Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Dinner, Nov 14, 2019.
You're nuttier than a fucking fruit cake.
Yes, Dinner, I know it's a fantasy that you'll ever supply evidence of your bullshit claims.
Glad to see you admit it, but you're not giving me any information a newly verbal toddler couldn't have deduced.
Go suck a dick.
Isn’t that the leftist playbook, call someone you disagree with a racist and poof you’re a racist with no evidence?
It's your claim, why are you asking me?
Fuck me sideways.
You used the "n" word far more recent than 12 years ago, as has been shown to you repeatedly, which you continue to ignore. My examples didn't include the Chris Rock quote. Those are all Dinner originals.
Here's the list of racist comments you've made in the past 9 years, and most of them are from 3 years ago or sooner:
With these two containing the "n" word totally unrelated to a quote, and are by you, stated by no one else:
Now, where did I say anything about blood guilt? Come on, Dinner, show it now so this shit can be done.
Seems pretty self evident in the past few years on WF. It’s exactly what you guys do.
Also worth pointing out that race baiting is not synonymous with simply being racist.
As a mod, I would define race baiting as use race as a basis to troll or try and provoke a reaction.
The thing is, that's not even a comprehensive list. Those are just the go to ones you pull up with search, and not having to dig far.
Everyone, go neg those posts if you haven't.
That'll make some nice bookmarking for Dinner, and jog his memory.
Let's give him a helping hand.
Oh, and every fucking last one of those sounded like shit from my racist grandfather.
"How do you know he was racist?".
Because he fucking said so.
Isn't it interesting how the bullshit from a confessed racist, and one in denial sound exactly alike?
No, it must just be a Twilight Zone level coincidence.
Maybe someone flipped a coin, and it landed on its side.
The battle cry of someone coming up short in the real evidence department.
Besides @Dinner, why should Amaris have to do the groundwork to dig up posts? You've made it repeatedly clear that is too much hard work and what is more important is what you remember.
It’s self evident that all men are created equal, do you disagree with this?
I'm not playing a word game you learned on some Christian blog somewhere.
Cough up evidence of your claim, or take a flying fuck off a rolling donut.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal," is stated in the Declaration of Independence. Of course, this was stated at a time when black people were slaves, and women couldn't vote, so it really depended upon what one considered "men."
All of that said, hey @Dinner, where is your evidence?
An official definition is what's needed here. Many people have come to accept a twisted version of race baiting which basically means "talking about or perceiving racism in any way."
NOT ALL MEN
What's WF's take on homophobic baiting:
1. You're an idiot, and also a racist.
2. "Race baiting" really does need a solid definition. I recognize exactly who/what it's targeting and I don't really disapprove, but you guys had better do this "fairly" if you're going to do it.
Your link doesn't work.
Full disclosure here, the admins brought this up a few days ago with staff and the majority consensus seemed to be that no rules changes at all were needed to start laying down warnings on people behaving in that way.
The suggestion of a formal mention in the rules was the minority suggestion of those like myself who felt it was fairer to give people a heads up that trying to test the limits of the rules in that current area wasn't a good idea anymore.
However, a straight consensus from both staff and posters commenting on this addition up to now has been that the last thing anyone wants is tighter definitions of rules for people to try and rules lawyer around. WF has been there and tried that and it simply didn't work well.
Treat it like the no porno rule. It's one of those things you can't simply boil down to a list of banned words or phrases and intent does matter.
Edit: above all purely my interpretation of it all.
It’s a simple question @garamet
I asked mine first.
Mods, is mother’s basement shut-in a race?
Asking for a friend.
Just for @Dinner and @oldfella1962 race baiting is not calling someone out for injecting racism into a discussion. I know it makes you both really sad when someone uses a perfectly valid description regarding your racism, but using the words "race baiting" to try and give a negative impression of whoever calls out your racist comments in a piss poor attempt to shame them into silence regarding your open prejudice is going to fail.
If you want people to eventually stop calling you two racists you might want to stop being racist. Not to mention sexist, homophobic, white supremacist, and overly dishonest in your conversations. Just sayin.
If "go suck a dick" is homophobic, then "go fuck yourself" is discriminatory against people who masturbate.
Separate names with a comma.