UK Supreme Court: We can say whatever we want because no one will know

Discussion in 'The Red Room' started by Ancalagon, Feb 17, 2024.

  1. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,539
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,073
    • Funny Funny x 2
  2. Ancalagon

    Ancalagon Scalawag Administrator Formerly Important

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    51,539
    Location:
    Downtown
    Ratings:
    +58,073
    Looking it up De Keyser is basically just the 5th Amendment but a hundred and fifty years later.

    Congrats UK, the government can’t take your stuff without paying for it. :techman:

    Attorney-General v De Keyser's Royal Hotel Limited is a leading case in UK constitutional lawdecided by the House of Lords in 1920 which exhaustively considered the principles on which the courts decide whether statute has fettered prerogative power.[1] It decided that the royal prerogative does not entitle the Crown to take possession of a subject's land or buildings for administrative purposes connected with the defence of the realm without paying compensation. It is the authority for the statement that the royal prerogative is placed in abeyance (is not used) when statute law can provide a legal basis for an action.[2]


    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney-General_v_De_Keyser's_Royal_Hotel_Ltd
  3. Order2Chaos

    Order2Chaos Ultimate... Immortal Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    25,201
    Location:
    here there be dragons
    Ratings:
    +21,426
    I think it’s pronounced “De Keyser” :async: