Will the new Terminator movie ruin the TV show? MAJOR SPOILERS!

Discussion in 'Media Central' started by Parallaxis, Sep 9, 2008.

  1. Parallaxis

    Parallaxis Reformed Troll - Mostly

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,721
    Ratings:
    +908
    Message in second post. Just in case the spoiler tag craps out on the mouse hover.
  2. Parallaxis

    Parallaxis Reformed Troll - Mostly

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,721
    Ratings:
    +908
    So what the hell? In John Conner dies at the end of the new movie and doesn't lead humanity to freedom why should we give a shit about John on the tv show ?
  3. RickDeckard

    RickDeckard Socialist

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    37,820
    Location:
    Ireland
    Ratings:
    +32,368
    Where did you get that info from?

    The continuity of the Terminaotr series is so jumbled at this point that I'm past caring though.
  4. Parallaxis

    Parallaxis Reformed Troll - Mostly

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,721
    Ratings:
    +908
    ^
    I actually thought the tv series did a good job of taking into account all 3 movies.

    But now, who cares? The fact that John is really a nobody kind of just kills the whole thing for me.
  5. The Original Faceman

    The Original Faceman Lasagna Artist

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    40,849
    Ratings:
    +28,810
    Well the TV series states that the terminator killed John Connor in the future, right?

    But I thought the point of this movie was a new trilogy so John Connor will be in all 3??
  6. bryce

    bryce Optimism - It's Back!

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    Messages:
    7,519
    Location:
    Space, The Final Frontier
    Ratings:
    +3,129
    I've always believed that the 3rd movie (while referenced in the series, with Sarah's dying of cancer) and the series take place in different timelines.

    One where the Rivernator took them 10 years (or so) into the "future", and one where she never came and they stayed behind.

    Hell, time travel is involved...all the movies and the series may be in alternate timelines.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Robotech Master

    Robotech Master '

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    9,995
    Ratings:
    +3,939
    If Ahnuld and Linda Hamilton aren't involved, then its not Terminator.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Uncle Albert

    Uncle Albert Part beard. Part machine.

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2004
    Messages:
    60,762
    Location:
    'twixt my nethers
    Ratings:
    +27,683
    Continuity is a very flexible concept in the Terminator universe. You're missing the point if you fixate on that rather than enjoying it for what it is.
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Parallaxis

    Parallaxis Reformed Troll - Mostly

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,721
    Ratings:
    +908
    Yes, but the central point remains the same - John Connor is the future of humanity. I mean really - what's the fucking point if John Connor never did anything ? Why should I care about TV show John Connor if he's a nobody who dies a meaningless death at the start of the war ? Kind of makes all his struggles seem pointless ?
  10. RickDeckard

    RickDeckard Socialist

    Joined:
    May 28, 2004
    Messages:
    37,820
    Location:
    Ireland
    Ratings:
    +32,368
    When was it ever indicated that any of the productions took place in an alternate timeline from any of the others?
  11. Parallaxis

    Parallaxis Reformed Troll - Mostly

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    3,721
    Ratings:
    +908
    ^
    That was my take as well.

    There is one timeline being altered, not different timelines diverging. A geeky, but plot important fact I think.