Marso's Michelle Malkin thread got me thinking. Michelle Malkin, Sarah Palin, Anne Coulter... For an ideology that purports to be feminist, liberals sure spend a lot of time demonizing strong, opinionated hot women.
Anne Coulter is a vile, radioactive fucking ghoul. Cannot stand that woman. Palin is cute, but it'd take all of 5 minutes for her to get all Jesusy on you, so she's out. Don't know anything about Malkin other than her not making much of an impression.
I don't think it has anything to do with their gender, or race. It has to do almost completely with their political ideologies. Look at how they tend to react to just about anyone who happens to disagree with them and their ideologies for a dream utopia.
Skin thinks it has to do with liberals' desire to influence youth. Youth have already been conditioned over generations to dismiss anything their elders say. Mind you, not conditioned to think critically about it, but to simply dismiss it. Instead, they've been conditioned to listen to anything young, attractive people say. Michelle Malkin being relatively young and attractive presents the danger that youth might listen to her -- therefore, it's important to liberals that she and other relatively young, attractive conservative women be discredited as harshly as possible.
I get mine based off of their actions and statements for what they would like to do. Sort of like an out of control lame duck Congress that chose to vote on extending tax cuts only for some people in this country while discriminating against others. Even while their President was allegedly negotiating in good faith trying to reach a compromise.
Their best source is MSU...making shit up. One might as well take WF as an arbiter of ALL conservative/libertarian men's views on women.
At least we know where you get the majority of your ideas from. We have you to thank for that admission.
[action=garamet]challenges KIRK to refute Post #7, knowing he will start foaming at the mouth instead.[/action]
They aren't libertarians. I'd answer that liberals (classical, in my case) don't hate hot convervative vixens. Malkin, Palin, and Coulter are not hot vixens. Not even close.
Coulter and Palin are not hot vixens, no. Michelle Malkin definitely is. I agree with Albert about Coulter. She's just nasty. Palin is a MILF, plain and simple.
I just realized again that Palin was so much more qualified to be President* than the Obama. Alaska's better than half the size of the continental US. Looks to have more coastline to defend as well. It is bordered by a foreign nation on the East and, across a relatively narrow strait, by a nation we were in a state of cold war with for about half a century. It has copious natural resources and plenty of challenges to run. She was responsible for the National Guard and state law enforcement. Obama, on the other hand, has experience as a junior legislator and a professional big city rabble-rouser. He also wrote a brace of autobiographies. *Even though she was the VP candidate.
Well no matter how you cut it, Palin was in the executive as Governor of Alaska. Obama had done virtually nothing that required much of any level of management. He didn't even complete a single term in the US Senate.
Thank you for admitting you're too ignorant to (A) challenge me or (B) understand substantiations when presented. (Stick to neg-repping. You're REALLY good at that.)
Yeah, Coulter's not my thing. I mean, she's almost there with her cold, conservative, vindictive writings but I don't find her physically attractive. I'd knock the bottom out of her if it came between her and Hillary Clinton, of course.
She'd kinda almost have to be, wouldn't she? Even with her money, putting together enough booze to get a fella distorted enough to hit that would be expensive. All that pent up energy could probably power a small city for a week. Only way to hit that would be with proper safety gear -- three-ply polypropylene condom, blacked out goggles, lead-lined HAZMAT suit and a rescue harness. And for afterward, the number of her jockey on speed dial. Somebody's gotta lead her back to the stables.
You really didn't have to go ahead and illustrate my point, but thanks for doing it anyway! :santa_ok:
Not possible. I have a varied social network of friends and family with views from one end of the political spectrum to the other. My "ideas" about conservatives is that they are the same as liberals with a few minor differences and all are human. Conservatives on this board have said outright that their ideas about liberals puts them on par with the devil incarnate and could never be friends with people bent on destroying the country.