It's Good News Friday! (CLIMATE CHANGE)

Tuckerfan · Aug 12, 2025

https://bsky.app/profile/mjgault.bsky.social/post/3lw7sjsbumc2t

Tererunererun · Aug 12, 2025

Steal Your Face said: ↑

Tuckerfan said: ↑

The Atlantic Hurricane Season Is About to Get Real
Click to expand...

Yes, every year around this time hurricanes happen. There still is no significant uptick in hurricanes and in fact they have been going down since the 1930s.
Click to expand...

Show your work.

Tuckerfan · Aug 13, 2025

https://www.carbonbrief.org/forests-taking-longer-to-recover-from-severe-megafires-since-2010/

Steal Your Face · Aug 13, 2025

Tererunererun said: ↑

Steal Your Face said: ↑

Tuckerfan said: ↑

The Atlantic Hurricane Season Is About to Get Real
Click to expand...

Yes, every year around this time hurricanes happen. There still is no significant uptick in hurricanes and in fact they have been going down since the 1930s.
Click to expand...

Show your work.
Click to expand...

Gladly.

The study suggests that the recent uptick in named storms can be explained by a number of factors, including observation bias. In other words, since the advent of satellites in the late 1960s, we’re able to see more storms than we could in the past, thus the storms of the past are likely underrepresented in the data.

“Due to changes in observing practices, severe inhomogeneities exist in this database, complicating the assessment of long-term changes. In particular, there has been a substantial increase in monitoring capacity over the past 170 years, so that the probability that a HU (Atlantic Hurricane) is observed is substantially higher in the present than early in the record,” the study states.

Moreover, the study concludes that hurricanes are likely not more powerful or more frequent than they’ve been in the past due to global warming.

“The homogenized basin-wide HU and MH (Major Hurricane) record does not show strong evidence of a century-scale increase in either MH frequency or MH/HU ratio associated with the century-scale, greenhouse-gas-induced warming of the planet.”
Click to expand...

The researchers were able to find no evidence of a larger-than-usual number of hurricanes in recent decades when compared to the old-school data. Indeed, it showed that the increase in hurricanes in current decades is similar to previous spikes in hurricane activity in the early 1880s and late 1940s. They also found no evidence that the storms of today are more intense than historical storms.

The researchers also conclude that the recent increase in storms is not a new record number of hurricanes but, rather, a rebound from a low number of hurricanes in the late 20th century.

“This homogenized record indicates that the increase in [North Atlantic] HU and MH frequency since the 1970s is not a continuation of century-scale change, but a rebound from a deep minimum in the late 20th century.”

The study’s authors were quick to point out that they couldn’t rule out a global-warming connection to hurricanes.

“Does this work provide evidence against the hypothesis that greenhouse-gas-induced warming may lead to an intensification of North Atlantic HUs? Not necessarily,” the study states.

They need to retain their access to funding, after all.

When climate alarmists use terms such as “record breaking,” you have to dig deeper to know exactly what they mean. Last year when they fretted about a “record number of named storms,” for instance, you have to realize that the naming of hurricanes only goes back to 1953. You also need to realize that there are a significant number of storms from the past that never made landfall and thus were not recorded prior to the satellite era, which only began in 1972.

In climate-change politics, presentation is everything. If they can’t scare you into believing that something unprecedented in the history of man is happening in the climate, their fear-mongering falls flat.
Click to expand...

https://thenewamerican.com/us/tech/...e-frequent-or-stronger-due-to-climate-change/
Here's a source with a chart.

Although this examination turns up little or no evidence to suggest landfalling hurricanes are increasing in frequency, there is some potential for increases in severity. There’s no question that warmer waters can fuel tropical cyclones, but warming air, and other atmospheric factors can counterbalance the effect of warmer seas. Volatility depends on the contrast in the two temperatures and the overall development of flows and pressure systems in the atmosphere. Late-season conditions (warm seas, cooler air) can be especially conducive to greater severity.

The best global body of knowledge on climate comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which says nothing definitive about global frequency and severity trends.

The most intense tropical cyclones are clearly the most relevant. One-third of the total number of landfalling hurricanes have produced approximately 80% of the damage up to 2017.1 Hurricanes with intensity above category 3 (defined by 1-minute averaged wind speeds over 111 MPH 33 feet above ground) are classified as ‘major’ events and are shown below for original (i.e., prior to use of reanalysis) and revised (yielded by reanalysis) events. Note the relatively recent period of complete coverage from satellite observation.
Click to expand...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/louisg...ugh-quite-real-isnt-spawning-more-hurricanes/
More charts
https://thegwpf.org/publications/global-hurricane-activity-not-getting-worse-new-report-confirms/
You can find some explanations as to why here.
https://iowaclimate.org/2022/02/22/why-arent-there-more-hurricanes/
Here's a chart that shows hurricanes have decreased by 50% since the 1930s.
https://www.drroyspencer.com/2018/09/u-s-major-landfalling-hurricanes-down-50-since-the-1930s/
Here's more charts.

Recorded century-scale NA hurricane changes
Neither the number of HU nor MH striking the USA are dominated by century-scale changes between 1851 and 2019, although each exhibits substantial year-to-year and decadal fluctuations (Fig. 1a, b). There is a decrease in the recorded number of USA HU strikes, that may be statistically significant for certain periods (e.g., Table 1) or depending on the statistical model used34. Hurricane data are available from 1851 onwards, but even for USA-striking HUs and MHs there are likely to be inhomogeneities including undersampling over this period. We show the data for the full 1851–2019 record, but highlight the pre-1878 era with dark gray background shading—as 1878 was the year in which the U.S. Signal Corps began systematic efforts to catalog all Atlantic HUs35. Furthermore, it is likely that U.S. coastal regions did not become sufficiently well-populated to fully monitor US-striking HUs and MHs until at least the year 1900 (ref. 36), so we highlight the 1878–1900 period with lighter gray shading in our figures. Basin-wide NA HU and MH frequency shows substantial year-to-year and multi-decadal variation, some of which is reflected in U.S. striking frequency (Fig. 1).
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Time-series of annual (colored lines) and 15-year running average (black lines) count of hurricanes (panels a and c; maximum wind speed ≥33 ms−1) and major hurricanes (panels b and d; maximum wind speed ≥50 ms−1) either striking the mainland United States of America (USA; panels a and b) or in the whole North Atlantic basin (panels c and d) from version 2 of the North Atlantic Hurricane Database (HURDAT2, ref. 33). Dark gray background shading between 1851–1877 indicates the period before the United States Signal Corps was tasked with recording all tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic (ref. 35), light gray background shading between 1878 and 1900 indicates the time before which it is estimated that all hurricanes striking the USA would have been recorded (ref. 36).
Click to expand...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24268-5

These "science" grifters are going off of computer models and theoretical guesses using worse case scenarios to instill fear and keep the money flowing. Honest scientists are using satellite data and rural temperature gauges as well as ice core samples that tell a completely different story about the climate and it goes completely against the alarmists' narrative.

More here.
https://iowaclimate.org/2021/07/27/...tic-are-not-more-frequent-than-in-the-past-2/

RickDeckard · Aug 13, 2025

I don't have keyboard access to go into detail on that but WOW. You're outdoing yourself with your quality sources this time!

Steal Your Face · Aug 14, 2025

RickDeckard said: ↑

I don't have keyboard access to go into detail on that but WOW. You're outdoing yourself with your quality sources this time!
Click to expand...

Here I am, rock you like a hurricane.

https://x.com/miltimore79/status/1436336549151531011

Steal Your Face · Aug 14, 2025

Tererunererun · Aug 14, 2025

Steal Your Face said: ↑

Tererunererun said: ↑

Steal Your Face said: ↑

Tuckerfan said: ↑

The Atlantic Hurricane Season Is About to Get Real
Click to expand...

Yes, every year around this time hurricanes happen. There still is no significant uptick in hurricanes and in fact they have been going down since the 1930s.
Click to expand...

Show your work.
Click to expand...

Gladly.

The study suggests that the recent uptick in named storms can be explained by a number of factors, including observation bias. In other words, since the advent of satellites in the late 1960s, we’re able to see more storms than we could in the past, thus the storms of the past are likely underrepresented in the data.

“Due to changes in observing practices, severe inhomogeneities exist in this database, complicating the assessment of long-term changes. In particular, there has been a substantial increase in monitoring capacity over the past 170 years, so that the probability that a HU (Atlantic Hurricane) is observed is substantially higher in the present than early in the record,” the study states.

Moreover, the study concludes that hurricanes are likely not more powerful or more frequent than they’ve been in the past due to global warming.

“The homogenized basin-wide HU and MH (Major Hurricane) record does not show strong evidence of a century-scale increase in either MH frequency or MH/HU ratio associated with the century-scale, greenhouse-gas-induced warming of the planet.”
Click to expand...

