Trek XI Enterprise concept.

Discussion in 'Media Central' started by Diacanu, Apr 1, 2007.

  1. The Original Faceman

    The Original Faceman Lasagna Artist

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    40,856
    Ratings:
    +28,818
    If we wanted practical, Cass, we'd just build Borg cubes. Oooh....sleek!
  2. Fisherman's Worf

    Fisherman's Worf I am the Seaman, I am the Walrus, Qu-Qu-Qapla'!

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    30,592
    Ratings:
    +43,004
    I'd argue that :tos: is the icon for the entire franchise, not the Enterprise. There have been like 10 (8 of them with the name Enterprise) different main ships used in each series or movie, while :tos: has been pretty much constant, only in slightly varying forms.

    And I agree with Cass that the original Enterprise just doesn't look that good or practical. It seriously looks like it could fall apart at any second, if it weren't for the duck tape that Scotty used in just the right places.
  3. The Original Faceman

    The Original Faceman Lasagna Artist

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    40,856
    Ratings:
    +28,818
    I'm only counting 7 Enterprises (ENT, 1701, A, B, C, D, E)

    Plus VOY and Defiant is 9 ships.
  4. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,592
    Ratings:
    +82,682
    Hmm, well, I guess one could count the nuclear aircraft carrier from TVH, and the Ent-J from that one episode of ENT.
  5. Fisherman's Worf

    Fisherman's Worf I am the Seaman, I am the Walrus, Qu-Qu-Qapla'!

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    30,592
    Ratings:
    +43,004
    Well, I count the TOS Enterprise and the movie refit Enterprise as separate ships (even if they weren't), because the refit looks a lot better.
  6. The Original Faceman

    The Original Faceman Lasagna Artist

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    40,856
    Ratings:
    +28,818
    but movie ENT 1701 and 1701 A are the same too...
  7. Fisherman's Worf

    Fisherman's Worf I am the Seaman, I am the Walrus, Qu-Qu-Qapla'!

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    30,592
    Ratings:
    +43,004
    I thought the 1701 refit was destroyed. Kind of the whole point of having the 1701-A, and I think it looked slightly different than the refit.
  8. The Original Faceman

    The Original Faceman Lasagna Artist

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    40,856
    Ratings:
    +28,818
    I thought they looked 100% the same but for the "A"
  9. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,592
    Ratings:
    +82,682
    The sets were different, but the model was the same.
  10. The Saint

    The Saint Sentinel Angel

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,065
    Location:
    Bat country. (Can't stop here.)
    Ratings:
    +145
    According to something I read somewhere (some tech manual or another back when I was a wee lad) about 70% of the TOS 1701's structure was completely replaced during the refit to the TMP 1701, it almost technically is an entirely new ship.
  11. Sherlock Holmes

    Sherlock Holmes Resurrected

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    16,396
    Location:
    221b Baker Street
    Ratings:
    +978
    Not really... there were alot of diferences...



    THe enterprise in TOS was a Constitution (or Starship depending on source) class ship...

    The refit in TMP was it's own class, Enterprise Class....

    The A from IV - VI was a Constitution II class ship.


    THe diffrences between the Enterprise class and Connie II class is mostly internal.
  12. Talkahuano

    Talkahuano Second Flame Lieutenant

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2006
    Messages:
    12,995
    Location:
    Ul'dah
    Ratings:
    +8,533
    I'm glad it's a prank.

    I'm not too keen on the idea of this movie. A design like that being the real thing would make me :vomit:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. gul

    gul Revolting Beer Drinker Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    52,375
    Location:
    Boston
    Ratings:
    +42,367
    Hmm, I liked it. But then I always liked the "Akiraprise," too. If they went with a ship like this, I imagine the meltdown over at TrekBBS would be quite amusing.
  14. Order2Chaos

    Order2Chaos Ultimate... Immortal Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    25,217
    Location:
    here there be dragons
    Ratings:
    +21,464
    Had that been "Enterprise Under Construction" art, it would have been pretty cool, except for the pylons being too wide. And then at the end of the movie we get the TOS Enterprise. And the antennae aren't just there during "The Cage", they're also visible in other episodes... I'm sure I saw them in "Mirror, Mirror", for example.
  15. Sean the Puritan

    Sean the Puritan Endut! Hoch Hech!

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    25,788
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +15,703
    True enough. Very well accepted.

    There is vague evidence to support this, but the issue is not canonically decided and there is great room for debate. Personally, I agree with you.

