Do you really think that's supposed to convince anyone? The man is so far up Trump's ass he can see his uvula. Even Trey "BUT BENGHAZI" Gowdy doesn't take him seriously and constantly contradicts him.
Link better than Hannity? You seem to live in some sort of fantasyland disconnected from reality. How's the weather there? But by all means, tell me what your sources are for any of your fairy tales. If there are any, which at this point, given your record so far, I'm seriously inclined to doubt. There's 0 evidence either Clinton knew about Uranium One's sale and in either case neither Clinton had power to stop the sale - only Obama did. Got any info to the contrary? Put up or shut up. Also that's Tony Podesta, not John Podesta, who was a major victim of the Russian hacking. If there was collusion on Hillary's part, then she's thoroughly irrational. Who the hell would collude with someone so obviously trying to hurt her campaign? How could it be collusion? And yes I've got the luxury of caring less: she lost. I care a great deal more about a treasonous president than a failed candidate. I didn't. And you're projecting. You're starting to lose it. There's not a person here who's lost anything, and no one here who's committed any crimes related to Russia, though I'm starting to wonder about you; don't think I didn't notice the switcheroo of scare quotes around 'meddling' (indicating you don't think Russia meddled) to 'collusion' and pretending you didn't put them around 'meddling' the first time.
He strikes me as someone who has spent far too long hanging out in the brietbart comments sections and binge watching Infowars.
think I'm gonna have to add him to the list. There's only so much eye-bleeding stupidity (or poorly executed trolling?) one can deal with in life.