The researchers were able to find no evidence of a larger-than-usual number of hurricanes in recent decades when compared to the old-school data. Indeed, it showed that the increase in hurricanes in current decades is similar to previous spikes in hurricane activity in the early 1880s and late 1940s. They also found no evidence that the storms of today are more intense than historical storms.

The researchers also conclude that the recent increase in storms is not a new record number of hurricanes but, rather, a rebound from a low number of hurricanes in the late 20th century.

“This homogenized record indicates that the increase in [North Atlantic] HU and MH frequency since the 1970s is not a continuation of century-scale change, but a rebound from a deep minimum in the late 20th century.”

The study’s authors were quick to point out that they couldn’t rule out a global-warming connection to hurricanes.

“Does this work provide evidence against the hypothesis that greenhouse-gas-induced warming may lead to an intensification of North Atlantic HUs? Not necessarily,” the study states.

They need to retain their access to funding, after all.

When climate alarmists use terms such as “record breaking,” you have to dig deeper to know exactly what they mean. Last year when they fretted about a “record number of named storms,” for instance, you have to realize that the naming of hurricanes only goes back to 1953. You also need to realize that there are a significant number of storms from the past that never made landfall and thus were not recorded prior to the satellite era, which only began in 1972.

In climate-change politics, presentation is everything. If they can’t scare you into believing that something unprecedented in the history of man is happening in the climate, their fear-mongering falls flat.
Click to expand...

https://thenewamerican.com/us/tech/...e-frequent-or-stronger-due-to-climate-change/
Here's a source with a chart.

Although this examination turns up little or no evidence to suggest landfalling hurricanes are increasing in frequency, there is some potential for increases in severity. There’s no question that warmer waters can fuel tropical cyclones, but warming air, and other atmospheric factors can counterbalance the effect of warmer seas. Volatility depends on the contrast in the two temperatures and the overall development of flows and pressure systems in the atmosphere. Late-season conditions (warm seas, cooler air) can be especially conducive to greater severity.

The best global body of knowledge on climate comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which says nothing definitive about global frequency and severity trends.

The most intense tropical cyclones are clearly the most relevant. One-third of the total number of landfalling hurricanes have produced approximately 80% of the damage up to 2017.1 Hurricanes with intensity above category 3 (defined by 1-minute averaged wind speeds over 111 MPH 33 feet above ground) are classified as ‘major’ events and are shown below for original (i.e., prior to use of reanalysis) and revised (yielded by reanalysis) events. Note the relatively recent period of complete coverage from satellite observation.
Click to expand...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/louisg...ugh-quite-real-isnt-spawning-more-hurricanes/
More charts
https://thegwpf.org/publications/global-hurricane-activity-not-getting-worse-new-report-confirms/
You can find some explanations as to why here.
https://iowaclimate.org/2022/02/22/why-arent-there-more-hurricanes/
Here's a chart that shows hurricanes have decreased by 50% since the 1930s.
https://www.drroyspencer.com/2018/09/u-s-major-landfalling-hurricanes-down-50-since-the-1930s/
Here's more charts.

Recorded century-scale NA hurricane changes
Neither the number of HU nor MH striking the USA are dominated by century-scale changes between 1851 and 2019, although each exhibits substantial year-to-year and decadal fluctuations (Fig. 1a, b). There is a decrease in the recorded number of USA HU strikes, that may be statistically significant for certain periods (e.g., Table 1) or depending on the statistical model used34. Hurricane data are available from 1851 onwards, but even for USA-striking HUs and MHs there are likely to be inhomogeneities including undersampling over this period. We show the data for the full 1851–2019 record, but highlight the pre-1878 era with dark gray background shading—as 1878 was the year in which the U.S. Signal Corps began systematic efforts to catalog all Atlantic HUs35. Furthermore, it is likely that U.S. coastal regions did not become sufficiently well-populated to fully monitor US-striking HUs and MHs until at least the year 1900 (ref. 36), so we highlight the 1878–1900 period with lighter gray shading in our figures. Basin-wide NA HU and MH frequency shows substantial year-to-year and multi-decadal variation, some of which is reflected in U.S. striking frequency (Fig. 1).
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Time-series of annual (colored lines) and 15-year running average (black lines) count of hurricanes (panels a and c; maximum wind speed ≥33 ms−1) and major hurricanes (panels b and d; maximum wind speed ≥50 ms−1) either striking the mainland United States of America (USA; panels a and b) or in the whole North Atlantic basin (panels c and d) from version 2 of the North Atlantic Hurricane Database (HURDAT2, ref. 33). Dark gray background shading between 1851–1877 indicates the period before the United States Signal Corps was tasked with recording all tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic (ref. 35), light gray background shading between 1878 and 1900 indicates the time before which it is estimated that all hurricanes striking the USA would have been recorded (ref. 36).
Click to expand...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24268-5

These "science" grifters are going off of computer models and theoretical guesses using worse case scenarios to instill fear and keep the money flowing. Honest scientists are using satellite data and rural temperature gauges as well as ice core samples that tell a completely different story about the climate and it goes completely against the alarmists' narrative.

More here.
https://iowaclimate.org/2021/07/27/...tic-are-not-more-frequent-than-in-the-past-2/
Click to expand...

You're right. Hurricanes, by number and intensity haven't changed significantly over the last 120 years, or even since satellites started tracking them.

I tried to find evidence confirming my bias and failed.

Coral reefs on the other hand...

Steal Your Face · Aug 15, 2025

Tererunererun said: ↑

Steal Your Face said: ↑

Tererunererun said: ↑

Steal Your Face said: ↑

Yes, every year around this time hurricanes happen. There still is no significant uptick in hurricanes and in fact they have been going down since the 1930s.
Click to expand...

Show your work.
Click to expand...

Gladly.

The study suggests that the recent uptick in named storms can be explained by a number of factors, including observation bias. In other words, since the advent of satellites in the late 1960s, we’re able to see more storms than we could in the past, thus the storms of the past are likely underrepresented in the data.

“Due to changes in observing practices, severe inhomogeneities exist in this database, complicating the assessment of long-term changes. In particular, there has been a substantial increase in monitoring capacity over the past 170 years, so that the probability that a HU (Atlantic Hurricane) is observed is substantially higher in the present than early in the record,” the study states.

Moreover, the study concludes that hurricanes are likely not more powerful or more frequent than they’ve been in the past due to global warming.

“The homogenized basin-wide HU and MH (Major Hurricane) record does not show strong evidence of a century-scale increase in either MH frequency or MH/HU ratio associated with the century-scale, greenhouse-gas-induced warming of the planet.”
Click to expand...

The researchers were able to find no evidence of a larger-than-usual number of hurricanes in recent decades when compared to the old-school data. Indeed, it showed that the increase in hurricanes in current decades is similar to previous spikes in hurricane activity in the early 1880s and late 1940s. They also found no evidence that the storms of today are more intense than historical storms.

The researchers also conclude that the recent increase in storms is not a new record number of hurricanes but, rather, a rebound from a low number of hurricanes in the late 20th century.

“This homogenized record indicates that the increase in [North Atlantic] HU and MH frequency since the 1970s is not a continuation of century-scale change, but a rebound from a deep minimum in the late 20th century.”

The study’s authors were quick to point out that they couldn’t rule out a global-warming connection to hurricanes.

“Does this work provide evidence against the hypothesis that greenhouse-gas-induced warming may lead to an intensification of North Atlantic HUs? Not necessarily,” the study states.

They need to retain their access to funding, after all.

When climate alarmists use terms such as “record breaking,” you have to dig deeper to know exactly what they mean. Last year when they fretted about a “record number of named storms,” for instance, you have to realize that the naming of hurricanes only goes back to 1953. You also need to realize that there are a significant number of storms from the past that never made landfall and thus were not recorded prior to the satellite era, which only began in 1972.

In climate-change politics, presentation is everything. If they can’t scare you into believing that something unprecedented in the history of man is happening in the climate, their fear-mongering falls flat.
Click to expand...

https://thenewamerican.com/us/tech/...e-frequent-or-stronger-due-to-climate-change/
Here's a source with a chart.

Although this examination turns up little or no evidence to suggest landfalling hurricanes are increasing in frequency, there is some potential for increases in severity. There’s no question that warmer waters can fuel tropical cyclones, but warming air, and other atmospheric factors can counterbalance the effect of warmer seas. Volatility depends on the contrast in the two temperatures and the overall development of flows and pressure systems in the atmosphere. Late-season conditions (warm seas, cooler air) can be especially conducive to greater severity.

The best global body of knowledge on climate comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which says nothing definitive about global frequency and severity trends.

