...into your countries and setting them up with government aid may not have been as brilliant an idea as it sounds. Remember when you guys laughed at Dinner for saying this? It was almost as funny as the time he said Trump was going to beat Hillary Clinton, wasn't it?
"Daesh might try to counterattack countries that are currently attacking it" isn't exactly a shocking revelation. And refugees have nothing to do with it. Weren't most of the Paris attackers low-level gangsters born in Europe?
To pretend that this impossible for ISIS agents to pose as refugees is extremely ignorant. But otherwise I agree.
I didn't claim it was impossible. I do, however, claim it's an improbable and needlessly complicated tactic, were they to try.
Nothing is impossible, but @14thDoctor correctly pointed out that the OP's story had nothing to do with that.
Um, what? It has everything to do with that. The two primary methods for ISIS recruitment based attacks are domestic radicalisation and cross border infiltration via immigration, with both sources drawing from people based in IS territory. I'm scratching my head as to why you're denying that the likely increase in attacks may come from such sources. The irony of all this is the increase in attack prediction comes from the notion that IS will act out of desperation as their control becomes weak. That's a good thing, no?
Dear god, you arw terminally stupid. You have a million fraudstwrs a year pouring across borders without an ID check ever until they get to the welfare office. They can and do send anypne they want, you retard.
