As if we weren't already the laughing stock of the Nation...

You keep making me like Ken Ham more.

Moore had never admitted to being a pedophile or anything that could be considered pedophilia.

He denied having sex with teenagers, but he stated that he may have gone on dates with teenagers during his 30s. What would you call a 30 year old dating a teenager?

Creepy and disgusting. But is that against the law in Alabama?

What you're suggesting is the equivalent of calling someone who shoots someone a "murderer" when the victim didn't die.

I'm not saying that he necessarily broke any law. A pedophile is a pedophile, regardless of the backwards laws Alabama has. The common definition is that sexual attraction to teenagers and children is pedophilia. He admitted to dating teenagers. Are you really going to equivocate that a pedophile is suddenly not a pedophile when he sets foot in Alabama?

It is if they are 14 or 15. We have many witnesses who say just that.

To be a pedophile I think you have to be guilty of a crime. Same as rape, murder, theft........

But no actual evidence.

8 accusers and around 60 cooperating witnesses is proof, genius.

Need I remind you that in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus says that looking at a woman, who is not your wife, with lust in your eyes is the same as committing adultery?

That's 100% false. You're thinking of the crime of statutory rape, which of course one has to be convicted for. But, someone can be sexually attracted to children/teenagers and not ever act on that attraction (or be convicted), but still be a pedophile. It's a psychological term: https://www.psychologytoday.com/conditions/pedophilia

He admitted to dating at least two teenagers.

Which though repugnant is not against the law.

I believe that.

Do you?

and no matter what I believe adultery is not a crime anymore. I thought you were against Christians trying to impose their morality on everyone else?

Do I believe what? That looking at another person and finding them attractive is adultery? No. Do I believe Jesus said it? No. Do I believe that Jesus existed? No.

Pedophilia isn't a crime, molesting children is. One doesn't need to molest children to be a pedophile. Do you not say that it is perfectly acceptable for people to be gay, so long as they do not commit homosexual acts? Same thing.

Okay. Point taken.

What does it say in the yearbook?

That's hardly evidence of a sexual relationship.

Very few abortions involve pregnancies caused by rape or incest.

And it isn't the 1950s anymore. Obtaining birth control is pretty easy.

How is the yearbook message evidence of "attempted rape"?

And that segues to "attempted rape"?

To the dismay of the GOP.

Except those who are die hard Catholics I don't know of many who are anti birth control

Why is this a controversial idea? Isn't that the fundamental principle of liberty?

Dayton's obviously unfamiliar with the concept of reality at this point.