So, the Left's mantra has been "the solution to gun violence isn't more guns." That's the justification for rejecting calls for armed security at schools. Thing is, armed security iis a pervasive element of American life. Every bank has armed security. Movie theaters have armed security. Every federal and state government office has armed security. Airports, hospitals, sporting events, concerts...all have armed security. Yet, for some reason, the idea of armed security at schools sends liberal bedwetters into paroxysms. The schools that won't support the idea are obviously making a calculated choice about who they fear being sued by the most. Are they afraid of getting sued by the family of a student who gets accidentally shot by security or an armed teacher? Or are they afraid of getting sued by the family of a dead student because they were negligent in failing to provide every security measure possible to stop a crazed shooter? Seems cold that you would be o.k. with armed security protecting your money, but not your children at school. I guess it shows what you value more.