http://rawstory.com/2009/12/rove-mocked-divorced/ Fitting, the ultimate back-room political hack who specialized in polarizing and fracturing the American public to score election points, who used banning gay marriage as a vehicle for his agenda, can't take care of his own marriage. Rove and Newt Gingrich should run together on a family values ticket.
Amazing. Another bunch of vicious anti-Christians pretending they know what Christianity means. Please explain to me how being opposed to gay marriage means that you're opposed to divorce?
^Only if you first explain why I should listen to a bunch of fat guys working on their third or fourth marriage telling me how marriage should or shouldn't be. That's like listening to a carpenter with only 4 fingers tell you how to safely operate a bandsaw.
Trying and failing at something doesn't mean you don't have a right to an opinion. Heck. Trying, failing, and trying again usually means you've got a better perspective on it than most everyone else. But that wasn't what I was talking about in my first post here. I was wondering why people felt Rove's views on gay marriage mean that he's a hypocrite because he's getting a divorce.
No, the proper analogy would be your four fingered carpenter telling you how to conduct emergency surgery on a patient.
Well, no homosexual has never actually been married. If some want to enable their delusion that's their business. But it has little to do with Christians getting divorced.
Now he can bang Jeff Gannon, that porn star queer, that Rove let in the White House Press room back in 2004.
Are you being intentionally dense? The common rallying call against homosexual marriage is usually that it is a threat to traditional marriage. How is divorce (the ending of a marriage) not a threat to a marriage?
Really? Sources? Barring that, Being against something and claiming it's not a marriage at all (one of the arguments against homosexual marriage) really doesn't have that much to do with beginning and ending something one claims is a legitimate marriage. And, again with my points from other threads, I don't really care whether gays choose to join themselves in civil union or call that whatever they want. A real, religious marriage is properly done in a church of some sort without any restriction by the government. The spiritual aspects and legal aspects are separate issues and the government has no more business regulating the spiritual aspects of that than they do telling the Boy Scouts whether they should be forced to accept gay Scoutmasters, for instance. I'm a Christian and my marriage isn't threatened by what someone else does and chooses to call marriage. I can and will disagree if some people choose to call what they have a "Christian" marriage but, as I've also said in other threads, I'm not the ultimate judge of someone else's spiritual state.
When you start preaching against "traditional values", you really should publish some sort of universally accepted canon of your beliefs so everyone knows exactly what you're talking about...
How about from the bible (old testament), which bans homosexuality, but allows for and sanctions divorce.
Can anyone provide any evidence that Karl Rove himself made efforts at promoting "traditional values" or "opposed divorce"?