I always assumed it was Faceman, but nobody here would have anyway of knowing unless they happen to operate the account or are in the confidence of the operator. You do understand that Twitter has nothing to do with Wordforge, yes?
I think it's funny that he thought I was the one that created it, and I've stated several times that I didn't.
Why would you feel any need to look up any information on him, at all? I don't like him either, but I wouldn't want to go all internet stalker on him. You don't seem to share that viewpoint. Tell me - how do you feel about doxxing?
No, I'm saying that the act of posting that thread could cause no additional damage beyond that which you have caused yourself, and I knew that when I posted it. Now, about that thread that indicates that likely you knew full well who squiggy was and where he worked...going to avoud addressing that one now are we yellow boy?
What is doxxing? If the top Google result is a definition then it doesn't apply to me. I have never posted anything on here that Dayton has not posted himself or not given permission to post. Dayton would be well within his rights to ask for my banning if he did. I looked up his information based on what he posted here out of pure curiosity. Took me about five minutes. I have never shared the additional information I found that hasn't been shared or authorised by Dayton himself. His name, profession, location, names of his wife, mother, the investigation into his job....all either openly posted by Dayton outside of the Blue Room or with his permission (and the school investigation papers were disclosed in a conversation with someone else, not me). Sorry, you can try and catch me out but you won't. Dayton is entirely responsible for what people here know about him and is equally responsible for the low opinion he has created in others. I'm not carrying the can for either of those.
I didn't say it did, I simply asked you how you felt about it. I find it kind of disturbing that you would have such curiosity.
Malicious use of undisclosed personal information against a person's will (assuming that's what it means) is clearly not what is happening here. If someone here engages in a sustained campaign of undisclosed personal information revelation then I would expect said person to be quickly banned. What is disturbing about spending five minutes of time to look up someone up? Someone I've talked to almost day to day with on and off for years? If I'd spent hours trying to acquire every last bit of personal info, delving into every element of his life I could, then fair enough, that would be disturbing. But I don't recall you pulling up Tamar for doing that to just about everyone here while she was a mod. You were curiously silent then. But really, a five minute Google. Are we really pretend that pretty much everyone here hasn't done that? That's just bull.
I do not hijack threads about other topics. This thread had potential, so I'd suggest that mods move your and his posts out of it to one of the other two or three active Dayton threads at the moment. You're becoming obsessed.
And yet if you actually bothered to read the thread you'd see it was Dayton who decided to come in here throwing personal attacks around. Yet somehow this is my fault....
You mean, the way you have in your hospital bomb thread, including with Dayton himself and tards like gturner? Please, the hypocrisy stinks. If you want to post about the original thread topic then nobody is stopping you there are plenty of posts on that topic in the thread to reply to, including some of my own.
No, not like that, since that's on topic. And no, I'm not getting involved in a three-page back and forth with you as well because you can't take the smallest criticism, so I'm out of here. You have a real fucking chip on your shoulder. Sort yourself the fuck out.
Rick's right, though, this thread did have potential. I was hoping this topic at least didn't have to become about Dayton
I think this was the last on topic post before the Chup and Dayton show took over: Definitely total bullshit. Teenagers should be giving and receiving blowjobs and sending naked pics to each other. It's kind of how they are wired. On your other post, about NAMBLA, yes I've heard of them, but they aren't exactly taken seriously. What I meant was that when there is a credible movement to legalize or otherwise make acceptable the idea of acting on pedophilia, then I'm going to get involved in shutting those fuckers down. But I think the idea of acknowledging urges gives us more space to help people not to act on them, which in the end will do more to protect children that ostacization.
I had started a thread on such a study a while back on pedophiles that don't act on their urges. The main one interviewed for the article mentioned that he noticed these feelings at the onset of puberty. He'd never been molested himself* and had an otherwise normal upbringing but thought that children were enjoying these acts till he saw a particularly horrendous video involving an infant and said no more. * as an aside, this statistic of "most have been molesters themselves" is one that we get from studying those who have already been convicted and are in prison...in other words, those who have a reason to lie. Just a food for thought. ETA: My original thread, with the article hyperlinked in the OP: http://wordforge.net/index.php?thre...xt-biggest-mental-illness-battlefield.106686/
Nope, no problem there. Let the Muzzies and the rest of the kiddie-fiddlers fiddle them kiddies? Who are we to judge with our western morality and yarf yarf yarf, et cetera.
I guess the best answer would be none. There were a number of girls I had some interest in in high school but I never actually "dated" any of them.
That's attraction, not sexuality. You never masturbated? Looked at dirty magazines? Fantasised about those girls with their clothes off? You, the normal pubescent awakenings that teenage lads go through?
Sure, I did all those usual things. Though IIRC the pornographic material was all but impossible to obtain where I lived.
The mods gave him a warning and told him to cut it out, he did for a day or two, but then went right back to his old habits. This the ban. He got fair warning first a friendly one in a thread, then an official one by PM, but he just kept breaking the rules.
How can you doxx someone who already put his name and all other personal information out there on the record?
No porno mags? Bloody hell, no wonder you''ve become so frustrated as an adult! My sympathies. Btw, how the hell did you manage to quote my post three times?