The most intense tropical cyclones are clearly the most relevant. One-third of the total number of landfalling hurricanes have produced approximately 80% of the damage up to 2017.1 Hurricanes with intensity above category 3 (defined by 1-minute averaged wind speeds over 111 MPH 33 feet above ground) are classified as ‘major’ events and are shown below for original (i.e., prior to use of reanalysis) and revised (yielded by reanalysis) events. Note the relatively recent period of complete coverage from satellite observation.
Click to expand...

https://www.forbes.com/sites/louisg...ugh-quite-real-isnt-spawning-more-hurricanes/
More charts
https://thegwpf.org/publications/global-hurricane-activity-not-getting-worse-new-report-confirms/
You can find some explanations as to why here.
https://iowaclimate.org/2022/02/22/why-arent-there-more-hurricanes/
Here's a chart that shows hurricanes have decreased by 50% since the 1930s.
https://www.drroyspencer.com/2018/09/u-s-major-landfalling-hurricanes-down-50-since-the-1930s/
Here's more charts.

Recorded century-scale NA hurricane changes
Neither the number of HU nor MH striking the USA are dominated by century-scale changes between 1851 and 2019, although each exhibits substantial year-to-year and decadal fluctuations (Fig. 1a, b). There is a decrease in the recorded number of USA HU strikes, that may be statistically significant for certain periods (e.g., Table 1) or depending on the statistical model used34. Hurricane data are available from 1851 onwards, but even for USA-striking HUs and MHs there are likely to be inhomogeneities including undersampling over this period. We show the data for the full 1851–2019 record, but highlight the pre-1878 era with dark gray background shading—as 1878 was the year in which the U.S. Signal Corps began systematic efforts to catalog all Atlantic HUs35. Furthermore, it is likely that U.S. coastal regions did not become sufficiently well-populated to fully monitor US-striking HUs and MHs until at least the year 1900 (ref. 36), so we highlight the 1878–1900 period with lighter gray shading in our figures. Basin-wide NA HU and MH frequency shows substantial year-to-year and multi-decadal variation, some of which is reflected in U.S. striking frequency (Fig. 1).
Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Time-series of annual (colored lines) and 15-year running average (black lines) count of hurricanes (panels a and c; maximum wind speed ≥33 ms−1) and major hurricanes (panels b and d; maximum wind speed ≥50 ms−1) either striking the mainland United States of America (USA; panels a and b) or in the whole North Atlantic basin (panels c and d) from version 2 of the North Atlantic Hurricane Database (HURDAT2, ref. 33). Dark gray background shading between 1851–1877 indicates the period before the United States Signal Corps was tasked with recording all tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic (ref. 35), light gray background shading between 1878 and 1900 indicates the time before which it is estimated that all hurricanes striking the USA would have been recorded (ref. 36).
Click to expand...

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-24268-5

These "science" grifters are going off of computer models and theoretical guesses using worse case scenarios to instill fear and keep the money flowing. Honest scientists are using satellite data and rural temperature gauges as well as ice core samples that tell a completely different story about the climate and it goes completely against the alarmists' narrative.

More here.
https://iowaclimate.org/2021/07/27/...tic-are-not-more-frequent-than-in-the-past-2/
Click to expand...

You're right. Hurricanes, by number and intensity haven't changed significantly over the last 120 years, or even since satellites started tracking them.

I tried to find evidence confirming my bias and failed.

Coral reefs on the other hand...
Click to expand...

They’re making a comeback.

In 2019, despite increasingly frequent bleaching events, the amount of coral on the world's reefs increased by 2 per cent.
Click to expand...

https://www.unep.org/interactives/status-world-coral-reefs/

Steal Your Face · Aug 15, 2025

Bailey · Aug 15, 2025

Steal Your Face said: ↑

View attachment 91750
Click to expand...

It's promising, but doesn't necessarily mean much. Whenever you have an ecological niche cleared out, something will colonise it. In this case the conditions of space being opened up by the death of lots of the reef means that a smaller subset of fast growing corals have been growing and taking over.

That can be a good thing, as they act as the frontier species, before others more slowly and later follow.

It can also be bad, as they quickly take up space stopping a larger variety of ones from having space. These fast growing species also tend to be more susceptible to environmental pressures, so historically they have been among the first to see mass die backs as well.

It's like flying over a forest where the existing trees have been destroyed via fire, and pointing to all the green from grass and new seedlings as a sign that things are better than ever because the forest floor is greener than it was before the fire.

