The most amazing thing about that list of unsourced and badly edited allegations is how it proudly demonstrates that the accusers consider "sex and sexual assault" to be one category. A woman's consent just doesn't appear in their thoughts.
Of the four smartphones I've owned, the Note 2 was the best as correcting the words and learning the ones I'd use (particularly Trek-centric named like T'Pol that the Note 4 continued to self correct as T'Police). This S7 changed the word "things" to "opportunity" yesterday
Are you talking about autocorrect on the keyboard or for handwriting? If it's the former, it's a function of the keyboard app, not connected to the phone (and I strongly recommend using SwiftKey as your keyboard).
Seriously, give SwiftKey a try -- it's just an app, installs like any other app, and you'll love it. If I can't convince you, look at how @Raymen repped my first post on the subject -- just trust that he is wrong!
That's because the "thing" is looking for an "opportunity" to blow up and at least has the courtesy to warn you.
He's also completely wrong about bimbo eruptions, which was not a project or strategy but a description for Paula Jones' claims.
Hmmm......I just thought about this: from the left/Democrat point of view, all of the women accusing Bill Clinton of sexual harassment/assault are "bimbos". But all of the women accusing Donald Trump of the same (or much less actually) are "victims". Don't ever change, left!
Um, no. Is Bill Clinton's name on the ballot? Has he ever suggested that assault is okay if you can get away with it? Sorry, false equivalence.
No, Bill Clinton is not on the ballot - very astute observation! True, he never actually came right out and said "sexual assault is okay if you can get away with it" because he was too busy actually committing adultery and then lying about it under oath. This we can prove, assault not so much. Donald joked about it but there is not enough proof that he acted upon his claims nor will there ever be. You got me - false equivalence no doubt.
One thing someone brought up on FB is the fact that our culture has shifted considerably on the subject of rape in the last 20 years. People on both sides of the aisle were quick to dismiss victims outright if a celebrity was involved on the basis of "why would he rape when he can get any woman he wants?" If Bill Clinton were running today, I'd like to think we wouldn't be so quick to dismiss such claims outright. I imagine if this had happened to Trump 20 years ago, no one would give a thought to this.
Guy claims to have done something during what he thought was a private conversation. Then almost a dozen women publicly accuse him of doing exactly what he claims to do. But no, there's nothing to suggest he actually did the thing.