liet

    Liet Dr. of Horribleness, Ph.D.

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    15,570
    Location:
    Evil League of Evil Boardroom
    Ratings:
    +11,723
    It's a lot harder than it used to be to assassinate the President if you want to live through the experience, but there's really nothing much that can stop a determined and capable suicide assassin. Determined and capable suicide assassins are, however, quite rare.
  6. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    Probably not.

    But his policies referenced by Mr. Pritchett have gone even more over the falls.
  7. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    In your opinion. I'd be more interested in whether Pritchett has written a follow up letter. Or if he's aware that something he wrote three months into a new administration has now become viral and been taken up as some sort of rallying cry.
  8. Volpone

    Volpone Zombie Hunter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    43,788
    Location:
    Bigfoot country
    Ratings:
    +16,269
    Why would he need to write a new letter? What has really changed? If anything, the letter is more accurate today than it was a year ago.
  9. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    In your opinion. Which is why you all are so enamored with this letter, because nothing in your minds has changed, ergo you'll keep passing this letter around until Zombie Reagan rises from the grave and picks Ron Paul as his running mate.
  10. Eminence

    Eminence Fresh Meat

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    Messages:
    2,328
    Ratings:
    +977
    I'll tell you what has changed. More and more people are starting to figure out that Obama cares more about a headline than he does about implementing good policy. So the letter bears repeating for those who might have missed it when it was first published because they were in a Koolaide stupor.

    Quick, somebody hit up that Hopium supply they have stocked up in Chicago before the jig is up! :diacanu:
  11. Zombie

    Zombie dead and loving it

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    45,044
    Ratings:
    +33,117
    Good lord......

    The feds must have WF on their favorites lists to keep an eye on....

    :lol:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. Muad Dib

    Muad Dib Probably a Dual Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    53,665
    Ratings:
    +23,779
    Nothing that anyone has noticed.
  13. LizK

    LizK Sort of lurker

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    10,031
    Ratings:
    +2,268
    Worse - he speaks to the public on national TV and radio.
    And THEY don't censor him or cut him off.
  14. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    Yeah, goddamn that First Amendment, anyway. :sroll:
  15. Muad Dib

    Muad Dib Probably a Dual Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    53,665
    Ratings:
    +23,779
    The First Amendment is supposed to be a two-way street.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. garamet

    garamet "The whole world is watching."

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    59,487
    Ratings:
    +48,916
    Yes, and -?
  17. LizK

    LizK Sort of lurker

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    10,031
    Ratings:
    +2,268
    So why was Lou censored by the Times and Obama not?
    IF it's a two way street and all.....
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Muad Dib

    Muad Dib Probably a Dual Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    53,665
    Ratings:
    +23,779
    ^ What Liz said!
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Zombie

    Zombie dead and loving it

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    45,044
    Ratings:
    +33,117
    Because the first amendment doesn't apply to anyone but the government. The New York Times doesn't have to give this man any time at all while giving Obama everything he wants.

    Don't make it right. Unethical as hell especially considering they claim to be "neutral and unbiased" but certainly not a violation of the first amendment.
  20. 14thDoctor

    14thDoctor Oi

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    31,009
    Ratings:
    +47,843
    Oh, come on. The first amendment in no way obligates newspapers to publish every letter sent to them. That kind of requirement would be the opposite of "freedom of speech."



    If the media covers every announcement Obama makes, it's probably because he's the President of the Unites States of America, and announcements made by the President of the Unites States of america tend to be of interest to people, no matter who the President is.
  21. Captain X

    Captain X Responsible cookie control

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    15,318
    Location:
    The Land of Snow and Cold
    Ratings:
    +9,731
    No one said that it should require them to do so, they're just pointing out the hypocrisy of how a newspaper like NYT might publish something like this letter if it was something a liberal wrote against Bush, but not one from a conservative against Obama. It's simply commentary on bias.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  22. Quincunx

    Quincunx anti-anti-establishment Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    20,211
    Location:
    Chicago, U.S.A.
    Ratings:
    +24,062
    http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/help/lettertoeditor.htm

    It's liberal censorship, I tells ya! :loltears:
    • Agree Agree x 2
  23. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    That's their policy, but I think it's in poor judgment.

    I rather like the idea of a newspaper being a gateway to an open forum. Much more civilized than this internet we have now.
  24. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    What I find sad is that science fiction magazines routinely publish letters from fans bitching and moaning about something that are many times the size of most newspaper letters to the editor.

    I had full page letters published at one time or the other published in Sci-Fi Universe, Cinescape, and Starlog.