Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Shirogayne, Nov 5, 2016.
Per @gul 's suggestion in M. Bison's thread.
Ahh, my very own call out thread. :love:
At the very least it will be useful in identifying who does not know what racism means.
Shit, this was supposed to be an open poll showing names. But I'm sure we can guess who voted what anyway *cough* Ramen and M. Bison *cough*.
a group of persons related by common descent orheredity.
a population so related.
(no longer in technical use) any of the traditional divisions of humankind, the commonest being the Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negro,characterized by supposedly distinctive and universal physical characteristics.
an arbitrary classification of modern humans,sometimes, especially formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.
a socially constructed category of identification based on physical characteristics, ancestry,historical affiliation, or shared culture:
Her parents wanted her to marry within her race.
a human population partially isolated reproductively from other populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.
a group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic lineage:
the Slavic race.
any people united by common history, language, cultural traits, etc.:
the Dutch race.
the human race or family; humankind:
Nuclear weapons pose a threat to the race.
Zoology. a variety; subspecies.
I see that @Dinner is losing miserably, as he rightly should.
Racist lump of filth.
Bigot? Yeah, probably.
Look, @Dinner is only racist if you take his ideas, actions, and what he says while claiming not to be racist into account. He clearly says he is not a racist, and you clearly are not listening to his claim. If only you could see it from his point of view that you are being mean by pointing out his racist actions because you ignore he says he 's not a racist. And that is just name calling by logically determining racism by actions and ideas without regarding how that label might make him feel bad.
Yes, it is much better to be like chuppie and judge people by where they shop and how much money they have.
Not letting it go, are ya?
It's presumably an attempt to draw me out.
Must try harder.
Did I ever say I was? I understand chup is supposed to be ignoring me, and he is close to doing that, but I never made any boasts about ignoring the fucknugget,
Not really considering you have merely cut down a lot of your replying to me and you are not ignoring me as your post ratings show. You are doing good boy, but you are not ignoring me.
It's love, baby!
I didn't vote.
@Ramen, could you let Anna know whether and how you voted on her shitlord poll? She was conducting a witch-hunt, but alas -- incompetence prevented takeoff. And please keep any responses short and clear. Her don't read too good.
The term is thrown around very loosely these days. Before I vote....What statements has he made that warrants the charge? Exact quotes please.
Although, the two terms are reasonably synonymous.
His bigotry is racially, and by extension ethnically, based.
I mean, if you showed him five white dudes or five Filipinos, do you think he could spot the muslim?
The twist would be they were all Muslims.
See, that's the thing. @Dinner talks of his objection being just Muslims, but he's already ranted against Arabs, Indians, Persians and Somalis without knowing if they are Muslim or not. He's posted articles about migrants of which he has no actual knowledge of whether they are Muslim or not. He doesn't care. The whole "it's just Islam" nonsense is a red herring. If it were truly just about opposing the nature of a religious belief then he would agree with me on all my comments, which have always been that I think the religion is ridiculous but I respect the right of others to practice their religion peacefully. If he opposes that comment then he is clearly hiding a bigoted prejudice that goes well beyond what he claims. In fact, as he now what he disagrees with about my take and he'll either offer a deliberate straw man, or simply chicken out of respond.....isn't that right, @Dinner?
If a man can self identify as a woman or a woman self identify as a cat, we as an evolved society must accept that person as what they self identify as.
So if Dinner wants to self identify as a non racist, we here must accept that and move on. Us enlightened folks on WF should easily accept this. It's how the world works post Caitlyn Jenner.
Well, this thread was fun.
You have a strange definition of "fun".
Isn't it time for you to post personal info again?
I killed the thread with my ironclad logic.
I voted yes. Every single person possesses racial biases. To claim otherwise is disingenuous.
Racial bias is one thing. You won't find many Navy people who are overly fond of Filipinos, much less any who worked in supply. But none of them are calling for Filipinos to get banned out the service and call them welfare moochers for using the Navy to get outta their shithole country.
When people repeatedly and exicitly say their reason for migrating is because they want free welfare money I take them at their word. People like Anna believe accepting what they say at face value is some how "racist".
That just shows you how screwed up our SJW friends are.
Also you are confusing people with a job, I. E. in the Navy, with shit bags who not only do not have jobs but do not want them.
Fair enough. So then why is @Dinner supposedly racist? Sorry, but I don't know the backstory.
Separate names with a comma.