Why do people think that I like war?

I have noticed that some of you think that I glory in war and like war.

Just because I have never been to war and have no intention of doing so under any circumstances doesn't mean that I don't get to have an opinion.

After all, advocacy for war in no way implies admiration for it.

If we lose a small number of troops (say 100,000) in a campaign but defend our nations interests, then what exactly is the problem? And who cares about how many lesser people that are done away with?

I think that I am owed an apology. Or maybe I will have to delete the board. Your choice.

All for now.

If you guys are going to be fair he made a threat to the intellectual property that is the board and thus should be banned for one week as I was.

Only one of you is a parody account...

Dayton, you've argued that the threat was bogus. Now here you come, and make it again, then immediately follow with a post demanding a banning. I'll admit that I'm a bit confused by your thought process, but if you think you need a week off, we can certainly arrange that.

I've already been banned and returned genius.

I don't care if my threat was bogus or not. You banned me either way. Now ban this European member who has this stupid parody account for saying effectively the same thing.

Of course, if you are a hypocrite.....

FTFY

Watching Dayton vs his doppleganger is like watching the Evil Robot Bill & Ted vs Good Robot Bill & Ted.
(Hint: NotDayton is the good Dayton made of hardware store junk)

I know, and now you've made the threat and probably ought to be banned again. But I am curious why you are arguing for and against a ban in the same thread.

Once again, for the board member that never saw the inside of a regular sized school bus until recently. You do not own the board, you do not make policies on this board, you have zero control of how anything is handled on this board other than the posts you choose to make.

And your very disregard for how actions are handled on this board speak volumes as to why you are so often ridiculed and put upon.

Are you actually saying that you can threaten the board without repercussion? Because if so, then it sounds like you are once again threatening the operation of this board. I'm not staff, nor do I own any part of the board, but I do suggest that you tread very carefully with those type of posts.

And the threat you are claiming that was made by a European member said,

That statement is very vague and general, it does not specify any board in any way. It is different as you threatened this board, and you further claimed that you own the material on this board. Were intending to commit identity theft as well?

I did not make a threat. I pointed out the notDayton parody account did.

hypocritical bast**d (you gul)

Why has @Dayton3 taken to using foul language? And why does he think that starring out a word makes any difference?

He called someone "fuckface" in the other thread too.

I thought you never resorted to name calling until you were called a name. Who's the hypocrite now?

I think those were NotDayton posts.

As if Jesus is tricked by that.
I love that, God botherers who think there are tricks and loopholes.

I suppose I get annoyed at someone (notDayton) even a parody account suggesting that I would be for killing 50,000 civilians for no good reason whatsoever.

Why would you want to do that? That's incredibly immoral and disgusting, why would you even joke about that? And how does calling someone a name equate to wanting them to die, first you call @gul a name, now you want 50,000 people to die because @gul is telling you that more threats against the board will result in further bans? Have you considered getting professional help?

NotDayton didn't threaten the board, per se.
He parodied your threats to the board, as part of his parody of you.
That's not hypocrisy, but accuracy.

....one day Ed....

One day what? You're going to kill 50,000 in the name of Wordforge? Gul? Me? Get professional help? You are being extremely vague here.

You're a smart boy Ed. You figure it out.

I understand what Dayton's saying, for the record. The use of bannings for the "threaten the board" clause has gotten out of hand. Seriously.

For instance, I intend, specifically, to turn this board into a photostream of pink unicorns and anthropomorphic lizards. Have at it, eliteforge. At least I know I'll have @John on my side for this one.

I just did, you're secretly gay and have decided to come out of the closet. That does explain a lot, such as why do not like working with females, having them as friends, etc..

To the individual whose dual is @NotDayton (yes, I know who you really are)

I cracked up at "say, 100,000."

@Dayton3 is probably upset that @NotDayton is more well regarded than Dayton himself is.

Dayton has 50.13% positive rep to posts, NotDayton has a 356.52% positive rep to posts. By any reasonable standard NotDayton is much more well regarded than Dayton.

Finally!

cliffs notes?

Thy were tossed over the cliff.

After the original version of rep was changed, Dayton reverted to the asshole you see today. Another member created the NotDayton account to mock how completely ridiculous original Dayton is. It's the best dual/troll account I've seen in my online history, and getting the owner tripped up in post number three, among many others, shows how well he can copy Dayton's stupidity, right down to the broken quote tags he claims he can't fix after 20 years online.

It's all part of him remaking his image for his upcoming Presidential run. You know, to make him seem hipper and edgier, like when Mitt Romney announced he was wearing skinny jeans.