Lacking teh Baba as an option, I selected sharia, because it is more brutally totalitarian than I would expect from trumpism. that said, I can definitely see the point that Packard and quest are arguing. Sharia is highly regimented, strongly articulated, and thoroughly rests on a systemic logic (the conclusions of which I find intolerable). Trumpism is based more on manipulation of passion to achieve unspecified goals. NAZIs seem in many ways to have fit that description better than Sharia would fit. Neither is perfect match, though, so whoever said above that it was a comparison of three disimilar things probably has it right.
There actually are countries which have parallel legal systems of sharia law and common/civil law, with sharia law only being imposed on its Muslim citizens.
In fact, sharia demands that. You're breaking sharia if you're applying it indiscriminately to Muslims and non-Muslims.
I see Ramen is disappointed that some actual adult discourse happened in his thread, and has returned to post some memes in an attempt to drag it down to an IQ level he can cope with.