Still think we shouldn't accept refugees?

Yes, you can determine genuine apostates if you're willing to be politically incorrect.

http://www.bbc.com/news

The animals are at it again.

Of course NOW France closes its borders. Now when it is too late and they have already let all the Muslim terrorist rats in.

The death count is up to 150.

Deport every mother fucking last one of them.

You realize that these terrorists are the kinds of people that everyone is trying to escape, right?

There are nice safe UN Camps for folks who just want safety. They do not need to be brought into the west to sign up for welfare and commit crime.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...rorist-attack-french-victims-latest-news.html

Reports are saying at least one of the Paris terrorists was a recently admitted "refugee" from Syria. This is what happens when you let animals in.

And the people that are trying to escape are also the people that are trying to escape are trying to escape. Syria fell into a state where everybody started trying to kill each other. The refugees are made up almost entirely of people who found themselves, at some point, on the losing end of the stick, so they fled. The people they fled later found themselves in the same position, and they fled too. So the camps filled up with the people who other people had fled.

But hey, let's throw open the doors to all sides of a genocidal civil war! What could possibly go wrong?

A second terrorist identified as a fake Syrian refugee allowed in during the current invasion.

http://news.yahoo.com/two-men-linked-paris-attacks-registered-migrants-greece-195255102.html

This is what happens when you let animals into civilized places. Will the multiculturalism ever learn?

Yup. I hope that pretty boy Trudeau has serious second thoughts about his stupid campaign promise.

At least he appointed a Sikh as defense minister. They have centuries of experience battling Muslim radicalism.

Okay, that was pretty funny.

Sucks to be you, then.

Yeah I was fine with our immigration policy - I hope Trudeau doesn't mess too much with it.

If you want 15,000 more immigrants, we'd be happy to send you 15,000 Swedish girls from Minnesota and Wisconsin. They already speak the language.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...sist_eu_refugee_plan_after_paris_attacks.html

Poland gets smart and announces not only will they not take any migrants but they are going to deport all of them who are already there. Good for them.

This is all I have to say to that.

http://i.imgur.com/eRnT34K.gifv

The hard reality is their basic needs are met in those camps. The main reason they leave is due to economic reasons. That is just a fact.

Economic migrants have no legal right to be let in. None at all. They are not refugees by the UN definition.

Are they?

http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ons-diabolical-report-jungle-bacteria-hygiene

The Calais camp is not run by the UN and is an informal nest of rats which the French government has allowed to fester. It needs to be cleared immediately and any one who resists or tries to run needs to be put down with extreme force. You cannot allow lawless criminals to break the law with impunity.

Does 14D even understand that Calais is in France? They are illegal alien criminals and they all need to be deported. Every last one. It is a squatter settlement for criminals trying to sneak onto the UK and make money by robbing lorries and robbing local French people.

Refugee camps are supposed to be temporary.

Right, and they can go back home when the war is over but until then they have been given a nice safe place where their basic needs are met. They have no right to enter the west. Not any legal basis in any event.

It is bleeding hearts willing to give away other people's money and invite a collection of terrorists, criminals, and welfare fraudsters who have let the parasites in. This mistake needs to be fixed and Poland has the right of it.

Martin O'Malley is saying we should take in 65,000 Syrian refugees.

Hillary says we should take 65,000 Syrian refugees, but using a good screening and vetting process.

They had a GAO report out recently that every single one of the Syrian "refugees" let in costs $65,000 just in the first five years because they are unskilled and have sky high rates of welfare usage.

http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/11/taxpayer-bill-to-resettle-35000-mideast-refugees-2-3-billion/

That counts only the federal costs and not state and local costs.

World Nut Daily? Really? That's your source?

You wouldn't accept a WND link for anything other than anti-refugee hysteria.

Ok, refer to the linked GAO report then.

It's also impossible to vet them as Hillary wants. The commander of the Syrian forces we spent $500 million to train turned his weapons over to ISIS and laughed at the stupid Americans. If the CIA and Pentagon, given hundreds of millions of dollars, couldn't manage to figure out that the very forces they were training with weapons were actually jihadists, then the even more inept branches of the US government, such as the State Department, don't have a prayer of doing it.

Those forces surrendered mainly because we wouldn't support them. Congress only allowed 15 bullets a month per man and no pay.

We have a rep button for that, but this gif is good, too!

They didn't surrender, they swapped sides as soon as they crossed the border, giving ISIS a whole lot of sweet US hardware.

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/pa...ks-frances-jews-question-their-future-n284466

Europe's Jews leaving at record rates due to endless attacks by subhuman muslim savages. Political leaders need to be charged with cultural genocide for their complicity in this crime.