P2P Arms Race? / Campus Copyright Madness

Robotech Master · Jun 8, 2007

A few articles on the current 'war' against file-sharing.

Copyright Silliness on Campus

By Fred von Lohmann
Wednesday, June 6, 2007; A23

What do Columbia, Vanderbilt, Duke, Howard and UCLA have in common? Apparently, leaders in Congress think that they aren't expelling enough students for illegally swapping music and movies.

The House committees responsible for copyright and education wrote a joint letter May 1 scolding the presidents of 19 major American universities, demanding that each school respond to a six-page questionnaire detailing steps it has taken to curtail illegal music and movie file-sharing on campus. One of the questions -- "Does your institution expel violating students?" -- shows just how out-of-control the futile battle against campus downloading has become.

As universities are pressured to punish students and install expensive "filtering" technologies to monitor their computer networks, the entertainment industry has ramped up its student shakedown campaign. The Recording Industry Association of America has targeted more than 1,600 individual students in the past four months, demanding that each pay $3,000 for file-sharing transgressions or face a federal lawsuit. In total, the music and movie industries have brought more than 20,000 federal lawsuits against individual Americans in the past three years.

History is sure to judge harshly everyone responsible for this absurd state of affairs. Our universities have far better things to spend money on than bullying students. Artists deserve to be fairly compensated, but are we really prepared to sue and expel every college student who has made an illegal copy? No one who takes privacy and civil liberties seriously can believe that the installation of surveillance technologies on university computer networks is a sensible solution.

It's not an effective solution, either. Short of appointing a copyright hall monitor for every dorm room, there is no way digital copying will be meaningfully reduced. Technical efforts to block file-sharing will be met with clever countermeasures from sharp computer science majors. Even if students were completely cut off from the Internet, they would continue to copy CDs, swap hard drives and pool their laptops.

Already, a hard drive capable of storing more than 80,000 songs can be had for $100. Blank DVDs, each capable of holding more than a first-generation iPod, now sell for a quarter apiece. Students are going to copy what they want, when they want, from whom they want.

So universities can't stop file-sharing. But they can still help artists get paid for it. How? By putting some cash on the bar.

Universities already pay blanket fees so that student a cappella groups can perform on campus, and they also pay for cable TV subscriptions and site licenses for software. By the same token, they could collect a reasonable amount from their students for "all you can eat" downloading.

The recording industry is already willing to offer unlimited downloads with subscription plans for $10 to $15 per month through services such as Napster and Rhapsody. But these services have been a failure on campuses, for a number of reasons, including these: They don't work with the iPod, they cause downloaded music to "expire" after students leave the school, and they don't include all the music students want.

The only solution is a blanket license that permits students to get unrestricted music and movies from sources of their choosing.

At its heart, this is a fight about money, not about morality. We should have the universities collect the cash, pay it to the entertainment industry and let the students do what they are going to do anyway. In exchange, the entertainment industry should call off the lawyers and lobbyists, leaving our nation's universities to focus on the real challenges facing America's next generation of leaders.

The writer is a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. He represented one of the defendants in MGM v. Grokster, a landmark case concerning peer-to-peer file sharing
Click to expand...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/06/05/AR2007060501761.html

Robotech Master · Jun 8, 2007

Congress, RIAA and Universities prepare for P2P "arms race"
By Ken Fisher | Published: June 07, 2007 - 01:18PM CT

The heated debate over file sharing and the role that American colleges and universities should take in response to it ratcheted up a notch Tuesday as industry players and college and university reps gathered in DC to discuss the problem and potential solutions in a hearing before the House Committee on Science and Technology.

Universities are clear on their position: they do not see themselves as extensions of either the RIAA or the MPAA and are reluctant to get into the game of chasing down students and disciplining them at the behest of such organizations. Congress, however, is making it clear that they expect schools to do something, and the RIAA is waiting in the wings, promising to increase their use of pre-litigation letters.

House Committee members suggested that technological "solutions" should be tested more extensively at schools across the country. Chairman Bart Gordon (D-TN) said that laws will not be enough to curb piracy. "Technology will be the first line of defense," he said. Thus, network monitoring services and traffic shaping tools are being discussed as the solution to this problem, but there are simultaneous warnings that schools could end up spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on technology that will only be circumvented by determined students.

Dr. Charles Wight, associate VP for academic affairs and undergraduate studies at the University of Utah, said that his institution has benefited greatly from technological measures and has seen a 90% reduction in complaints from the RIAA and MPAA. Not only have students backed off file sharing, but he said that the school has saved more than $1.2 million in bandwidth fees and thousands on personnel costs.

The University of Utah uses Audible Magic's CopySense appliance on its campus residence network to thwart the sharing of files recognized by the service. Because that's not a complete solution and can easily be overcome by encryption, the school also monitors the throughput of students' machines and disables their networking capabilities if they exceed 2GB of outgoing traffic in a single day. When this happens, the university contacts the students affected and informs them about what's going on. Students who were engaging in P2P are then asked to sign a letter promising not to do it again, and Wight says there are very few repeat offenders. However, Wight did admit that their system has cut off users who were doing nothing wrong, such as using VoIP.

The entire hearing turned upon the fact that no solution is 100 percent effective and that students can get around "almost any technology solutions to this problem," as Dr. Wight noted. This problem is best addressed by throwing multiple solutions at the problem, including personalized investigation of issues when they arise.

But others warned of a costly "arms race" with students who are technically savvy and already capable of defeating many of the technological solutions on the market. Dr. Greg Jackson, VP and CIO of the University of Chicago, said that his school focuses on educational approaches to curbing piracy, and they have also seen successes that, when described, sound quite similar to that at the University of Utah.

