I have no idea...

... if it's a dual or not, but it's quickly getting on my nerves.

http://www.wordforge.net/showthread.php?p=1119196#post1119196

Smells like rotten fish, that one. I wonder what surprises an IP check would bring.

A big one, the ip is from inside the place that colo's our webhosts server...

'zat so?

What're the implications there?

Also, Tamar, Chris, Lanz, I'd like to officially be able to approve and decline new members, as I'm probably in the AdminCP a lot more than the rest of y'all.

Oooo, I'd like to say no to that request. But I've no basis other than keeping policy and tech administration separated. A superior argument could prolly change my mind.

Agreed.

Traditionally it has been kept seperate because of Tech/Policy.

I'm in there almost every day since I came back. It seems to take some time between registrations and when they show up in the "waiting to be moderated" queue. The wait time isn't all that long.

Today's three contestants were all pimping something.

God, those fuckers are annoying.

I think new registrations is more technical than policy...

And to Tamar, no it hasn't been kept separate, I did it for a looong time.

I tend to agree that it's as much tech as policy, or even more, except in cases of Duals and banned members.

Eh.

I feel whoever gets to it first should get it done. I think territorality in BBS management is counter-productive unless it is for a good reason.

Veddy well, I am swayed by your arguments.

OK, that's settled, now on to the Clyde problem....

Hmmm . . . I don't seem to be able to make that change. I guess Elwood has to do it? Man, I need a manual or something . . .

What change?

Allowing O2C to approve requests for membership.

There's no setting for it, he already had the ability, just was using restraint in using it.

Ah, I see.

Carry on then.