Fortunately, that treasonous woman is not in charge of that decision. She can take her "we will keep rerunning the election until I get the results I want" ass and piss off.
I get that, but Obama's "restriction" was just taking away an exemption from following the rules. That's a lot more innocuous than an outright ban based on religion and/or geography. Yeah we'll see. I didn't say it was illegal. As people keep saying...we have the right to keep any non-citizen out of this country for any dumb reason we want.
Perhaps they will write us a sternly worded letter telling us how disappointed they are? In the mean time we have already taken far more of the animals than Ireland (unfortunately) and I am certain that after the review we will take far more Christians. We just prefer not to take the animals who cause terror and destruction every where large numbers of them go.
The irony of this sentence would be delicious, were it not for the taste of stupid shaken on like ketchup on lobster.
After yesterday's Muslim terrorist attack in Canada you have the balls to say something as stupid as that?
I agree with Dinner in principle on many of these issues but I wish he would not call the Muslims "animals". Disgusting and monstrous human beings some of them are but not "animals" (aside from humans in general being "animals")
Yep, just like the last mosque shooting that left forge rushed to blame on white conservatives only to find out it was a disgruntled member on a shooting spree. Now, we know one of the three shooters from yesterday was from Morocco and that all three where shouting Allah Akbar as they gunned people down but we don't know any more details. Authorities have been extremely slow in releasing details so Reddit and other online sources published eye witness accounts and slowly authorities have had to fess up. We do know the Canadian PM called it a terrorist attack. Rather ironic that one the same day the PM opened his big mouth about how wonderful mass Muslim immigration supposedly is there is yet another Muslim terrorist attack.
I refer to all muslims as animals because that is what their collective actions earn them. As a group they are indeed highly problematic, barbaric, and not at all desirable. Now, as Churchill said individual muslims can exhibit many admirable traits but as a group there are none worse. The man knew what he was talking about.
No group as large and diverse as the Islamic faith deserves to be slammed with a degrading and dehumanizing term. We're talking about a billion people here, not the Manson family. And Winston Churchill was a great man. A hero. I'll take second place to no one in my admiration of him. But he was still just a man. Flawed as anyone.
That is true but I consider myself in good company with this estimation. In deference to your sensitivities I will find other ways to express my opinion of this undesirable group.
So...the one whose view you respect sufficiently to persuade you to tone down the obnoxiousness of your racism...is fucking @Dayton3!!!!
"It has nothing to do with race but I will pretend it is because I cannot argue facts!" Any other standard English words you want to misuse?
Let me know when they are responsible for around 90% of global terrorist attacks or the vast majority support killing people because they convert. Until then your comparison has no merit.
Meh, you missed gypsies. Nobody likes having them around and practically nobody (except perhaps the kneejerk "fascist"-screamers) cares if you disparage them en masse.
Blaming Obama? I'm not blaming Obama you stupid turd. I'm pointing out that even Obama and his team choose these specific countries because they presented special difficulties. Trump did not choose these countries for shits and giggles to just rile up retarded people like you. He choose them because he agrees with Obama and his team that these countries present special difficulties. So claiming it was done due to racism or religion or business is just stupid. You actually hurt your cause by lying because all Trump and his people have to do is point out that they are continuing to deal with the same seven countries that Obama and his team felt required special handling. If it's good enough for Obama then why is it not good enough for Trump?
The problem with that is Trump dogged everything Obama did. Per the Donald, he was supposed to be better and make changes to 'make America great again'. To fall back on 'this is Obama's list' is weak. Now Trump is following Obama lead? And because the EO is not panning out so well....its Obama's list. Oh yeah...and it is blaming Obama.
Of course he dogged everything Obama did. Obama dogged Bush throughout the whole 2008 campaign. But there were things that Obama still did that Bush and his team were working on. Bush dogged Clinton in 2000. Clinton dogged Bush in 1992. And on and on. It's called politics. The people who also ran for POTUS in the primaries and the general election but didn't win also dogged everything that everyone else did. Look what Hillary was doing to Obama in 2008. Hell she was dogging him without naming him in 2016. She couldn't name him because it would have looked really bad but she was doing it. Look at how the Republicans dogged each other during the primaries. To say that because Trump was dogging Obama during the campaign therefore he must ignore everything that happened from 2008 to 2016 is just stupid. whatthefuckiswrongwithyou?
None of those guys created a shitstorm trying to dismantle things the former President put in place when they got in office.
So? It still doesn't make your statement about dogging any more true. Politicians dog each other all the time when they are running for office.
Ah, another cross-Atlantic usage of the word we Brits can fill alongside Fanny in the amusing category.
The biggest group of illegal aliens in this country are insects, what's Trump going to do about that?