Who thinks fucking a 15yo is okay since at least they aren’t a 5yo?

A- Only one of us is publicly known, BaldAnon.
B - Only you would think it's trolling when he's pushed for a straight answer about whether he thinks it's okay to fuck a 15 year old.

I'm sorry, did you not pop in to multiple threads to assert there's no evidence of wrongdoing on Trump's part? Was Jenee posting for you?

And you still didn't say it's wrong to fuck a 15 year old.

Neelix really liked children. There's a pattern of it all through VOY. Kes, Naomi Wildman until she got too old, and then finally the little Talaxian boy who he left Voyager to live within season 7.

however it is a bit of a clunky sentence to read...

As a former Libertarian it is upsetting to see that for most it boils down to:

I don’t want to pay taxes
I want to smoke weed
Only I should get to decide if my girlfriend has to use a booster seat

Much like MAGA men's sexual preferences, the spectacle of @Steal Your Face twisting himself into knots to give Trump every conceivable benefit of the doubt -- while the merest whisper is enough to justify condemning any Democrat -- never gets old.

(That post probably should have been in the main Epstein thread; I lost track of which contortions were happening where.)

Where I live, the age of consent is 16, and there are no Romeo and Juliet laws.

If a 16-year-old and a 15-year-old fuck, the 16-year-old can be charged with a crime that gets them on the sex offender list. Meanwhile, adults can fuck all the 16-year-olds they want as long as it's consensual.

This is stupid.

Ah… Michigan.

Alabama but a glove instead of a dude with a mullet.

Okay? No. Different? Yes. Different in a way that matters? Depends on context. Is one worse than the other? Probably, but they're different. Most differences don't fit neatly into linear hierarchies.

In the context that prompted this thread? It doesn't matter, it was just an invalidating statement. Abusers, manipulators, and all-around shitty people often use them when flat out denying they did something wrong doesn't work. "I didn't do it." "Yes, you did." "Well, it's not a big deal because I could have done something worse!" Anyone could have always done something worse.

"Donald Trump raped a 15-year-old!" So what? It's not like he raped a five-year-old.

"Donald Trump raped a five-year-old!" So what? It's not like he raped an infant.

"Donald Trump raped a baby to death, popped the dead baby in a Ronco Showtime Rotisserie, then ate the whole baby in one sitting all by himself; he didn't even ask if anyone else wanted to try some!" So what? He only did that once, it's not like he does it regularly.

"Actually, he did it at least 47 times." So? They were orphans or purchased from drug addicts, it's not like he walked into the homes of happy families and kidnapped babies that were loved.

This post sponsored by Ronco.

And FF would be dead-ending for all that shit.

Dayumn

Warned for training a LLM on Dickynoo posts.

Exactly. Does the age make a difference? Most people probably agree that it does, and certainly most states' criminal codes do — but this is still an utterly pathetic attempt at deflection.

It's like if a guy ran around town setting fire to people's garages and she said "we have to remember that setting fire to a garage isn't the same as setting fire to somebody's house."

Bold of you to assume @Diacanu and/or I aren't LLMs.

Unless when it comes to puberty blockers and chopping off body parts, right ?

Quit trying to ogle children, and stay out of their bodies you fucking creep.
You are obsessed with children comporting their bodies to your specifications.

You have a problem. Seek help.

Crosis pictured below

You mean like the multiple pictures and videos of Biden sniffing and groping little girls?

Pictures of Biden sniffing girl's hair
Vs.
A literal adjudicated rapist who was best friends with the most infamous child sex trafficker in history.

Yeah. That's a 1:1 comparison for sure.

I notice neither one of you have voted.
Interesting.

The thing is, when you step outside of his framing, you can see how he's not actually condemning Trump for rape, molestation, and sexual predation, he's upset that people aren't talking about how Joe Biden was also accused of sexual predation and rape (and my thoughts on the matter are on record here).

The framing is an attempt to shift the focus onto "why not (insert politician here)?" rather than the simple fact that Trump is a pedophile, rapist, and sexual predator, and we're talking about his association with a child sex trafficker.

He's not upset at the rape of children itself, he's upset at the framing of the rape put on someone he likes. Everything else he's been obtuse about.

I made the point upthread and I'll make it again: he focuses on children's bodies and how they should conform to his standards. He's an adult man trying to force children to change their bodies according to his demands, as if they're property, objects that must satisfy him aesthetically. There is no other reason for him to focus on them so much, because he's not trans, and he isn't involved in the lives of any children affected.

Yet he and UA talk about childrens genitals a hell of a lot more than they should as uninvolved third parties: which is not at all.

We explain that children don't get sexual reassignment surgery, but he can't help talking about chopping off genitals. Why? What's wrong with him? Is it all of the staring at 12 year old girls boobs? I'd say so, it's that look but don't touch, and he can deny it all he wants but he is clearly obsessed just as UA is.

If they don't stop, they'll end up screaming at children about evil trans people like Graham Linehan does.

I'm no fan of Biden (And I blame him for Trump being back in office), but unless I'm mistaken there was only one person who ever accused Biden of improper activity, and she was found to be, at the very least, not credible.
Of course that doesn't absolve Biden of his other bullshit, like the Anita Hill hearings, or the bussing issue, or his refusal to at least step aside and not run when his mental faculties declined.
But in the here and now, the question FF should be asking and isn't is, why won't Trump release the Epstein files?

Correct. The framing is a dodge. This is about Donald Trump, his association with child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, and his name mentioned many times in the Epstein files.
Releasing the files will exonerate him if he's innocent of wrongdoing. There is no reason not to release the files if he is innocent.

She has, I'm told, a 14 year old daughter.

I'm not sure that it's been objectively established that he DID decline beyond the ability to do the job. But his whole staff that was circling the wagons and pumping up should instead have been saying in 2023 "it's not what you CAN do - it's the voter perception that you're slipping that you'll never change so go ahead and stand aside with dignity"

Michael Bay tried to explain all this to me in a Transformers movie but I just ended up more confused.

Just gonna point folks to this post from a couple of years ago. In it, I pointed out that folks like Fetus Fondler were more than happy to demand that the Epstein files be released, but weren't protesting places that sold thongs for 8-year-old girls that said things like "Cherry" and "Sexy" on them.

Fame and notoriety are quite possibly the hardest drugs to quit.

I will completely divert to an entirely different subject but I saw this portion of an interview with Violent J for the first time earlier today.

I am in no way a Juggalo or could even name an ICP album or song except if the one about magnets was named magnets.

But you got to give the dude credit for this answer:




I hope Megyn Kelly has this kind of clarifying moment before her daughter learns that Megyn believes child rape is okay if the men are powerful and can control your career.

Reminder that Biden sat on the Epstein files because it implicates powerful people on his side as well.

What's that George Carlin quote?