... In which a reporter admits that she was told by her boss to find a story that fit the desired conclusion, and an editor decides the facts just aren't newsworthy. http://www.healthinsurance.org/blog/2014/01/03/anatomy-of-an-obamacare-horror-story/
So, which will happen first? Face, Castle, or some other random idiot posts "TLDR" or Ancalagon about "Too many Obamacare thredz!!!111!" Captain X posts "garamet is trolling, therefore I'm not posting in this thread!"
"There were just a lot of gaps in her story," says reporter who decided to start fact-checking other reporters: http://bit.ly/1lvy2JQ
^Why am I not surprised? When you click through the link at the bottom of your article, you find this:
I have yet to see a single right wing claim about the ACA to be anything but a lie. Literally EVERY one of these supposed cases are completely made up lies and not a single one so far has actually held up to outside scrutiny. They're just tea baggers and right wing nuts lying. You know if any of these were actually true then these political partisans would gladly share their details but when they refuse to provide verification and won't even provide even the basic details to reporters who call to fact check, well, its obvious they know they're telling porky pies.
Wow. I thought the Kartoon Kommandoes would at least jump on that 3%. Guess we can accept their surrender.
...in other news, there are something upwards of 22,000 bugs reported by users that are just going into a big virtual bin labeled "to do".
Shouldn't that have followed Volpone's post? garamet knows website =/= ACA. Lanzman apparently still doesn't.
But thanks for the placeholder. Debunking Obamacare sob story That horror story of the Obamacare fail for the Federal Way mom isn’t the horror it was made out to be. They usually aren’t.
Actually, the predictability was one where you were the target coming in right on tafkat's heels you did not disapoint.