In your A Lie A Minute Program, entry #256,488, we give you: A stand-in for Hillary denying that Trump won after Hillary publicly and repeatedly acknowledged his victory.
Tell that to her followers. But get in line: They're not done trashing their own homes yet. You have to admire the pull she's had over others, you being German and all. Sieg heil!
Nope, the silly image in the OP takes its heft from saying "I". If it were to give a voice to a pawn, who argues he shouldn't die because he's never agreed to the rules, the whole thing would fall apart, by which I mean, become much more interesting than the OP wanted it to be.
What silly image? Did someone post another pic of John being anally violated by a pony? Guess I missed it. That's a funny interpretation. I've always viewed the king to be nothing more than a glorified pawn whose continued existence was contingent upon his ability to reflect the will of his lowly brethren. Yes, we get it, you are very smart and sexy and wise and such.
Don't worry. I'm sure the electoral college will come through and hand her the presidency based on what is clearly the true will of the voters. But only if we harass and threaten the electors enough.
I think it's funny (if it's even true) that the left would threaten any electors if they don't vote for Hillary - "for real? Bitch your power is gone. Nobody's afraid of you anymore! You're Denzel at the end of Training Day."
It would take 37 electors to flip in order to change the outcome. Not going to happen. And we should be glad, because that's how civil wars start.
"Fuck it, we think it should be unanimous." That wouldn't go over well, either. Better everyone abides bide the rules.
The current "halfway" measure being proposed is that the electors deny Trump the 270 and then congress will just dump some random moderate Republican on us for president. I don't know why Democrat supporters think this is in anyway realistic.
By all means let's do this. If we want to become the biggest Banana Republic the world has ever seen, that is.
Is there any really solid evidence that Hillary Clinton actually won the popular vote after all possible verifiable votes were counted?
What do you mean? The votes were counted. She got a majority of them. Of course, a properly verified count is something the US is strangely uninterested in, so I suppose you could say that we neither know whether Hillary won the popular vote, nor whether Trump won the votes needed to win the majority of electors.
The fact that you think anybody gives a shit that she won the popular vote is sad. Sadder still is the fact that Hillary (and everyone in politics) knows how US elections work but still thinks grasping at this tiny straw will change the election results.
The last thing I remembered reading a day or two after the election was that there was some question whether she actually conclusively won the popular vote nationwide not.
