Grover Norquist accidentally provides perfect argument for taxation

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by matthunter, Jun 26, 2017.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Tuttle

    Tuttle Listen kid, we're all in it together.

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2004
    Messages:
    9,017
    Location:
    not NY
    Ratings:
    +4,902
    You gotta be ecky, too much sense to be chup or another of the Brits who post here frequently.

    What an interesting convenience to adoption of multiple layers of regulations and examples of grossly excessive government - existence of sufficient number of agencies amongst which to allocate and shift blame and finger point, leaving most bureaucrats able to survive until the next balls up.
    Tuttle, Jun 27, 2017
    #31
  2. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,609
    Ratings:
    +82,703
    So we're all agreed then.
    Grover Norquist is an awful name, and the dude probably gotten beaten unmercifully in school.
    Diacanu, Jun 27, 2017
    #32
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. T.R

    T.R Don't Care

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,467
    Ratings:
    +9,513
    :lmao:

    Amazing that this has to be spelled out to you but...

    Being against tax increases does not mean that same person is against taxes existing in the first place. It's really not that complicated.

    Geez. :jayzus:
    T.R, Jun 28, 2017
    #33
    • Facepalm Facepalm x 1
Page 2 of 2