I'm sick of goddamned streaming services

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by We Are Borg, Aug 9, 2017.

  1. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666


    [​IMG]
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666
  4. Shirogayne

    Shirogayne Gay™ Formerly Important

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    42,364
    Location:
    San Diego
    Ratings:
    +56,093
    To be honest, I had no idea private channels was a thing that could be done on Roku.
  5. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    Yeah, but isn’t that why computers were invented?
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  6. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666
  7. Steal Your Face

    Steal Your Face Anti-Federalist

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2013
    Messages:
    47,655
    Ratings:
    +31,687
    I like Chris Wallace, CNN? Come on Chris, you can do better than that.
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
  8. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    He could have done better than Fox...anyway, the gig is with CNN+ their new streaming service. It sounds like he's going to be doing a lot more than news interviews. Fox's spin is that his contract was up.
  9. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666
    Hopefully, he's seen what damage Fox and others are doing and thinks that on CNN+ he'll be able to do something about that, and not a case of him taking the job because they offered him a shitload of money and a share in the streaming service.
  10. Nyx

    Nyx Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    "Leaned."
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    Just got word from YouTubeTV that they may lose the Disney channels on Dec 17 if they can't reach a new agreement. I assume that includes all the ESPN's. They're promising a $15 discount if that happens until they get those channels back. Not bad when you consider that the Disney bundles is close to that. The ESPN + package is $6.99. Google might want to be careful because Disney might decide they're better off letting people pick it up separately than fussing with individual providers. Google vs. Disney..who you got? :goldeneye:
    • popcorn popcorn x 2
  12. Paladin

    Paladin Overjoyed Man of Liberty

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    50,154
    Location:
    Spacetime
    Ratings:
    +53,511
    3b32-64hptg0vzPcQLCEH0urVVGOsJ5Jq3obCzifNOw.jpg
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
  13. Fisherman's Worf

    Fisherman's Worf I am the Seaman, I am the Walrus, Qu-Qu-Qapla'!

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    30,586
    Ratings:
    +42,975
    Man, all these media empires are really encouraging a resurgence in piracy.
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  14. Nyx

    Nyx Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I wholeheartedly recommend it.

    I mean, support independent artists, and give back where you can, but Disney+? Netflix? Peacock? Take to the high seas (responsibly).
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    The late Sen. John McCain was an advocate for "a la carte" pricing, but with all the mergers to get what you want you'd still end up paying more than you're paying now. It's almost like they planned it that way...not that I'm saying it's a conspiracy or anything.... :waiting:
    • popcorn popcorn x 3
    • Angry Angry x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. Nyx

    Nyx Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    We have the cheapest, slowest internet service available (which is honestly still pretty fast), and the most basic cable package you can get (because if we unbundle it the price goes *up*), and it's still $130 a month. That is Spectrum, folks. God bless monopolies.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Sad Sad x 1
  17. shootER

    shootER Insubordinate...and churlish Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    49,343
    Location:
    The Steam Pipe Trunk Distribution Venue
    Ratings:
    +50,690
    I call them Speculum and refuse to do business with them. Thankfully there are several better options here.
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. Nyx

    Nyx Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    I wish we had them here. Rural Ohio has two choices: Spectrum, or satellite internet and TV. The equipment is several hundred dollars out of pocket, the subscription cost is three times as much, 1/5th as fast, and bandwidth capped. So it's not even a choice.
    • Sad Sad x 1
  19. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666
    While the equipment might be pricy, I don't think that the bandwidth is capped with Starlink. I don't have fiber, just DSL, and Starlink's got better speeds than I do (though not as good as I'd have with fiber).
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Nyx

    Nyx Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Interesting! It's not available here, yet, though they expect to start service sometime in 2022. Average speeds for our area (geographically speaking) would set it at about 65 Mbps at $99 a month. It also seems to be put on delay indefinitely, as people who have ordered are now being pushed back a year, two years. Plus, the network is already limited, despite not having many users. They will have to launch thousands more satellites to bring it up to handling even a couple hundred thousand people worldwide.

    Still, it is an interesting experiment, and I'll keep watching. :D
    • Agree Agree x 2
  21. Tererune

    Tererune Troll princess and Magical Girl

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    37,443
    Location:
    Beyond the Silver Rainbow
    Ratings:
    +26,907
    Do not ever go satellite internet. It is horrible. I was forced to do it once because DSL went all wonky and decided we were no longer serviceable, and cable would not go down a dirt road, so last option was the satellite. Holy shit was that a bad choice. I would rather have dial up again.
    • Love Love x 1
    • TL;DR TL;DR x 1
  22. Tererune

    Tererune Troll princess and Magical Girl

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2014
    Messages:
    37,443
    Location:
    Beyond the Silver Rainbow
    Ratings:
    +26,907
    WARNING! do not believe them. I did the starlink thing, and it was the worst shit ever. That cap is there, and the synch sucks ass for gaming and streaming. It is not what they say. It would actually be better to pay for cellular and hotspot things.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
    • TL;DR TL;DR x 1
  23. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,236
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,666
    Because, fuck you, that's why!
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
  24. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    It turns out that subscribing to ESPN + does not give you access to regular ESPN. :brood: So, I pulled the plug on YouTubeTV and switched to FUBO which has all the channels I usually watch and it has ROOT sports, which gives me Seattle sports which I did not have with YTTV. Gonna be an extra $10 a month, but I figure the YTTV price will go up anyway after they settle with Disney, so... :clyde:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  25. Shirogayne

    Shirogayne Gay™ Formerly Important

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    42,364
    Location:
    San Diego
    Ratings:
    +56,093
    What kind of nerd is gonna pay extra for CNN+? :lol:
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  26. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    :mystery:
    • Funny Funny x 1
  27. NAHTMMM

    NAHTMMM Perpetually sondering

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    14,689
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    Oh, it should be clear within a few months.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  28. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    YouTubeTV and Disney have settled their spat. Too bad, I've already switched to Fubo, which gives me more of what I want for a few $ more anyway. Whatever. Anyway, I put the over/under on how long it will be before YTTV jacks up it's monthly rate at 3 months. Place your bets! :twocents:
    • popcorn popcorn x 2
  29. Shirogayne

    Shirogayne Gay™ Formerly Important

    Joined:
    May 17, 2005
    Messages:
    42,364
    Location:
    San Diego
    Ratings:
    +56,093
    Wasn't there that Air America thing in the early 2010s that folded pretty quickly? They were trying to be FOX for liberals and collapsed fairly quickly.

    I figure it'd be the same shit here.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  30. MikeH92467

    MikeH92467 RadioNinja

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,340
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Ratings:
    +23,358
    That was radio and it was more like the early 2000's and it was a spectacular flop, which, along with the success of right-wing hate radio says a lot about their respective target audiences. To be fair, though, it should be pointed out that when Clear Channel, AKA iHeartRadio hoovered up all those stations, they kept the AM signals that were worth a shit. Air America not only had a product that nobody wanted to hear, they had such lousy signals that no one could have heard them anyway.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • popcorn popcorn x 1