That totally fixes him passing along the fake litterbox conspiracy!! I love Rogan now!! You're a hero, FF!! A hero!!!!!!!!! HERO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Is that what you thought was gonna happen? It is, isn't it?
I don’t give a shit what you think. You’re a closed minded libtard. You reek of pure smugness and think you’re the smartest person in the room. You know useless facts, that’s it and the retards here applaud you for it because it’s a fucking hive mind, Life of Brian style. You don’t see this because you live in a bubble, but it’s clear to people who seek out several different perspectives on life, like I do. Fuck off, turd.
You once again prove that you don’t understand what words mean. There was no litter box conspiracy and Joe Rogan is not my hero.
Oh, and.... Yes, conservatives who hate liberals, and ex-liberals who hate liberals, and Tankies who hate liberals; find FF a flavor of human who hates liberals, and you're in his rainbow of diversity.
You check out any of those right, center right, centrist or center left podcasts I recommended to you last time you stated you wanted diverse perspectives? Which ones? What’d you think?
Uh huh, Jon Stewart who’s been a liberal all his life, Jimmy Dore who was a staunch Bernie Sanders supporter, Joe Rogan who endorsed Bernie Sanders, Krystal Ball who supported Bernie Sanders, Etc, etc. No they just don’t live in your little bubble and they don’t spit DNC propaganda and talking points so you don’t like them.
No I didn’t because I don’t believe you when you claim they are right of center. You’re a hard core leftist so your idea of centrist is probably AOC.
Aren't you the one who says we're pussies if we don't want to watch your Nazi Youtubers? Guess that shit only flows one way, huh? A conservative being a hypocrite, must be a day ending in y.
Assume that is true. That a bunch of former and current Republicans are far left. I thought you JUST SAID that you sought out several different perspectives?
So you're a seeker of alternate perspectives and do your own research, but you didn't bother to listen to any perspective you thought was left of center, or even bother to fucking CHECK if they were, just went with your hunch because you don't trust Anc. That academic rigor is mortis.
I'll give you that one. And then flipped to Trump. And said Trump would be better for progressives. How'd that go? Until he flipped to Trump. Never heard of her.
So conservatives weren't repeating lies about litter boxes in schools to manufacture some outrage and encourage their base to vote? And Rogan didn't repeat those lies without verifying them first, only to backtrack after a month? We all know that as a libertarian you reserve the right to only comment on the topics you consider most important, and you spend a lot of time defending Rogan. Certainly suggests he's important to you.
What a sad little man you are. Once again, you showed up thinking that you’d “own” us, only for you to get your ass handed to you. Why? Because we understand you better than you do us. And until you do something to reverse that, you’re going to keep getting your ass handed to you.
No you don't know me. You think you do, but you don't. You think Rogan is a science denier, but he isn't because if he was, why would he have Neil Degrasse Tyson on? Furthermore, why would Tyson go on Rogan's podcast? No, the reason liberals like you attack Joe Rogan is because he has guests on that challenge the narratives and he's more popular than the mainstream media. That's why you don't like him.
Now I know you plugged your ears and hummed, not once, but twice now, for my post about how Rogan was (might still be?) a fucking moon landing denier, and argued about it with the guy from Bad Astronomy.
Your cries of being a centrist fall apart when the political one drop rule you use to label things you don't like as communist are an entirely different standard to the rule that if they aren't goose stepping all the time there's no problem you use for those on the right.
Possible reasons why a science denier might have someone like Neil Degrasse Tyson on a podcast 1. The science denier denies science (climate change, vaccines etc.) different from that NDT focuses on (note- I know little to nothing about Joe Rogan so I don't know if he denies science at all, or specifically these areas, but I think that he has done both). 2. NDT=ratings/clicks/views/whatever and the science denier values them more than denying science. 3. The science denier wants to put up a facade of not being a science denier. Possible reasons why NDT might go on a science denier's podcast 1. He likes the challenge of potentially debating a science denier 2. He is unaware of the podcaster being a science denier 3. He has something to promote and it is worth putting up with the science denier 4. There is an agreement to talk about the areas of science where the science denier is at least somewhat reasonable.