Oh look what "lawyer" El Chup Left Me........

I come back to wordforge today after work and guess what I see.

82 reps. 41 give or take are negative reps by the so called "lawyer".

I guess he got his wittle feelings hurt.

:repwhine:

ETA- why is that not still a smiley

What? This is an outrage!

Somebody do something!

I think there's only one person with hurt feelings. I could see you getting riled last night, lashing out with the personal and professional attacks because you couldn't bring yourself to say that a severely domesticity abused woman should get a divorce. Once you'd been destroyed in that debate you doubled down on the tedious insulting of my profession and nationality, presumably motivated by the fact that you're jealous that I don't have your dismal career history and obvious incompetence. Now you're doing what you accuse others of - complaining about rep. Hilarious.

Besides, I gave you the neg reps in three threads only. In each of the three threads you were talking utter shite and others were also neg repped the posts I did for that reason. Notice they weren't all "dumb" ratings - you know, the ratings you give out when you don't actually the posts are dumb but are butthurt about losing yet another debate.

Oh, and I also did it because you have admitted many times that neg reps actually bother you. So there was that amusement factor as well. It worked clearly as it triggered you the second you came back to the board.

Love it.

I'm free to complain about 40 some negative reps with no explanation given.

Several of you here bitch and moan when I leave JUST ONE negative rep in a thread.

Hypocrite...…..

I've never complained about rep because I'm not a sensitive little bitch

No explanation? If, for instance, I click the facepalm icon on one if your posts, it's usually because I am in disbelief at the utter nonsense you're talking.

Here's a tip Dayton, if you're such a coward and sensitive snowflake that you can't handle people thinking you're talking shit, don't engage in the debates.

Remember when you laughably accused me of needed to grow a pair last night? Well, I think someone butthurt over a few neg reps is more in need of that than I am.

You keep responding to a call out thread says more about you than it does about me.

Why don't you grow a pair. Or four. A pair and a spare as you seem to routinely lose those you have had.

A call out thread?

This is nothing but a crybaby thread Coach Kitchens. A thread demonstrating how easily you can be trolled.

when someone challenges you to explain your disagreement, it's because you're a moron.

not ironically at all, but when most folks (in tis case, one who you call out directly on the regular) neg you, it's also because you're being a moron.

see... that was nothing but "wah! you identified the flaw in my character that I drew attention to!".

you're almost pavlovian... just need to drool a little less.

This clusterfuck of a thread brings up several pressing issues.

1. Why is @El Chup still here? It’s been several months and @Dinner is still a racist. Shouldn’t Chup have run off to his safe space?
2. If @Dayton3 revecied 82 reps but only 42 were negative who gave him all the positive reps? Was it the “lawyer?” Maybe @NotDayton. Clearly something is afoot.
3. Is @El Chup ’s obsession with @Dayton3 borne not out of political disagreement but instead an underlying sense of jealousy? There are many other conservatives on the board that could debate @El Chup yet he focuses on the one with a severe learning disorder from what is unquestionably the worst state in America. Why? Could it be that @El Chup is simply obsessed with how successful @Dayton3 has been in areas where @El Chup has failed (being a loving husband and father) despite @El Chup coming from an affluent first world cosmopolitan inclusive city while @Dayton3 resides in the least desireable tract of real estate in the northern hemisphere?
4. Perhaps @El Chup is the liberal version of @Dayton3. @Zombie suggested @Dinner but I suspect being Dayton is more than just an antebellum level of institutional racism. I suspect what truly makes @Dayton3 tick, as with @El Chup, is a pathological obsession (compulsive) with their core belief system and an inability to let things go even where a reasonable person would have walked away hours earlier.
5. @Dayton3 claims he went to work today. I doubt it and will continue to doubt it absent proof. That said, if it is true, we can assume Arkansas will remain dead last in education for the foreseeable future if they’re so desperate as to hire mentally challenged armchair generals.

Two in one day. Feels good.

I can't respond to #1, #3, and #4 because I honestly do not know.

#2- There were 82 reps. I was intrigued as such a large number of reps generally only appears when ed629 goes on a neg repping frenzy regarding me. I noted that a great deal of them were from El Chup and I counted 81. Three or four were "funny" and might not be intended as negatives.

Of the other 41 they were an assortment from various posters. Mainly negative. A few positives. Some were quotes and taggings.

#5- Football practice (youth camp) is from 8 AM to 12 noon roughly. Teacher report date is the week after next. I can't even get in to my building this week.

ETA: I love that we both thought of Mel Brooks when we saw this post, just different movies.

And for your student sake hopefully not even then.

Doesn't matter to me. I get paid whether I'm there or not.

This is why people don't take you seriously. You're like an anti-Christian.

This exchange is what Dayton and Chup call "foreplay."

You disagree, @Dayton3? Fine, but it doesn't change anything. You don't seem to care about the least of those who need help, you take advantage of others, you openly speak of violence as a solution against those with whom you disagree, you covet money, you manipulate others to your own ends, and you bear false witness whenever it suits you. If you were an example of Christ, people would run from you, and Christianity, because they wouldn't want to be associated with a person who would be so willing to take from others, and put people in harm's way, for his own benefit.

Maybe for someone who has gone without sex as long as you have...

I agree it's been far too long. I've been traveling for four days, and my lady friends are back in China.

Wouldn't you be against his having sex if he's outside of marriage? Why would you egg someone on like that, hoping they will sin and when they don't, to mock them for it?

I take it you left your cash and credit cards back in China as well...

Lol, I have no idea what you're implying here.

I'm in Vietnam, where fornicating with locals is illegal to boot.

Particularly curious is the implicit boasting from a man who himself says he has little interest in sex and rarely has it.

So not only does he mock you for not having sex outside of wedlock, but he also encourages you with this comment:

To engage in prostitution as a remedy for his mockery. He won't be satisfied until you sin. It's like he wants a millstone around his neck.

Oh, most certainly. Being a braggart is another issue he has. His mouth is like that of a banging cymbal and loud gong.

Man, it had better be a photo of a giant paper bag full of shit, with a little British flag stabbed into the shit.
That'd be fucking hilarious.

*Clicks*

Nope, it's fucking rep whining.
Fuck you, Dayton, you can't do anything right.

Maybe stop saying dumb shit, then.

Liar.