Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Dayton Kitchens, Jun 1, 2019.
Either way, why is it unreasonable?
I thought being in a position of power where they could ban or restrict a member's posting here implied that they would (or should) observe some degree of neutrality. Not saying they shouldn't express opinions. Not even saying they should prevent personal insults directed at members. But it seems to me they should avoid insulting members themselves.
Why is that unreasonable?
Because it is clearly true and not an opinion that you are a moron.
I have evidence to the contrary.
No, you don't. However, there is a decade of collective evidence online from multiple places, and your work history to show the truth.
Who's trying to stop you?
I'm sharing my views which are every bit as valid as yours, I just can't fathom why on Earth you'd be so upset about someone elses' sex life.
To me it's simple, if people are happy and doing no harm then I'm happy for them.
@Dayton3 and republicans want to punish women for having sex. They want to regulate what happens in the privacy of people's bedrooms between consenting adults. This is why they oppose gay sex, sodomy, and wish to use babies as some form of punishment for women having sex. It is why prostitution is illegal, and they oppose multiple partner sexual activities. It is also why porn is attacked, and why they use religion to pretend their busybody mentality is justified by god when really they are just nasty fuckers as trump would say.
How does stopping elective abortions punish women for having sex? That is the stupidest argument supporters of abortion rights ever love to trot out. If I or others wanted to "punish" people for having sex we would simply supporting reinstituting the laws against sodomy that were common in the U.S. well up into the 1980s.
Not a single sexual activity you refer to in your post has any benefits to people whatsoever.
You want to force raising a child on women by denying them the choice to not have a child through abortion, and even through making BC illegal. It is quite obvious that is the reasoning behind it as you have absolutely no care for life being pro-war and pro-death penalty, nor do you wish to punish men for being part of an abortion considering you cannot have an abortion without male activity yet.
This is not to mention your love for sodomy laws which would totally destroy your stance that if you wanted to punish women for sex you would have them. It was not republican's choice to be rid of those laws they valued so much. It was a court decision which told you to get out of the bedroom of consenting adults and stop punishing people for consensual sex.
You are a terrible liar and hopelessly addicted to stupid pills.
Oh, and all consensual and healthy sex benefits people and is good even without children.
What makes you think I'm opposed to birth control? I have no problems whatsoever with almost all forms of birth control. My wife and I even used a couple of them.
Though we joke about it your face is not considered birth control, nor does having it constitute having no problems with birth control.
In other words you have nothing but insults. Typical. You know sometimes I think its too bad you were banned from PoliticalForum.com for that crap.
And you were banned from several boards for the same shit you pull here. What a pity.
Don't malign me for being banned from the TrekBBS. It's banned members from there that created this forum.
I was not banned from political forums. You were the one who was warned for playing your same old drama game because the mods there would have no part of it.
I was never banned form trekBBS. Still have the account I created.
You were banned from TrekBBS. What a pity
Nobody cares, bed wetter. Life is hard, wear a helmet.
This is the Red Room, bitch tits. This is the only forum where people don’t have to pretend to tolerate your business.
I misbehaved to get banned on purpose so I'd never be tempted to go back, and could close that chapter of my online life.
It really took some doing.
Dayton really blows goats if his regular room temperature personality got him kicked out.
I got banned from there as well. Pretty much expected to at the time, Haven't missed it, still don't, doubt if I'll want to go back as a regular user.
I am assuming the helmet thing is a bit too late.
This post made me scroll back up to like Dr. Kriegs post.
Dayton's just mad that the others on staff don't have my temperment.
Guess what, Dayton, I'm the outlier here.
Both in one night and you still conceived a daughter?
Lemme guess - you swallowed the pill and she put the condom on?
Yes but we are to all aspire to the office of Elder and scripture teaches that elders are to be the husband of one wife.
Aspiring does not mean being one or having the responsibilities or restrictions of one, as you and your Christian people are so fond of telling others. That is before we define what an "elder" is in accordance with the fictional bible. Since many Christians avoid inconvenient tasks associated with their religion are you really aspiring to be the biblical definition of an elder especially if it involves dietary and other restrictions none of you ever bother to even try to aspire to, like charity, not killing, not stealing, not coveting, not bearing false witness, being forgiving, and turning the other cheek?
You might aspire to be "better" people as you chose to define them, but certainly you are not trying to follow any Christian values when you idolize murderers, slavers, rapists, nazis, and other nefarious things like president trump and your confederate traitors. Seems to me you should be giving up that ghost and having multiple wives because you are probably not making the elder list.
Separate names with a comma.