I don’t think there would be exemptions. Either a full ban or allow the states to decide, which will end in a lot of dead pregnant people. But that’s the goal of this, misery.
If it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways of shutting that down. I know this because a man told me it. Doesn't matter if he's a doctor or not, he knows things. /sarcasm
Definitely not. They're just too stupid to realize that's what they're doing, and too spiteful to listen to other people when they're told that's what they're doing. They want to stop thinking about it before it gets there. They'll *say* it's about preventing murder. They'll *think* it's about controlling women's sexuality. They'll stop thinking before they get to the immediate implication, which is that it will kill women.
It opens up a legal hole that a prosecutor might charge a woman and any accomplices with whatever penalty it is for the crime because they conspired to do it. It is hard to prove conspiring to buy or possess drugs in another state. However, with an abortion you might have appointments and other evidence that your trip was for the purpose of committing a crime. There may be all sorts of stupid legal loopholes which are opened by the combination of such laws if they are poorly written. Given the aggressive and open way anti-abortion laws tend to be written and enforced by the crazies I would not put it by them to have purposefully or accidentally opened up some problems like that. Some of these same people in their quest to impose religious laws from Christianity opened up loopholes with RFRAs that could have allowed racism, discrimination, and even possibly things like human sacrifice and slavery with how loosely they tried to allow for religious practices that violated laws.
Some probably do. If you truly think abortion is murder, a woman dying of a botched abortion could be seen like a serial killer getting stabbed in the prison laundry room. Hmm, no, I take back the "probably". Given the vengeance based thinking of all other facets of Christian moral ethics, there's no question many anti-abortionists think this way.
No, most just don't care. They don't care about human life at all. Some very likely do though, probably consider it punishment for being whores or some other backwards ass belief.
It says so much that many of the people who support laws like this are the same fuckers who fight to make sex education and contraception less widespread.
maybe they dont but they sure as fuck dont give a fuck she shoulda closed her legs then maybe i wouldnt have come in her stone the whore for wanting to abort
@Dayton3 dont worry about answering you already have and your answers pretty interesting all things considered @TheLonelySquire @The Flashlight when you fuck your lowly common house whores seriously what did they do to deserve that fate and title do you use condoms at all or is it all their responsibility to not get knocked up and if so are they allowed to use birth control
I'm not defending the bill. I just think making shit up in order to try to make it look worse is self defeating.
Speculation on my part. It's just too calculated. The whole point of the law is to go to the Supreme Court. That's why they stripped out the amendment that provided for exemptions for rape/incest. That and people like Pat Robertson coming out and saying it's too regressive suggests to me that once/if the law does what it was specifically crafted for (overturning Roe v Wade) they plan to revisit it. I could be wrong.
Leaving it up to the states doesn't fly because of the 14th amendment. All of these draconian laws are discrimination against women because of their sex and it violates their right to privacy. As I said before there is a huge gulf between the doctors and nurses providing women's health care and the clowns supporting these draconian laws. We can see the effects of inadequate sex ed in the state legislatures of Georgia, Alabama, et al. Prosecuting doctors will function like a modern day Scopes Monkey Trial. On one side you have intelligence and the other side you have ignorance/cowardice borne out of religion.
This is a ridiculous argument. How does opposing elective abortions serve to control women's sexuality?
Someone needs to point out to Trump that the women least likely to be able to "abortion shop" due to lack of cash/access to transport are going to be immigrants. Watch him U-turn like fuck.
Here's some interesting fallout. As mentioned in the past, I count a few "cam-girls" among my friends list. It seems they can choose who or where to block from viewing their live streams and galleries. Georgia and Alabama will no longer have access... more states to follow, I'm sure.
As @Nova pointed out here or in another thread, pregnant people are already being arrested and investigated for miscarriages. It's not a stretch to believe this is gonna happen in Georgia too, even if the bill didn't explicitly spell it out, because BizarroEnt is right: if abortion is murder, then its murder whether done in Georgia or in a state that still believes in bodily autonomy.
Actually an abortion is never medically necessary for any reason, including saving the life of a mother. I used to think that it was but I've since learned that there is a distinct difference between an actual abortion (the intentional destruction and removal of an unborn child) and a medical procedure to save the life of the mother. Not every medical procedure in this case will always cause the end of a pregnancy. Not all birth control is a problem.
What scam artist told you that? That's just delusional thinking. But please explain to us what you think is right. Go on.
so the wordforge "administrator" can do nothing better than insult and malign the states of people "he" doesn't agree with. Typical