Progressive messaging in media.

Why are the “CHUDS” going to hate her.?

I already said.
Her facial expression is all it'll take.
It's not like CHUDs have had better reasons.

*UA goes to tell me*
Save it.

Her facial expression? Get real.

Says the guy that started a thread about the not-perfectly-white-enough Snow White.
She's off-white, and not alabaster!!

Not surprised that you don’t get why Snow White should be white.

Well, now you and UA have to love new-Supergirl with all your heart, and spleen, and liver.
It's the only way to defeat me.
The power of love will slay my communistic evil.


*Snicker, chortle*

Why should she be white?

There's already been a story told with a white Snow White. It's there any time anyone wants to watch it

What's the harm in having another Snow White movie with an asian or a who gives a fuck what color main character?

Barry White disagrees!

I hope someone does make a Snow White who is super-nonwhite, just like Curly from the Three Stooges doesn't actually have curly hair.

Save this.

Why not tell a NEW story?

Because it's not about entertainment or even making money. It's about pissing people off by vandalizing beloved classics, then calling everyone bigots when their garbage flops. These are bitter, talentless people who can only get attention when they are annoying and alienating consumers.

Nothing is what it is.
Everything's a conspiracy to inconvenience UA.
Because he's that important.

If it's about money, they are doing a POOR job of it.

Nah. It’s about making money. It’s easier to rehash something than it is to create a new tale from whole cloth. Same reason we get reboots of popular TV shows and movies like Star Trek and the like.

Because they are talentless fucking hacks, hired by a DEI checklist.

Yeah that happens too

This is incorrect. The classic is not touched or vandalized. It continues to exist just as it was made

If it flops it flops, who gives a shit. You keep worrying about these inconsequential internet people who say "bigot" when it comes to stupid things like this and it literally affects no one

Yeah, they're the ones coming off as bitter and are the ones annoying and alienating people

Also....

I'm not worried. The market will handle these clowns. But i do reserve the right to point and laugh.

With us or against us!

This:

Is not pointing and laughing, it's getting all butthurt about changing the race of a fictional character

Yes.

Any notion of "this failed because they wanted to stick it to whomever" is secondary.

James Gunn sticks it to CHUDs just by having his job.
They tried to get him fired, and he got to do "The Suicide Squad" and "Guardians 3" and gets to be the Kevin Feige of DC.
Talk about chuddery backfiring.
Talk about actual Twitter ghouls.
Attack him some more, dimwits, you'll make him president.


So yeah, he can make "Superman Legacy" the most down-the-line straightforward superhero movie with zero political content.....but its mere existence pisses on CHUDs.

"CHUDS" didn't try and get rid of Gunn woke Disney did because of something he wrote on Twitter years prior.

Yeah, they did.

And did it fall into their lap through a hole in the clouds from Heaven?
No, CHUDs made hay about it.
Then Bautista exposed the guy who dug up the tweets as a swastika kisser.
Then Disney knew they got played.
Then Gunn got Guardians back, and had double jobs.
And now it's triple.

No, it's definitely me pointing out ridiculously bad writers who take a job they should never have been offered, then proceed to use it to finally "win" the argument with someone who was mean to them as a kid. It's obvious and hilarious.

Say CHUDS again, Mr. Above It All, definitely not impressed with himself.

"Willfully oblivious fascist dupe" is more descriptive, but it's a clunky mouthful.
I mean, I guess I could cut-n-paste it to save time.
But "CHUD" seems to rattle you more for some weird reason.