Terraforming Mars Not as Easy as Once Thought

Discussion in 'Techforge' started by Tuckerfan, Aug 3, 2018.

  1. Ebeneezer Goode

    Ebeneezer Goode Gobshite

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    19,127
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Ratings:
    +8,259
    You mean like a giant ball of fusing gases emitting a few hundred yottawatts of power? Something like that?

    No idea where we'd find one of those just floating about.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,155
    Likes Received:
    23,224
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Level Designer - I make video games
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,782
    Yeah, that's exactly the point. Even if you had a rigid sphere with a diameter equivalent to Earths orbit then you would need artificial gravity on the surface to stop a resident from floating away the first time they took a single step, unless the sphere itself has many times more mass than our sun.

    The gravitational pull of the Sun on the Earth is a mighty 0.00588 ms^2.

    edit: My calculations might be off here, but I estimate that if you built a hollow sphere of cast iron with the mass of the sun and a size equivalent to Earths orbit it would have a shell around a kilometre thick.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2018
  3. Ebeneezer Goode

    Ebeneezer Goode Gobshite

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    19,127
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Ratings:
    +8,259
    But if the mass of the rigid sphere equals that of the Earth, it's gravitational field on the outer surface would be equal to Earth's would it not? The gravitational field of a shell is the same as the equivalent point mass.

    It's been a looong time since I sat in a physics class, but didn't Newton's shell theorem prove that?
     
  4. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,155
    Likes Received:
    23,224
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Occupation:
    Level Designer - I make video games
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,782
    It sure is, but if this is a Dyson Sphere then it's gonna be a lot bigger than the Earth. While it's overall gravitational footprint is large, the force on its surface would be equivalent to if you were 149.6 million km away from the Earth.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Ebeneezer Goode

    Ebeneezer Goode Gobshite

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    19,127
    Likes Received:
    6,664
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    Ratings:
    +8,259
    :doh: yup the radius!

    You'd need a lot more mass! Which comes with its own downsides.

    Hold on the white dwarf mining, it's neutron stars we need to mine! :D
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Lanzman

    Lanzman Vast, Cool and Unsympathetic Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    35,189
    Likes Received:
    28,714
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Web Designer/Graphic Artist
    Location:
    Someplace high and cold
    Ratings:
    +36,701
    I want to say - and could be wrong - that if you want to build a megastructure like this, a ringworld is a better choice than a Dyson sphere. Less material, for one thing. You can build multiple ones around a star so that they can have different angles to the plane of the ecliptic. The gravity thing is still an issue but if you get your sums right, you may be able to spin the ring fast enough for centrifugal gravity. Maybe.
     
  7. Tuckerfan

    Tuckerfan BMF

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    77,702
    Likes Received:
    50,061
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Stopping The Man!
    Location:
    Can't tell you, 'cause I'm undercover!
    Ratings:
    +156,684
    Nope. A ringworld is unstable.
     
  8. ed629

    ed629 Morally Inept Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2004
    Messages:
    14,760
    Likes Received:
    10,037
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +17,872
    Yup... but if you built a Dyson Sphere around a star where the gravitational pull was 9.8m/s then you'd have earth gravity on the surface of it.
     
    • popcorn popcorn x 1
  9. Zombie

    Zombie dead and loving it

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    45,044
    Likes Received:
    26,392
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +33,117
    Why not live on the inside?

    A Dyson Sphere would be so massive, that if you could build it than you could certainly engineer sun blockers that would orbit around the sun and create night on the surface of the sphere.

    Edit: Also I think if you've got the ability to actually build a solid sphere around a star you probably have control of gravity because you're going to need that to make the sphere stable around the star. So the gravity on the inside of the sphere will be provided by you using the sun's energy to power the system.
     
  10. Zombie

    Zombie dead and loving it

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    45,044
    Likes Received:
    26,392
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +33,117
    Here's some good videos on building huge things like Ringworlds and Dysons.









     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Zombie

    Zombie dead and loving it

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    45,044
    Likes Received:
    26,392
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +33,117