I feel kinda bad for the lady who got whacked with the chair by the chair-dude. The commentators rightly said "he's going to jail" after that - sure she was part of it, but she was already down due to the ladies on the other side (which was entirely her own fault), unlike the guy who got a chaircut.
Knowing anything about US history, and especially history in the south is usually enough. Seriously, why do you do this? Is it just to stir shit? It's like the Charlottesville Unite the Right riots with the Tiki Torch Nazis. There were conservatives saying "how do you know they were Nazis?" as if we all just got off the boat and had never seen bigoted white men before.
In Billy’s defense he knows lots of entitled white people that would jump an old black security guard 4-1 just for doing his job and telling them to move and Billy doesn’t know any fascists so therefor these folks can’t be fascist.
I do it because we don’t know any details other than a bunch of drunk white people beat up a black man for simply doing his job. And before you ask, no, I don’t condone their behavior. We see the left automatically jump to conclusions time and time again without any information. We also see the left’s overuse of the word fascist when they label zero information about these people.I’m saying that what these people did was right, I’m asking how anyone knows that these people are fascists?
Who says they were drunk? Are YOU stereotyping? Besides, I've been SO fucking drunk in my life, and yet I've never felt the need to gang up on anyone, let alone someone of another colour. It's almost like they needed an excuse. Which being drunk isn't. If indeed they were.
You are Cannuckistani so not sure if you know this or not but the original meme was a reference to Woody Guthrie’s (Depression Era American Folk singer/musician) guitar:
Not "we" don't know the details, you don't know the details. You also don't know the context of the history that leads to these clashes, and so when you see them, you side with the "moderate white man" status quo position of "we need to wait until we hear enough evidence," but there will never be enough evidence. Never. Because it's not about evidence, it's about blaming all black people for one black person's behavior, while making sure groups of white people are only judged on an individual basis. 1 black man represents all black people. 1 white man represents 1 white man who was pushed too far. Sometimes waiting for more information is good. There are other times where it just reinforces the system and protects the oppressor. This is the latter, and you need to learn how to recognize it. Exactly. Justification always seems to come down to the majority skin color. Funny that.
