http://www.businessweek.com/bschool...3_153722.htm?chan=rss_topEmailedStories_ssi_5 Based on comments to the article (viewable at the link above), it appears that the site in question never actually claimed to offer access to live questions, but rather questions prepared by the site's tutors. Clearly ScoreTop is in the the wrong for publishing live test questions, but how were these students to know that the site was using stolen materials? Must one assume that all unofficial study guides are considered cheating then?
They can anylize documents these days with computers. Kinda like there is a site teachers and proffessors can go to and check papers in a database for plagerizm.
Good. People that lie and cheat and then turn out to be idiots ruin the reputation of those of us that do it the hard way and can pull our weight. I hope they nail everyone who's used the site to cheat and those people wind up having to be janitors in porno theaters.
So using an unofficial study guide is cheating? How were these people to know that the site was using "live" questions? From a comment posted to the article:
Baba - I can pretty much assume nobody will ever accuse you of plagiarism buy putting an example of your writing into a computer. All the computers in the world couldn't crack that code. You could make the Navajo "Wind Talkers" eat a grenade in frustration.