Ageism tangent from Ted Cruz is a piece of shit thread

@shootER, any chance of separating the ageism tangent into another thread?

 

Oh just scroll past it, you whine tit. Fuck's sake.

 

Wine tit sounds good. Reminds me of the korova milk bar.

 

"Nuh uh, YOU are teh whine! "

 

The alternative, to whinge, disturbs me more.

 

The ironic thing is that age discrimination only applies if someone is at least 40. So a company can't refuse to hire someone just because they're 65. And yet they can refuse to hire Federal Farmer because he's a teenager.

 

If you never want to worry about ageism get into financial services. God knows how many “consultants” I’ve seen hired over the years who were in their mid 60s and older. At that point you’re just getting warmed up. Here comes Johnny with his 43 year resume, he’ll tell you everything you’re doing wrong.

 

So this entire tangent was because @Federal Farmer felt the need to come to the defense of TED FREAKING CRUZ?!?!?



Is there any R scum sucker the boy doesn’t want to fellate?

 

Nah, since I don't have to worry about him tweeting out something that might get us into a war, I'm not particularly hyper-focused on his actions. Just like I didn't complain about the number of hours each day Trump spent in "executive time." At least when he was watching TV or golfing, he wasn't fucking shit up.

'Member that scene in The Undiscovered Country where the Federation President drones on and on and McCoy says, "I'd pay real money to shut that man up?" This is basically what you'd see if the camera had panned over to the assembled members while he was speaking. Also, given that the event was held in Glasgow, Biden was probably jetlagged.

Bullshit press event with an Israeli politician. Was Biden bored? Was he sleeping? Was he praying? Was he trying to carefully shape his thoughts so that when he spoke he didn't stutter? I don't know.

I'll ignore the fact that the audio's been altered, and that means there's a chance that the video of Biden's also been altered, and just point out that Hillary's speaking, and say that I doubt you'd be able to stay awake if she spoke to you (not a dis, but that's another story). Also note that the lower third labels him as "Vice President." So it happened before the 2020 election. Was he on the campaign trail in 2020? Or was it shot in 2016? I don't know. Don't particularly care. He might have been tired out from campaigning, or he just might not like Hillary. If it's the latter, are you going to argue with him on that?
I notice that the person at the mike also has their eyes closed, and that nobody in that thread linked to video of the event. Is it possible that this was during a prayer? Or that both Biden and the speaker blinked at roughly the same time?

And? Billy Graham once said the following to then-President Nixon:

A guy who routinely spoke to the President of the United States said that he had "no power." Holy shitballs, Batman! If you can routinely have meetings with POTUS then you have power. Period. Paragraph.

Trump also called Putin "savvy" and a "genius" when asked about what's happening in Ukraine. You going to agree with Trump? Or are you going to say that perhaps Trump isn't a good judge of character?

 

That was Chang rambling Shakespeare lines.

 

Notice how often rubes fall for videos like that, like they're curated for their ignorance and prejudices?

I do.

 

And they're all correct.

 

In fairness, Matlock is pretty awesome.

 

Why isn't a five-year-old qualified to drive a truck?

 

that's most definitely not what she said.
And hey, my over 50 ass is out there supporting young'uns who've not only taken up the torches I once carried, but are burning them brighter.

Maybe you could endeavour to learn the concept of "projection" and clear up that athlete's foot around your lips?

 

that's adorable that you think such a thing ever existed...

 

It would if I were hiring people.

 

that's the easy part-absorb people with basic qualifications into an employment pool.

now that you have this staff, can you define the "objective merit" to promote one to a position of leadership?

 

Yes.

 

...

 

Asked and answered.

Not offering a detailed situational laundry list for you to shoot holes in, but I will tell you what would not enter into consideration: anyone's inherent traits. Same criteria apply regardless of your particulars, and you either satisfy them or hit the bricks.

 

okay, so "inherent traits".

like ability to deal with group work, or that they suck up well?

I just don't believe there's such a thing as "meritocracy", let alone if it'd be the ideal method if definable. It's inevitably corrupted the moment humans are involved.

 

Don't give me that look. Answer the question.

 

I'm not being cute or cheeky. Why can't a five-year-old drive a truck, assuming they can pass all the required tests?

And don't say they can't reach the pedals or see over the dash, because that argument quickly falls apart when you talk about little people.

 

The proper term I think is midgets.

 

No. That can be learned.

Entitled people never do. They would rather whine about privilege than be accountable for developing themselves into something useful.

 

As evidenced by The Temple of Doom.