Oh, yeah, your implied secret genius you refuse to show others. Put up, or shut up. Otherwise, you're just Federal Farmer after going through assertiveness training.
In a year or two, the Libertarian Party is just gonna be a couple of maladjusted dudebros with a twitter account screaming about how the Marxist queers don't want you to know the truth about race and IQ. https://twitter.com/andrewrcraig/status/1570221971065163777?s=46&t=4SgHJtF2R4SztxL9kRN0ng
“America doesn’t matter. Country doesn’t matter. The ideals don’t matter. All that matters is absolute loyalty to THE PARTY.”
So what confused you about my post that you were unable to respond to a single point? Was it legislative body? Caucus? First Past the Post? Which concept do I need to break down… again… for you to better understand? And actually be able to respond to? Or as usual is the bumper sticker slogan all you got?
IOWs, all of it. Its not an 8 second sound bite, so he has no idea how to respond. Like you didn't expect it. Dude thinks AOC is "dumb" but can't tell us why cuz the memes don't explain it.
Regardless of how "it's supposed to work", Congress does not currently function that way. High school government classes do not give us the full information. Congress has evolved to focus on Party. So, you can dismissively poo poo about voting on party lines. But, if you truly want your ideals to be represented in Congress (they won't cuz they don't give a shit about the people anymore), then you vote for party. If you really want change, vote for people who support RepresentUS.org and other similar organizations. Because they are trying diligently to take our government back from the oligarchy.
If there's a "good guy" version of equating feminine traits with weakness, it should be easy to roll it out in a sentence minimum, a three sentence paragraph maximum. It shouldn't require a 3 screen sized calculus equation. It's not a huge ask. That you can't accomplish it says about you, not me, stop trying to flip it. For one, you suck at it.
Would you ever own up to being one if you were? Y'know like "whoops, dropped my keys in the sewer grate, butterfingers!". Or "jeez, how did I leave my belt in the freezer? What a knucklehead!". Y'know, so "wow, I'm crying about people's hair color in a thread about actual Nazis, what a screechbag!".
you're big on making burden of proof demands to cover up your own BS, aren't ya? Go look at your own posts since forever for the evidence that yeah, your go to opening is to feminize your perceived opponent is almost as certain as knight to H6 in response to a King's pawn opening.
it's hilarious that for years libertarians claimed that racism could be taken care of by the free market but the moment large firms "embraced" antiracism they abandoned the idea of a free market https://twitter.com/revhowardarson/status/1571665696291192833?s=46&t=TWLiV35RxvMNyNwgKGLLDA
I'm neither a democrat nor a republican, but rather a secret third thing (a republican) https://twitter.com/thejb_stan/status/1571650468056829953?s=46&t=TWLiV35RxvMNyNwgKGLLDA
The thing is, there is already a Libertarian Paradise directly south of the USA - Mexico Mexico has one of the lowest tax rates in the world, an even lower tax collection rate, a very limited government (and quite a toothless government at that), a free market with almost zero regulations, decriminalized drugs, dominance by the private sector and the government doesn't give two shits what you do so there is almost no government intrusion into one's life What could be the reason Libertarians aren't moving there en masse? Hmmmmm
Maybe living in a country where they can flush their used toilet paper instead of dumping it in a separate trash can more than they like the Mexican version of freedom?
If you think a failed narco-state is some kind of libertarian utopia, your cartoon strawmen have taken over your mental organ. A minimal government, prioritizing individual rights is not a surrender to lawlessness and violence.