If the F-22 is Unnecessary, Why Can't We Export It?

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Chris, Apr 13, 2009.

  1. Elwood

    Elwood I know what I'm about, son.

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    30,008
    Location:
    Unknown, but I know how fast I'm going.
    Ratings:
    +25,065
    After talking to the people that drive them, the F229 engines have already cut the airframe life by nearly 1/3 due to aluminum fatigue associated with the increased thrust.

    We all know that aluminum does not have an infinite fatigue limit and couple that with extremely high thrust, g-loads, friction heating, and rapid air pressure changes and you've got a recipe for rapid aging. Like I said in the other thread, my buddy's plane is older than TKO and it's already on it's second set of wings.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. Muad Dib

    Muad Dib Probably a Dual Deceased Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    53,665
    Ratings:
    +23,779
    The key phrases.

    These aren't Cessnas we're talking about.
  3. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    Curved surfaces are bad for stealth, since at least some of it will bounce back in the direction of the ping.
  4. Captain X

    Captain X Responsible cookie control

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    15,318
    Location:
    The Land of Snow and Cold
    Ratings:
    +9,731
    There'd have to be some modification done to the airframe, so basically it would be designing a new variant. Basically it would be like making a "Super Eagle" the same way the Navy had the "Super Hornet" built. I proposed that myself in another thread and it got pretty negative results, though it would technically be doable, but there would be a development cost associated with it as there's no way to just "plug and play" with a fighter aircraft.

    I can see wanting to drop the F-35, but it's kind of silly not to meet the numbers required to effectively replace the F-15 given that the Air Force effectively killed that aircraft already. Basically the barn door has been fixed after the horses were long gone.
  5. shootER

    shootER Insubordinate...and churlish Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    49,445
    Location:
    The Steam Pipe Trunk Distribution Venue
    Ratings:
    +51,162

    Right.

    I meant it more like extending the life of the F-15s than as a replacement for the Raptor.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Forbin

    Forbin Do you feel fluffy, punk?

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    43,616
    Location:
    All in your head
    Ratings:
    +30,540
    Sure, no problem. Just replace the wings, the engines, the electronics, the tails, and the fuselage, and there you are.
  7. Ash

    Ash how 'bout a kiss?

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    4,748
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +3,656
    The design has been upgraded steadily over 30 years. At some point, you max out. Besides, even if you could do this, why would you? The F-15C production line has been gone since 1985. You're talking about some significant costs to get that up and running again, plus all the redesign and hypothetical upgrades you're thinking about. We've already spent 65 billion on the Raptor and it's being produced NOW. Why shut that down to spend a ton more money on an inferior design? It makes no sense to start over.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Forbin

    Forbin Do you feel fluffy, punk?

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    43,616
    Location:
    All in your head
    Ratings:
    +30,540
    Kinda like going to your Ford dealer and wanting to trade in your '85 Mustang and asking them to build you a brand new '85 Mustang.
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. Dayton Kitchens

    Dayton Kitchens Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    51,920
    Location:
    Norphlet, Arkansas
    Ratings:
    +5,412
    I wonder what the F-14 Tomcat would be like with F229 engines?
  10. Volpone

    Volpone Zombie Hunter

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2004
    Messages:
    43,794
    Location:
    Bigfoot country
    Ratings:
    +16,276
    Well, I dunno 'bout the F-22. But if Gates torpedoes the F-35 program, maybe I can fly one in the Chinese Marine Corps:
  11. Marso

    Marso High speed, low drag.

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    29,417
    Location:
    Idaho
    Ratings:
    +14,151
    Those Chinese definitely paid attention to their Sun Tzu on the matter of spies and spying, didn't they?
  12. Azure

    Azure I could kick your ass

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,008
    Ratings:
    +4,416
    Of course they are going to DENY it.

    Duh.
  13. Captain X

    Captain X Responsible cookie control

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Messages:
    15,318
    Location:
    The Land of Snow and Cold
    Ratings:
    +9,731
    Maybe some /b/tard did it.
  14. Forbin

    Forbin Do you feel fluffy, punk?

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    43,616
    Location:
    All in your head
    Ratings:
    +30,540
    *Forbin decides to do an F-35 model in Flying tigers colors, with Chinese nationalist markings*
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. Captain J

    Captain J 16" Gunner

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    11,019
    Location:
    Taking a dump
    Ratings:
    +5,144
    One wonders how long it will take the Pentagon to learn not to put ANY of these plans and tech on computers with internet access? :bang:
  16. Chris

    Chris Cosmic Horror

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    28,946
    Ratings:
    +4,331
    They don't.

    My guess is that they hacked the contractors.