Tuckerfan · Aug 17, 2025

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/17/new-canada-wildfires-locations

Tererunererun · Aug 17, 2025

Steal Your Face said: ↑

View attachment 91750
Click to expand...

I'm glad if the south Pacific is doing well. The Caribbean crashed. I'm speaking from personal observation over 10 years regularly diving Pennekamp state park off Largo.

Tuckerfan · Aug 17, 2025

https://archive.is/faXWc

Tuckerfan · Aug 17, 2025

Record warm seas help to bring extraordinary new species to UK waters

Tuckerfan · Aug 17, 2025

Southern European butterfly spotted in UK for first time

Tuckerfan · Aug 21, 2025

https://archive.is/CRKXI

Diacanu · Aug 21, 2025

I was born in a deadly heat wave.

matthunter · Aug 21, 2025

Diacanu said: ↑

I was born in a deadly heat wave.
Click to expand...

I was born in a crossfire hurricane.

To this day, no-one has been able to explain what a crossfire hurricane actually IS (I think there's a rum and an FBI operation named after it?), but me and Mick Jagger both - so it must exist, right?!

Tuckerfan · Aug 23, 2025

Industry-managed forests more likely to fuel megafires

Tuckerfan · Aug 23, 2025

On this date, in 1856, a paper describing "the greenhouse effect" was read before a meeting of the American Academy for the Advancement of Science.

notnick · Aug 23, 2025

matthunter said: ↑

Diacanu said: ↑

I was born in a deadly heat wave.
Click to expand...

I was born in a crossfire hurricane.

To this day, no-one has been able to explain what a crossfire hurricane actually IS (I think there's a rum and an FBI operation named after it?), but me and Mick Jagger both - so it must exist, right?!
Click to expand...

crossfire hurricane...when the bullets are blowin by ya from all directions! or in my case tree limbs but bullets sound sexier

Tuckerfan · Aug 24, 2025

Climate Change Likely to Expand the Range of an Asian Bat and the Deadly Disease it Carries

Tuckerfan · Aug 25, 2025

‘We cannot do it the way our fathers did’: farmers across Europe struggle to adapt to the climate crisis

RickDeckard · Aug 29, 2025

Collapse of critical Atlantic current is no longer low-likelihood, study finds

Happy Friday, global arsonists!

Tuckerfan · Aug 31, 2025

https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000610

Diacanu · Aug 31, 2025

Tuckerfan said: ↑

View attachment 92340

https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000610
Click to expand...

(As UA)
They didn't do enough jumping jacks and kettle bells.

Tuckerfan · Sep 1, 2025

https://www.abc15.com/news/local-ne...y-may-be-overlooking-many-heat-related-deaths

Uncle Albert · Sep 2, 2025

Diacanu said: ↑

Tuckerfan said: ↑

View attachment 92340

https://journals.plos.org/climate/article?id=10.1371/journal.pclm.0000610
Click to expand...

(As UA)
They didn't do enough jumping jacks and kettle bells.
Click to expand...

Wouldn't hurt them to try.

Tuckerfan · Sep 4, 2025

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/sep/04/joe-rogan-climate-cooling-misinformation

Log in or Sign up

It's Good News Friday! (CLIMATE CHANGE)

Tuckerfan BMF

Tererunererun Troll princess and Magical Girl

Tuckerfan BMF

Steal Your Face Dead

RickDeckard Socialist

Steal Your Face Dead

Steal Your Face Dead

Tererunererun Troll princess and Magical Girl

Steal Your Face Dead

Steal Your Face Dead

Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Administrator

Tuckerfan BMF

Tererunererun Troll princess and Magical Girl

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

matthunter Ice Bear

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

notnick lost, as usual

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

RickDeckard Socialist

Tuckerfan BMF

Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

Tuckerfan BMF

Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

Tuckerfan BMF

Log in or Sign up

It's Good News Friday! (CLIMATE CHANGE)

Tuckerfan BMF

Tererunererun Troll princess and Magical Girl

Tuckerfan BMF

Steal Your Face Dead

RickDeckard Socialist

Steal Your Face Dead

Steal Your Face Dead

Tererunererun Troll princess and Magical Girl

Steal Your Face Dead

Steal Your Face Dead

Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Administrator

Tuckerfan BMF

Tererunererun Troll princess and Magical Girl

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

matthunter Ice Bear

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

notnick lost, as usual

Tuckerfan BMF

Tuckerfan BMF

RickDeckard Socialist

Tuckerfan BMF

Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

Tuckerfan BMF

Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

Tuckerfan BMF

Useful Searches