Uh.... have you not been paying attention to the news about him? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12295615
^ No, I hadn't. I've been gone for most of the past few months, and when I have been paying attention to the news about Italy, it is more about the financial crisis than who Berlusconi is playing around with. It must be said, my opinion of him is so low that I really don't care what he's doing. But now I at least understand what the doc was getting at. Thanks.
Y'know, I think what Mexico needs is some tutoring from Italy. Even Mafia violence is at least somewhat respectful of the public.
Oh, not this abhorrent man again. He's one to talk; who in their right mind would want to fuck him? On a side note, I thought it was rather amusing a few months ago when the attention whore was talking too loud (during was it a photo-op?) and Queen Elizabeth turned around and said to him, "there's no need to yell." Not quite up there with essentially telling Obama to shut up and put his drink down during the National Anthem, but one begins to speculate whether or not Thatcher is schooling her in the art of handling modern politicians. As for Merkel, I really doubt she even batted an eyelash over this. However, Berlusconi did go to school sometime over the last 70 years, right? If there is anything he should have learned, it's NEVER provoke a German. They have this way of going rogue when the right buttons are pushed. Nor is it ever smart to risk pissing off a woman. And if Italy is so shitty, he can move; he has the money to uproot himself. Go to Switzerland. They like everybody. Well that's a crock of bullshit too, but it is a wonderful tourist tagline.
A truism many seem to have forgotten -- you can beat the Germans down into the fucking mantle of the Earth, but once you hit that one fucking button, they will rise up, they will bring a shit-ton of that earth with them, and they will fucking bury your sorry ass under it. Let's not forget that these are the same mother fuckers whose ancestors tore the Roman fucking Empire apart like it was tissue paper. Believe it or not, they're not out to fuck up anybody else's shit -- but you even twitch wrong in the direction of their shit and they will have six empires down on the ground, on their backs and held by the fucking throats like misbehaved fuckin' dogs.
Nnnnnnh, well, kinda. I'm not sure that what you said really got the same "Don't poke the hornet's nest with a stick" message across.
Proof? It's already rising: [yt=They're waking again.]yUiIo0xidjU[/yt] Can't keep them fuckin' Krauts gelded forever. Sooner or later, they're going to be the one surviving Western civilization, after the rest of us have sunk into the mire and muck of surrender-monkey-ism and devolved just to survive as fragments in the resurgent primitivism of the third world.
Why would anyone want to fuck Hugh Hefner/Jack Nicholson/Mich Jagger/etc? He's rich and famous - it's not rocket science. And why is he so loud and egotistical? He's...from...Italy. Again, not a ground breaking revelation. Why does he want a 17 year old? He has a penis. To expound, watch your penile reaction waiting to pick up your daughter from High School versus picking up your wife from the quilting bee. See what I mean?
Hmmm... So they tapped his lines looking for evidence of corruption and found him saying derogatory things about a political rival/opponent in private. I'm assuming that that's the worst they found since there's no mention of actual corruption.
Tough to say, President Bush couldn't even give her a shoulder rub, so I'm gonna say no, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi hasn't a chance. Of course something may have been lost in translation, he might just be saying her ass is so large that sex isn't physically possible.
Depends on how you look at it. On one hand, he's "only talking shit" about an ally. On the other hand, he's engaged in crude and entirely inappropriate sexual discussion of a female head of state. It's all in the editorial bias. But, eh, since it's the German female head of state, all's fair, right? He could walk right up to her, level a pistol at her face and blow her brains out in a cascade of blood and gray matter all over a group of children, right? Because she's German, and that's all right, right?
Considering he is one of teh richest men in the world I can imagine quite a few do. The G20 last year if I recall. The Queen was quite capable of speaking her mind before Thatcher had ever come along. Some forget that she has been on the throne for 60 years. Going rogue? What does this even mean? There are more mafioso in Italy!
Well, I never said the Queen didn't speak her mind on occasion. But, she's far more open today than she's ever been in past. I dare to speculate, but I think you have Diana to thank for that. I don't think anybody caused that poor woman more personal strife than Charles's ex wife. It wasn't even something she was able to visibly conceal. She's not "Charles open." He's going to be an entirely different breed of monarch, so get yourself ready. But she IS much more apt today to turn around and say 'shut up' in a regal fashion than she was thirty years ago. Prince Charles just has Charles II and Queen Anne under his skin just scratching to get out. "Rogue" is a word we Americans use for defying all convention, and usually in a negative way. And can we agree that neither you nor I would put our mouths on Berlusconi regardless of how fat the check?
I disagree. Although it may not be obvious to the public based on press coverage at the time, she has always been very vocal to the Prime Minister of the day about her views. Diana had nothing to do with it. The only thing Diana did was to die and force the monarchy to break with convention and be more media friendly so the public thought they weren't out of touch. The Queen's views and approach towards Prime Ministers and other leaders did not change at all....and Diana remains, in royal circles, regarded as exactly what she was, a shallow media hugger. Yes indeed, but that is what went on behind closed doors and didn't have anything to do with the Queen's public or political approach. "Get yourself ready"? You do not need to convince any Britons that Charles will be a different type of Monarch. We are not all oblivious you know. No she isn't. The media just didn't report that sort of thing back then as it was thought such things would make the Monarch look bad. The Queen is renowned for having a sharp wit and for being sarcastic. Um, ok. So what, is Merkel going to invade Poland? Absolutely we can agree.....................well, unless it was about £50m. I might consider it then........
Whoa, let me jot this down.....women of all ages are attracted to rich, powerful men? First I've heard of it.
Gotta love Silvio. He lives like a Roman emperor. His country's economy is going down the pan but he's only interested in whoring and drinking.
Poor Addie. He was doped up during that entire war. I think the only pain he felt was the frustration that he was losing again. First the Vienna Art School, then the continent. I probably would have been so drugged to hell, I would have eaten cyanide and blown my head off too.
That eye tie isn't exactly good looking, either. He does have a point, Angela Merkel is not attractive.
He's 74, give him a break. The guy is a legend. Seriously, what other leader of a 'developed' country can get away with living like a rock star, banging hookers and bragging about it, owning and controlling half the nations media outlets, along with one of the biggest football teams in the world, all the while being afforded some semblance of legitimacy!! He really is living every despots dream! The fact that Italy are themselves nearly bankrupt and they will be dependant on a handout from Germany to keep them afloat makes it all even crazier.
