Still think we shouldn't accept refugees?

http://nypost.com/2011/02/16/cbs-reporters-cairo-nightmare/

Of course we already know how muslims treat women, especially western women. Even the Swedish government says 70% of the rapes in the country are committed by muslims even though muslims only make up 5% if the population.

Yes, I call that being an animal.

Where in those detailed instructions was that part? Oh, that right, your reply has absolutely no relevance at all to my question. Try again.

Arab parasites, eh?

I don't even need to debate you any more. You're doing my job for me.

What do you call a group which just wants to commit mass welfare fraud? They aren't seeking safety as virtually all of them were already safe. The only reason they wanted to go to Germany instead of all the other countries they traveled through was for welfare. They have been quoted over and over again "Germany gives us... free house, free money..."

Hey, Belonis Kamil from Poland, do me a favor.....BUY A VOWEL!

The video only played until Larry David showed up with a megaphone - I'll watch it from anothe computer. Anyway, I just had a thought: didn't the classic movie Scarface start out with disgruntled refugees? Just sayin'

Nice spin. It's almost gturner worthy.

Here's another spin.....

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/03/hungary-train-diverts-refugees-back-to-camp

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...e-camp-Germany-resident-tore-pages-Koran.html

That happened a few weeks ago in Suhl, Germany. An Afghan man who had converted to Christianity was threatened with death by a mob of 14D's "refugees". When police interview to save the man the animals rioted and destroyed their own camp.

If an individual wants to go on a hunger strike that is their right. Destroying it and attacking people who don't want to go on a hunger strike is criminal. But I guess we will have to learn to accept their criminality.

Heaven forbide we should be so racist as to demand they meet our society's norms. That would just be too harsh, I guess.

When you rely on the Daily Fail then you have lost credibility, not that you haven't already done so with your rhetoric over the past few pages.

Why do you lie. The CNN article explicitly says the instructions are to damage or destroy their own boat when the coast guard shows up to prevent t the coast guard from simply towing them back out to sea.

Seriously, read the article before you post such nonsense.

So there wasn't a riot then? You should inform the German government as they say you are wrong and that it did happen.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-33999801

Is the BBC more to your liking? The mob of muslims threatened to kill the Afghan convert to Christianity unless he converted back. His response was to tear out the pages of the cultist's book that they were rubbing his face in, and then the animals tried to kill him. When police stopped them they attacked the police and destroyed much of their own camp.

Just animals being animals.

Ironic statement is ironic.

I don't lie, just forgot that part of the article, because it had nothing to do with my question, (which you neglected to answer, btw), which was:

If the advice tells them to comment criminal or reckless acts, like puncturing and inflatable boat filled with 50 people, then they should be imprisoned for reckless endangerment.

The other point of view is that the main stream media truly isn't covering many of these problems. Compare the BBC coverage of the riot in Suhl to the Telegragh's coverage. Tell me they didn't deliberately leave out key parts in order to be PC.

Today a rainbow appeared at ground zero.


While in Mecca a storm caused a crane to collapse into the grand mosque, killing 87.



*insert quote from the Book of Daniel*

In the pictures there's a discarded sign saying "how to behave" with a red circle showing somebody littering. Oh the horror! Too bad they forgot the red "going crazy with steel rods" circle.

"Reckless," homie.

Seriously, speak American, plz.

I'm trying to wreck less, but it ain't easy.
I have to lock away my crowbar, sledge hammer, and axe, and wear a withdrawal patch.
Even with the patch, when I see a playground, bus stop, or mailbox in pristine condition, I get all jittery, and have to bite my nails.

I don't normally support this argument either but reading several different versions it becomes clear that several large media groups have indeed been leaving out key information. Like the BBC just says the riot started after a man tore part of a Koran. It didn't say it was a muslim convert to Christianity which the muslims were beating and threatening to kill.

How do you explain that massive omission other than trying to be PC?

Germany putting refugees in Buchenwald

They don't mind at all. What could it portend?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34224999

Hungary says starting next week they are going to start arresting illegal aliens who refuse to get registered while several eastern European states are still refusing to take migrants.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/09/12/world/europe/europe-migrant-crisis.html?referrer=

40,000 are expected this weekend which is double last weekend. Word has gone out that the Welfare door is open so there is a made rush to get it while they can.

Considering they are the ones who have caused it all. Remember Bhutto? When asked why she was wearing Hijab, she said, " Saudi Arabia pays them to."

The New York Times on Obama's Syrian Nightmare

Here's a good lecture by Milton Freedman in which he touches on the fact that you can't have free immigration and a welfare state. He compares the beneficial immigration to America of the 1800's to why we can't use such a system today, except as illegal immigration, since illegal immigration to America isn't driven by welfare benefits, it's driven by people making decision to be more productive. If it were legalized then you'd get the immigrants who choose to get on welfare instead of working three jobs. He emphasizes that a generous welfare state and immigration are incompatible. Europe should listen and note.

A very interesting blog post by a Pakistani immigrant to Canada. It starts with:

I’m an immigrant. No, not one of those 2nd generation, born and raised in the West sort of immigrants. I’m the real deal. I was born and raised in a middle-class family in Lahore, Pakistan, to a businessman father and a homemaker mother. After 9/11, my family feared for our safety and future in the country, so we applied for immigration to Canada. I landed in Toronto Pearson International Airport on April 10th, 2005, at the age of 17. And I’m here to tell you, we are not who you are led to believe we are.​

Read the rest.

This was a while back but Kurdi in Switzerland were protesting Turkish policy so a local Turk decided to run them over with his car. So much fun to look forward to with the violent muslims.