Is this a version of 'some people are born lazy'? Nature or nurture, in your view?
Wouldn't the parties paying for the site be those 'keeping it afloat'?
Who was it said 'Go West, young man'? Subtle form of social engineering maybe?
Can anyone cite an example where libertarianism has actually been tried? Outside the early Xtian church, I mean.
It's called 'voting'.
Certainly true. One has actually existed frequently in human history.
Good point. But Americans in general seem to be infatuated with Sony products, for one. Actually the world is but the U.S. is no exception. True...
Then libertarianism would be no more effective than any other ism.
OK, another overlapping post. A police force comprised of libertarians. So there'd need to be a litmus test for joining the police.
That authority used to be the Golden Rule. 'Do unto others'. It's common to most if not all religions. But it starts from the premise that man is...
The Yanks seem to have a resistance to anything they haven't either invented themselves or taken credit for. Except for electronics and cars.
Like I said here http://wordforge.net/index.php?posts/2545859/ I've been lurking awhile.
The corporate sector is fond of saying 'a rising tide lifts all boats'.
Intriguing experiment. If implemented, if successful, I wonder if it will change anyone's mind?
International Workers of the World, familiarly known as 'Wobblies', something any student of social studies ought to know.
Bit late, innit? Isn't it traditional to accuse new members of being duals as soon as they arrive?
What would be a working definition of racism?
Would you prefer 'target'?
You're free to guess anything you want, even under the ACA. Imagine the creative things one might about you?
^Not sure what's in the vape pipe today, but if it's told you I'm Swedish, it's mistaken.
Your own words are what make you uncomfortable because you run away from them the minute you post them. 'I mean this'. 'No, I mean that'. 'No,...
Have you posted a blog entry here by mistake?
I've done a quick read of your posts, and this seems to be what you do any time a topic makes you uncomfortable. Nevermind then.
I'm asking you what you're talking about. If you don't know, I can't help you.
Which is it then--a more general concept of 'authoritarian' or specifically the ACA? If you expect discussion, it might help for you to settle on...
As that quote was a response to yet another of your 'everything is everything' posts, it's not clear you understand the concept of 'hype'.
So is this now a more general concept of 'authoritarian' or are you still on about the ACA?
Ordinarily there are two points in one, aren't there? ;)
Ah, so this is not about your perceiving the entire structure as authoritarian, and accusing some (which ones?) posters here of embracing some...
That doesn't say much about those of us who are here, though, does it?
I suspect your lad Starchaser would say 'they're all exactly the same'.
I've been lurking here for a while, even before the changeover, and I've noticed a great number of posters seem to rely on sloganism and not much...
So it doesn't matter to you which party, or that the voters made the choice?
Good review^. Saw the promo for this and was impressed. Now I know I want to see it.
As opposed to 'moderate left' socialists, I presume.
Always so specific, you.
http://www.johntreed.com/debate.html 'If a word having a dictionary definition proves it’s not vague, then every single word in the English...
Thank you.
Why do you disagree?
Who are the authoritarians?
Separate names with a comma.