I don't blame you for sputtering ad hominem fallacies. You've never been able to articulate an argument before, and there's certainly no good argument you could make here in the presence of damning evidence. Wikileaks boasts 100% accuracy, 100% primary sources and they're dismantling the crooked establishment.
I wouldn't have thought it possible, but then I went and followed the link, and, sure enough, M. Bison's more of an idiot than I'd previously realized.
Does it? I seriously don't know. How are they able to 100% verify everything as accurate, what's the process there?
I have to concur that after reading the link I too was shocked my opinion of m Gibson's intelligence was not at the lowest point possible. I would normally wonder how someone that stupid could tie their shoes, but I have to wonder if he could use Velcro properly.
Wikileaks receives private docs from anonymous sources. Assange's reputation for vetting is something of an anomaly. So far he's had 100% accuracy and gone unchallenged by state intelligence agencies, news outlets and publishers, even the White House. If he discussed his process openly, he would risk operatives' lives. If he vetted poorly or published false documents, news outlets and government agencies would love to destroy his professional reputation as they have his personal reputation. Wikileaks publishes private documents, but they're not responsible for the claims made within. We don't know that Clinton actually killed Foster. We only know that Stratfor Intelligence agents discussed it privately.
There is no point in arguing with somebody so stupid that he thinks an e-mail between two unrelated third parties speculating about a news event is evidence regarding Clinton involvement in said event. Your stupidity is an observable fact, not an ad hominem. You should try to work on your critical reasoning skills. Sometimes people can improve.
Did you know that M. Bison bottoms for rabid wolverines? He's well earned the nickname "Weasel buggeree." It must be true. I just read someone discussing it on the internet.
Not even speculating -- it reads more like a joke. This is like finding an email that says "I thought Obama was supposed to have rounded us all up into FEMA re-education camps by now" and taking it for evidence that such a plan actually existed. The Rabid Right's Clinton Derangement Syndrome is making even their ODS look like small potatoes.
Dunmbass, that doesn't even make sense given the thread title. Also, the speculation in the e-mail regards Ron Brown. Pay attention, man! Hell, you can't even follow your own supposed point.
