Trump FARCing about, or Murky Meetings at Mar-a-Lago

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by matthunter, Apr 22, 2017.

  1. matthunter

    matthunter Ice Bear

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    26,935
    Location:
    Bottom of the bearstack, top of the world
    Ratings:
    +48,616
    http://crooksandliars.com/2017/04/secret-meeting-mar-lago-raises-questions

    So, on the eve of a forthcoming meeting with Colombian leader Santos to discuss US backing (and foreign aid) regarding a peace deal with the FARC, two former Colombian Presidents opposed to the deal "just happened" to be at Mar-a-Lago and bumped into Trump. Now the White House says this was just a hello:

    No word on which member got them access, but oddly enough Marco Rubio is strongly opposed to the deal as well and is rumoured to have organised the visit.

    This is where the Mar-a-Lago thing gets dodgy - folk with cash and connections can have a damn good chance of rubbing shoulders with the POTUS because he's there all the damn time, and it can be kept off-record (except for whoever got word of this one to the press). Regardless of whether the FARC deal is a good idea or not, it's supposed to be a bipartisan process but you've got Rubio pushing a pair of political gamers into Trump's path to undercut the actual President ahead of time.

    And we wouldn't have heard about it except for the fact that Mar-a-Lago is ALSO as leaky as an 80-year old's prostate. Neither situation is ideal, however.
    • popcorn popcorn x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
  2. Dinner

    Dinner 2012 & 2014 Master Prognosticator

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    37,536
    Location:
    Land of fruit & nuts.
    Ratings:
    +19,361
    The reason the previous peace attempt got voted down by Colombian voters was because the President wanted to offer amnesty to all manner of left wing criminals who had committed horrible crimes including mass murder, mass rape, and terrorism. The Colombian people demanded that those crimes not be swept under the rug and that the guilty face justice for their actions.

    It is very arrogant of you to tell them they are wrong and to try to dictate what happens in their own country. I guess that just means it is a day ending in "y" though.
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
  3. matthunter

    matthunter Ice Bear

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    26,935
    Location:
    Bottom of the bearstack, top of the world
    Ratings:
    +48,616
    Read my post carefully, asswipe. I've said it is up to the Colombian people, but following a bipartisan process.

    It should NOT be up to political powerplayers using cash for access to the US President in what was clearly meant to be a secret negotiation.
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
  4. matthunter

    matthunter Ice Bear

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    26,935
    Location:
    Bottom of the bearstack, top of the world
    Ratings:
    +48,616
    Apropos of this, apparently the State Department has been plugging Mar-a-Lago on its website.... Yep, taxpayer dollars going to adverts for Trump's business holdings.
    • Dumb Dumb x 1