In Jackson's view, technological solutions are not capable of truly dealing with high-traffic networks like those at major universities, because even if they are effective today, students are already finding ways around them, and P2P itself is becoming an increasingly popular approach to networking for things other than illicit file sharing. Jackson questions how something like Audible Magic will continue to work once DRM-free music sales take off, and networks are full of legitimate music files that lack DRM but look "pirated" to commercial systems.

"The only successful, robust way to address problems that involve personal responsibility and behavior is with social rather than technological tools," he said. "If we instead try and restrict behavior technologically... the only result will be an arms race that nobody wins."

The question boils down to money. How much are schools willing to pay to see this problem go away? Educational programs cost money; technological solutions cost even more. In the latter case, there's an emerging sense that making it difficult for Joe User may be worth the money, even if more savvy users can still step around such costly measures. Congress may not wait for such matters to be weighed, however. Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL) said that schools may have to adopt antipiracy technology "whether you like it or not" if the situation does not improve. "The Judiciary Committee is not going to be patient for very long," he warned.

Addendum: For those keeping score, here are some of the failed approaches that have led to the current impasse between schools and the RIAA.

Lawsuits! The original "solution" is still the most common one. It's not enough though, so they've also tried:
Free music! MIT trials LAMP to get students free access to music in a reasonable manner. "Scratch the itch" was the idea. Music industry flips out, says no way. They need money.
Free music (not really)! MIT didn't think about the RIAA's revenue concerns. Now music downloads are tested by forcing students into commercial music subscription services. Some schools are still using this, but by and large it's going nowhere. The lesson? There doesn't seem to be an easy way for the RIAA to monetize their problems.
Propaganda! Scare the bejeebus out of students by telling them that file sharing is a felonious offense. High-profile lawsuits continue, MPAA gets in on the game. This is where we are at now: the threat of legal onslaught.
A new file sharing overlord! New technological approaches to making file sharing difficult or impossible on school-owned networks. Ohio U made the jump, and others are watching. Schools can point to technological solutions and say, "hey, we're paying big bucks for the AntiPirazyZon2000+++, don't come after us!"
Click to expand...

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/pos...d-universities-prepare-for-p2p-arms-race.html

Robotech Master · Jun 8, 2007

Congressman Who Took Money From RIAA/MPAA Says Congress Should Cut Funding To Colleges 12,332 Views
The RIAA's campaign contributions are hard at work this week as members of Congress threaten to cut off federal funding to educational institutions if they don't stop file sharing on their networks.

Rep. Tom Feeney (R-Fla.) who, in the last election cycle, took money from Sony Pictures Entertainment, Time Warner, Universal Music, Viacom, Fox, the RIAA, and The Walt Disney Company, says:

"We're spending a good deal of federal resources in terms of helping universities with their technological improvements, directly and indirectly," Feeney said. "Is it responsible for a Congress that wants to protect intellectual property rights to continue to fund network enhancements for universities if some of those enhancements are indirectly being used in fact to promote intellectual property theft?"

We like Greg Jackson, CIO of the University of Chicago, and Illinois State University dean of libraries Cheryl Elzy's responses:
"So long as the right thing remains more daunting, awkward and unsatisfying than the wrong thing, too many people will do the wrong thing," Jackson said, referring to the digital rights management technology used widely in legally purchased music files....

"If we rely on technology too much, it's going to interfere with legal uses of peer-to-peer technologies," Elzy said. Some of her own library files can be quite large, she added, and "I'd like to not have those blocked."

According to CNet, "Universities receive tens of billions of dollars a year in federal research money, and the Department of Education handed out $82 billion in 2007 in new grants and loans to students." —MEGHANN MARCO
Click to expand...

First of all, Tom Feeney, fuck you. You're in the pocket of all the big record companies so what you have to say on this subject is worthless.

Second, the RIAA strategy is mind boggling. Trying to wring cash out future generations of Americans through lawsuits... that is gonna come back and bite them in the ass.

Especially since youths are the ones you are supposedly targeting with their current line up of 'all star' artists like Brittney Spears and 50 cent. It's not old people who flock to see Akon and Jessica Simpson. It's the kids you are suing and threatening to expel from college.

And the one article made a valid point. You think college kids won't figure out how to get around your copy protection schemes? You are just gonna give them the initiative to get off their lazy, pot smoking asses and start hacking your shit up.

They've handled the whole file sharing thing badly since the very beginning. Apple got wise and is profiting with iTunes. But the record companies themselves know that the music CD market is dying out... and they refuse to change with the times.

JUSTLEE · Jun 8, 2007

If RIAA was smart theyh'd tap into the growing demand of the MP3s instead of their bullshit fighting downloaders, they'd make more money. There is a huge demand for it.

Yet they're fighting the demand and encouraging congress to act on their behalf.

Hmmmm.....

Diacanu · Jun 8, 2007

JUSTLEE said: ↑

If RIAA was smart theyh'd tap into the growing demand of the MP3s instead of their bullshit fighting downloaders, they'd make more money. There is a huge demand for it.

Yet they're fighting the demand and encouraging congress to act on their behalf.

Hmmmm.....
Click to expand...

When a body becomes anti-progress, it ceases to be capitalist, but a fattened royalist fiefdom out to mindlessly suck power at the cost of everything.
Like a cross between Baron Harkonnen, Jabba, and the baby space whale from TNG.

Time for the RIAA to go the way of whalers and buggy whip salesmen.

IMHO.

Log in or Sign up

P2P Arms Race? / Campus Copyright Madness

Robotech Master '

Robotech Master '

Robotech Master '

JUSTLEE The Ancient Starfighter

Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

Log in or Sign up

P2P Arms Race? / Campus Copyright Madness

Robotech Master '

Robotech Master '

Robotech Master '

JUSTLEE The Ancient Starfighter

Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

Useful Searches