Spectre Unmasked: Racist 'Alt-Right' Podcaster Used To Be Local Reporter

@Federal Farmer thinks that ten words are too long to read, guess he's repeating 9th grade again.

Because if we are all honest with ourselves, what we post here and what we actually mean can sometimes be … worded incorrectly. And how many times has a right wing poster mischaracterized what you have posted. Are my posts so vastly different from Mrs.A? Other than she seldom posts about politics, do you wonder what she saw in UA?

10 words? I’d say that’s more of a kindergarten level than 9th grade. Not even kindergarten. Both my boys were reading Dr. Seuss before they were 5 years old.

na... he's consistently punched down as long as he's been here. There's little room for interpretation.

she was a teenage girl, you're a grown woman

He turned her off men.

I think our true selves are accurately portrayed here. We're too keen on not getting in bar fights to say what we really think in person.

If you say so. Just don’t correct the next person who mischaracterizes one of your posts.

I think we were so glad for Mrs. A. that we didn't question it.

What post did I do that to?

If you think UA's online persona is phony, just say it.

I don’t. But I’m beginning to think yours is. You say you’re anti-homophobic, but just said Mrs.A’s sexuality was a choice. You’re homophobic. Fuck you.

Tu quoque (/tjuːˈkwoʊkwi, tuːˈkwoʊkweɪ/; Latin Tū quoque, for "you also"), is an informal fallacy that intends to discredit the opponent's argument by attacking the opponent's own personal behavior and actions as being inconsistent with their argument, therefore hypocrisy.

Some are bisexual. But thank you for correcting me.

So UA is what he seems.

UA is UA. If you wish him to clarify a subject, ask him. I’m just saying that every post on this board is typed with a specific idea and everyone who reads it, reads a slightly different interpretation. It’s just like in real life. Are you suggesting that in all your life, no one has ever asked you to clarify a statement? If you say no, I will call you a liar.

Or on a message board.

The compendium of what someone expresses is more likely to portray what they think than not.

UA treads a narrow path.

Then you’re a fool

I seem to recall she was 16 when they got married, at a time when she couldn't open to the world about being queer and is currently married to a woman, so I'm sure that played a factor.

I’m kinda uncomfortable with the turn this discussion has taken.

There are ways, many ways, many, MANY, MANY ways to get on to UA for being a garbage human being without bringing Jenee or Mrs A and their relationships into it.

You're right. I pulled a dicky trying to be cute. I'm sorry.

There are people here who think they’re smarter than everyone else and think they’re psychologists who has everyone pegged. They don’t care how shitty of a human being they are to prove they’re right. Fortunately for the rest of us, they don’t know nearly as much as think they know about us and in reality, they’re just pieces of shit people who aren’t really that smart.

Why has this thread become about UA anyway? I mean... I was never really fond of his angry stay-the-fuck-out-of-my-way-istay-out-of-yours-too persona, but unless I missed something serious, he's still veeery far from Storm's level of disgusting?

We're easily distracted.

But you know who the real geniuses are?
Anti-SJW media critics on Youtube.

The real question is, why would ANYone be against social justice?

It's the white supremacist "great replacement" theory watered down.
Freedom is pie, and if we give more pie to the minorities, whites have less pie, and eventually white people will have no pie, and we'll starve and die, and the minorities will dispose of our carcasses, and move into our houses.
The only new coat of paint they've added, is "social justice" isn't really social justice, it's this bullshit conspiracy theory.
So are kindness, respect, empathy, or any other human virtue worth a damn.
But conservatism isn't about cruelty and savagery though.
Nope.

Umm... Jenee is the one who brought up both. see post 692 on this page.

actually, I always kind of wondered what you see in him if his postings are a true measure of the man?

.[/quote]

[/quote]
You are just proving you completely missed the point of my post and everything after.

This is my point. You are painting a caricature of things UA and even FF (presumably) have said. T-somegoddammthing said UA’s posts aren’t in the same realm as Spectre. You aren’t “outing” anyone with this nonsense.

You are just proving you completely missed the point of my post and everything after.[/quote]
no... I understood it for the deflection it was meant to be.

frankly the only righties who mischaracterize my words-and often hamfistedly- are Uncle (gawd, the implications there all things considered) and Federal Fuckwit.

Captain X, the quisling, used to, but he's gone now.

no... I understood it for the deflection it was meant to be.

frankly the only righties who mischaracterize my words-and often hamfistedly- are Uncle (gawd, the implications there all things considered) and Federal Fuckwit.

Captain X, the quisling, used to, but he's gone now.[/quote]
I agree. but, that doesn’t change the fact that you completely missed my point and had every intention of doing the same to me.