    What is your evidence for this? I have never heard this before. In fact, if I remember correctly it was the REFIT Enterprise (not the A) that was identified as a "Constitution II Class" by the Klingons in STIII:TSFS. Personally I think that NCC-1701-A is the same class of ship as the refit NCC-1701.
  16. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,592
    Ratings:
    +82,682
    Scotty looked at blueprints in STVI that nailed it home in canon as constitution refit.
  17. gul

    gul Revolting Beer Drinker Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2004
    Messages:
    52,375
    Location:
    Boston
    Ratings:
    +42,367
    And my wife thinks I'm a nerd. Good grief!
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. The Saint

    The Saint Sentinel Angel

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,065
    Location:
    Bat country. (Can't stop here.)
    Ratings:
    +145
    Love of beer cancels out nerdhood.
  19. BearTM

    BearTM Bustin' a move! Deceased Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    27,833
    Ratings:
    +5,276
    The difference between the NCC-1701 Refit and the NCC-1701-A are primarily internal. The internal arrangement of the secondary hull, for example, is entirely different, as is seen in the radically different hangar and cargo bays.
  20. Sherlock Holmes

    Sherlock Holmes Resurrected

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    16,396
    Location:
    221b Baker Street
    Ratings:
    +978
    Well, going by strictly TMP, TWOK, and TSFS, the classes are clearly defined on screen with display and signage...

    The FJ plans were shown on screen for The saladin, Potomley, Federation, and constitution classes. Nailing down those names/classes...

    Signage refering to the Refit E as Enterprise were seen in TWOK and on TMP Production art...


    No, the klingons refered to the refit as a "federation battlecruiser"...

    Scottys place mat schematics in TUC identify the ship as a constitution class... The II designation after the class name diferentated between TOS/FJ Connies from the new Refit. Such a designation wouldn't be nessary once all TOS/FJ type connies were decommissioned/scraped... Which we can assume had happened by the time of TUC.

    Internal differences were structural, with the Connie II haveing a diferent internal frame work with increased supports which reduced the saucer's internal usuable space (this is seen in the smaller officer quarters and in the enlisted bunk rooms). Also different was the Warp Drive engine, and the turboshaft system (the later can be seen in the bridge turbo alcoves and in the turbo shaft in the center of the shuttlebay fore wall)
  21. Sean the Puritan

    Sean the Puritan Endut! Hoch Hech!

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    25,788
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +15,703
    No, they aren't "clearly" defined. They are vaguely defined. That's we are able to have grounds for an argument over it. Clearly defined things don't tend to have a lot of room for argument.

    When? I don't remember those.

    Are you talking about the Mark IV Simulator - Enterprise Class? If so, that possibly means that the simulator is a simulation of the bridge on an Enterprise Class ship. It could ALSO mean (since the Enterprise was now a training ship) that it is the Mark IV Simulator reserved for the use of the class of students assigned to USS Enterprise.

    ... which is non-canonical!


    My bad... it was in the TSFS novelization and (maybe) comic adaptation.

    That's all the canonical on-screen info we need.

    Which is totally unsupported by anything onscreen and is strictly conjecture, and therefore, non-canonical.
  22. Sherlock Holmes

    Sherlock Holmes Resurrected

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    16,396
    Location:
    221b Baker Street
    Ratings:
    +978
    http://www.trekplace.com/article09.html

    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/sftm.htm







    http://www.trekplace.com/article02.html




    Some other related topic articals...

    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/constitution-refit.htm

    http://www.trekplace.com/article06.html
  23. Starchaser

    Starchaser Fallen Angel

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,971
    Location:
    Hiding from aliens
    Ratings:
    +3,261
    Looks like something out of an anime cartoon.
  24. Sean the Puritan

    Sean the Puritan Endut! Hoch Hech!

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    25,788
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Ratings:
    +15,703
    No, Ted. Barely recognizable bridge displays that can only be deciphered by electronically enhancing DVD footage are NOT canonical.

    Shame on you!
  25. Kyle

    Kyle You will regret this!

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    9,150
    Location:
    California?!?!
    Ratings:
    +2,814
    If I recall correctly, this is Shane Johnson bullshit and not to be listened to.
  26. Diacanu

    Diacanu Comicmike. Writer

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    101,592
    Ratings:
    +82,682
    Ayup.
  27. shootER

    shootER Insubordinate...and churlish Administrator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    49,447
    Location:
    The Steam Pipe Trunk Distribution Venue
    Ratings:
    +51,173

    IIRC (and it's been a while since I've read them), it's from Jackill's Ships of the Star Fleet. The first one, not the recent "update". :garamet:*










    *While the update is "okay", there are some really wonky "facts" in there like shuttle complements and photon torpedo basic loads that just don't seem plausible (or possible, in the case of the shuttles). Plus, with the copy I got for Christmas, the freakin' ink smudges! :mad:
    • Agree Agree x 1
  28. The Saint

    The Saint Sentinel Angel

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    5,065
    Location:
    Bat country. (Can't stop here.)
    Ratings:
    +145
    *watches ted, watches chaos descending* :calli:

    NERDFIGHT! NERDFIIIIIIIIGHT!!!

    :lol:
    • Agree Agree x 3
  29. Marso

    Marso High speed, low drag.

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Messages:
    29,417
    Location:
    Idaho
    Ratings:
    +14,151
    FASA's RPG had tagged the refit 1701 as the 'Enterprise' Class as well.
  30. Bailey

    Bailey It's always Christmas Eve Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    27,155
    Location:
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Ratings:
    +39,781
    This is a silly argument, but what happens if the shot becomes available in hd quality at some point?