“Grooming” - Every Conservative accusation is an admission

This podcast episode has more details on dude. Really sick fuck, and his CSAM stuff is the least of the skeevy things that he's accused of doing. Apparently, there's pics of him abusing underage kids in Colombia.

"At his arraignment, May’s lawyer suggested someone could have used the wifi password that was shown on a board behind a photo May’s wife may have posted online. Attorney Dayne Phillips also suggested investigators did not link each Kik message directly to May."

So ... somebody saw his wifi password in the background of a photo, then drove to his house and sat outside it, within range of his router, downloading kiddie porn in their car?

I know it's a defense lawyer's job to find absolutely anything they can, but damn, that's one hell of a stretch.

He should be executed. Immediately.

https://bsky.app/profile/reichlinmelnick.bsky.social/post/3ltn47wpfk22s

That he believed Trump would pardon him for child porn should say more than enough about who these people know Trump to be, and who these people are.

FF cheered his release.
I expect he'll keep avoiding this tread like a cloud of mustard gas.

Hey, @Steal Your Face , what do you have to say about this, anyway? Still support his release?
How about you, @Uncle Albert ? Still going to defend those pardons?

I don't recall specifically cheering this guy's release.

Since I said from the beginning each case should be judged on an individual basis, "defend those pardons" does not accurately summarize my take on that. As for this case, it sounds like he should have been prosecuted for the child pr0n in the first place, but people like you prefer the optics of making an example of the hhhhhhhhINSURRRRRRECTIONISTSTSTSTS(tm).

FF/UA- *Squirming like a plate of Gagh*

Undelete test by Bick

Huh; I had a post here.
Did I get stealth-modded, or did the server have a hiccup-fart?

Sorry.

I did it (or more accurately my pocket). I started a Shelter thread asking folks who know how this works to undo it.

did you inhale to much welding gas the child pr0n was not discovered until the search after the Jan 6 arrest. kinda hard to prosecute someone for something that you did not know about. it's is shame that the world has to still deal with you there is enough tedious idiocy already. so this guy was a insurrectionist and a child pronner and he was protesting that another child pronner was being treated mean.

Hilarious that you think it's okay to shoot someone dead for trespassing, unless it was on J6 on the Capitol.

Show me where I said it is ok to shoot someone for trespassing, you lying fuckstain. I really don't know what you think you have to gain from lying.

It took longer to bold that post than to find it.

I made a list!

Those were just innocent tourists who were looking for a bathroom!

So you admit I never said what you claimed. You lying fucking fraud.

LOL.
Do you think everyone is a stupid as you?

Happened last month, but another non-drag, non-trans, conservative pervert.

SC Rep. RJ May accused of distributing child sexual abuse material

@Bailey one of your feet hanger MPs.

NSW MP Gareth Ward found guilty of sexually abusing two young men

wow you said those exact words and you deny saying them right under a verbatim quote where you said it, motherfuck but you are one dumsumbitch (i retract that that can be fixed with a little edcuation a lack of character not so much) actually what this proves that you do not stand behind ANYTHING you say. you are a weasel and coward. STAND BEHIND WHAT YOU SAY. were you not taught that YOUR WORD is what you are judged by STAND BEHIND WHAT YOU SAY and finally STAND BEHIND WHAT YOU SAY if you don't then YOUR WORDS LIKE YOU MEAN NOTHING

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/25/giovanni-capriglione-affair-texas-house-republican/

https://www.christianpost.com/news/jason-yates-pleads-guilty-to-child-porn-possession.html

https://meidasnews.com/news/husband-of-wisconsin-trump-delegate-charged-with-child-porn

https://www.wyff4.com/article/forme...exual-assault-charges-north-carolina/65575445

Last time.

I said it was easy to avoid. That is not endorsing shooting trespassers by default. Two completely different propositions:

"These consequences are easy to avoid."
Versus,
"I agree with those consequences."

Not the same. Not interchangeable. Not telling you fucktards again.