And Another Private Space Company is Born

Discussion in 'Techforge' started by Tuckerfan, Jun 1, 2017.

  1. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    Crazy billionaire, Paul Allen, re-enters the private space race.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    I would bet this has lots of military applications as well.
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Love Love x 1
  3. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,570
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,703
    Elon Musk's idea is better. Can't land an airplane without a runway. Where's he going to land this plane at the ISS?
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  4. steve2^4

    steve2^4 Aged Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,838
    Location:
    Dead and Loving It
    Ratings:
    +13,927
    Not sure where they're headed.

    SpaceX was going to develop the rocket part that would be carried by this plane. That was shelved in 2012 due to economic reasons.

    Then Orbital Science was going to develop the rocket based on their 20 year old Pegasus XL. This new rocket dubbed Pegasus II was shelved in 2015 due to economic reasons.

    That left only the original Pegasus XL rocket. These guys say they will launch multiples of these per flight. I'm guessing this will wither on the vine due to economic reasons. Orbital Science is quite capable of launching Pegasus XL from their own modified L-1011 aircraft.

    The plane itself is cobbled together from 2 used 747s for engines and flight decks by Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites. Unless Orbital Science vastly increases their business and needs Allen's plane due to volume, think it's likely to fly into history without launching anything. Maybe the Spruce Goose needs a mate.
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2017
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Paladin

    Paladin Overjoyed Man of Liberty

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    50,154
    Location:
    Spacetime
    Ratings:
    +53,511
    [​IMG]
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Sad Sad x 1
  6. steve2^4

    steve2^4 Aged Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,838
    Location:
    Dead and Loving It
    Ratings:
    +13,927
    [​IMG]
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,570
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,703
    Uh, no. I'm not serious. Just pointing out the obvious.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    The plane isn't going to space. It's acting like the first stage of a rocket. The payload it carries will be shot into space, but it isn't going anywhere close to space.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  9. Jenee

    Jenee Driver 8

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2008
    Messages:
    25,570
    Location:
    On the train
    Ratings:
    +19,703
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Will Power

    Will Power If you only knew the irony of my name.

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    6,441
    Location:
    On one of the coasts!
    Ratings:
    +2,333
    I wonder if private & government sponsoring/funding, working together, would make the construction of a permanent Lunar base a reality?

    Stable Moon bases would, should, make things easier regarding space missions.

    We could build a "staircase" to Mars, the Asteroid Belt, & beyond. The "stairs" being the ISS, & perhaps other future space stations, & Lunar bases.
  11. steve2^4

    steve2^4 Aged Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,838
    Location:
    Dead and Loving It
    Ratings:
    +13,927
    It didn't go so well in Space, 1999.
    • Funny Funny x 2
  12. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    No it would not.

    Permanent lunar bases would be a major diversion of effort from other deep space missions and would offer no advantages in refueling, vehicle construction or training.
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
    • Dumb Dumb x 1
  13. steve2^4

    steve2^4 Aged Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,838
    Location:
    Dead and Loving It
    Ratings:
    +13,927
    It has gravity. This could be an advantage in construction. The moon has rich deposits of titanium (10x that of earth deposits) and other metals and gases. source
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  14. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    And is the equipment to mine and process that titanium sitting on the moons surface right now?
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
  15. steve2^4

    steve2^4 Aged Meat

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,838
    Location:
    Dead and Loving It
    Ratings:
    +13,927
    No, nor is it sitting in LEO. At least the moon has the advantage of material in a shallower gravity well. Whether this is advantageous over earth based construction depends on the economics of each. The economics are dependent on engineering. I can imagine the Chinese building factories on the moon before us.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    No. But it is on Earth currently.

    Given that it would have to be lifted out of Earth's gravity well along with the support facilities and workers FIRST! It is very doubtful whether having the ore plentiful on the moon and in a shallower gravity well than Earths would be any significant advantage when those things are factored in.
    • Dumb Dumb x 2
  17. Dinner

    Dinner 2012 & 2014 Master Prognosticator

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2009
    Messages:
    37,536
    Location:
    Land of fruit & nuts.
    Ratings:
    +19,361
    The main competition for SpaceX is the United Launch Alliance. ULA is a bunch of traditional aerospace compa ies using very traditional tech and so their costs are very traditionally high. SpaceX and Allen's company are trying to find ways to bring down costs.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  18. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,137
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,702
    Seems like there is some uncertainty about how this project will continue now that Allen is dead.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  21. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    I can’t find a non-paywalled link, but apparently, someone’s bought the company and plans commercial flights next year.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  22. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • popcorn popcorn x 3
  23. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • Agree Agree x 1
  24. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    More details on the flight this past week.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  25. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    They've flown again.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  26. We Are Borg

    We Are Borg Republican Democrat

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    21,548
    Location:
    Canada
    Ratings:
    +36,512
    This flight system, similar to VirginGalactic's, is inefficient and actually worse for the environment than traditional rocket launches.
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  27. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • Agree Agree x 1
  28. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • Agree Agree x 1
  29. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
  30. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,283
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +155,740
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1